Thursday, September 29, 2016

ISLAM ALWAYS ATTACKS FIRST!

From here (I tried to post this in response to an article at Gatestone, but doubt they'll approve it)!

 [Onfray is represented as accusing the West as having "attacked first". I take umbrage from that false accusation but fell short of representing the whole truth which, as Dajjal asserts, is that Islam vs The World is the first world war begun in 624 and waged with short interruptions ever since.]

"Perhaps these craven and morally inverted libTurds [AssWholes] have forgotten that islam openly declares its holy right and duty to its "god" to always attack first[1].

Allah deliberately created us as infidels for the muslims to attack, to prove them selves to him. That's their narrative, and they won't be soon changing their tune.

These intellectual midgets conveniently forget that all those Middle Eastern "muslim countries" which they mistakenly presume were always theirs, were ALL previously Greek, Christian countries, before they were violently invaded, genocided, raped and conquered by the muslim Arabs! (Hint: Arabs are ONLY from the country called "Arabia")! You know, countries like: Egypt, Syria, Libya, Tunisia, Morocco, Iraq, a large part of Greece itself (the parts formerly known as Thrace, Tarsus, and Anatolia, but now called "Turkey") and India (now known as "Bangladesh" and "Pakistan")!

So, NO; We didn't start it by attacking them first. Before Muhammad, (and, come to think of it, ever since, too) nobody had ever bothered to invade Arabia - a lifeless land of volcanoes and deserts - not even Alexander the Great! So islam wasn't formed to "defend muslims" (which also never existed before Muhammad)!

Read the Qur'an, ahadith and sirat - there is nothing defensive about islam:

The Qur’an clearly and very specifically tells muslims the Bible is wrong and also that all Christians and Jews are infidel criminals who worship a false god, and who must therefore be extorted, enslaved, and murdered for their “crime” of not being muslims:

Sura (Chapter) 47:1-4 of the Qur'an:

1: non-muslims are bad, (allegedly because they insult allah by dividing his nature*);
2: muslims are good, (allegedly because to them allah is the cause of everything*);
3: Allah made them both like that;
4: So muslims should chop off the non-muslims' heads.
("Allah could have done it himself, but he wants you muslims to do it for him").
...

It's all right there, in context: islamic violence is entirely general doctrine-driven, and not at all specific grievance-driven. 

(And chapter 47 isn't by any stretch even remotely the worst, most violent chapter; that honor goes to either chapter 8 or 9).

So don't go looking for what actions of yours may have offended or provoked them; they have been taught from birth that your existence alone offends their god, and so should offend them. [http://islamexposed.blogspot.com/2016/03/al-wala-wal-bara-fountainhead-of.html]

Muslims have been officially taught to believe that they are the “best of people” (Qur’an 3:110 [Sahih Bukhari 6.60.80]) and that unbelievers are the “most vile of created beings” (Qur’an 98:6).

-------
*[Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority: their abode will be the Fire: And evil is the home of the wrong-doers! (3:151)].

...

So, if and when you consider islam to be a religion, you must agree with it’s main tenet: that God is a violent murderer who wants his muslim tribe to violently conquer the world by extorting, enslaving, and murdering all the non-muslim humans, right?

At WORST, all REAL religions only say:

"Obey our silly rules, or GOD (/'the gods') will get you!"

...but ONLY islam says:

"Obey our silly rules, or WE will get you ('for god')!"

A forced 'Faith!' ISN'T a "Faith!" at all - it's only extortion, and extortion is always a CRIME.

Bottom line: Muslims must be told straight out, unequivocally: "If you decide to believe in "allah," you have declared yourself a criminal, and so must be arrested, indicted, tried and convicted. Your confession of "faith" in your crime-god will help us to do so."

=======

Further, here are some more teachings from the Koran, “valid from eternity to eternity”:

2:191 Slay the unbelievers wherever you come upon them.
9:5 Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them. 
2:98 Allah is the enemy of the unbelievers.
30:45 Allah does not love the unbelievers.
3:28 Muslims must not take the infidels as friends.
3:85 If anyone desires a religion other than Islam (submission to Allah) it will never be accepted.
8:12 Cast terror into the hearts of the infidels. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.
8:60 And prepare against them whatever you are able of power and of steeds of war by which you may terrify the enemy of Allah and your enemy.
4:89 Anyone trying to leave islam must be murdered for it.

Got that yet? “Kill them wherever you find them!” is from (2:191, 4:89, AND 9:5).

There really is not any room for doubt. Islam is a MURDER-gang / extortion racket posing as religion."
Muslims & Dhimmis assert falsely that Jihad is exclusively defensive; that Muslims only fight to defend themselves. They malignantly cite 5.32, kaiffed from the Sanhedrin, to 'prove' that Islam does not attack innocent people, concealing with kitman, their conceit that only Muslims are innocent. They do not cite5.33, which prescribes hudd for "waging war against Allah and his Messenger", which is not defined in the Qur'an. Ibn Kathir defined it in his tafsir"`Wage war' mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. ..." [Emphasis added.] They can decapitate you for not believing in Allah. See also the two pdf files embedded at the top of this blog for more detail from Shari'ah. 

    There is no mention of defensive Jihad in the main Jihad imperatives: 8.399.29 & 9.123. Defensive/retaliatory Jihad is mentioned in 22.39 & 2.191 but the reference to those who fight you" in2.190 means those who reject and resist Islam, not "those who attack you" . Refer to Sahih Muslim 19.4294.

Here is the relevant Islamic law from "The Reliance Of The Traveller", echoed in Hedaya, Volume 2, page 143 and Risala Chapter 30.2(b).  Muslims must invite their victims to Islam before attacking!  If you need more proof that Jihad is offensive, refer to "The Book Of Jihad", page 18.
O9.8: The Objectives of Jihad
The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N:provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

DEBATE ONE: Kermit Looked Green

DEBATE #1:

It was underwhelming, to say the least.

KERMIT (OR "PEPE" TRUMP, IF YOU PREFER) LOOKED KINDA ... GREEN.



Green to political debate. Well, hey, he's green to politics in general. Being a Dem all his life so far doesn't seem to have prepared him (or maybe it prepared him all too well) to face them down, he seems to have forgotten that they're only "all about emotion" (i.e: a "clash of personalities") because they're trying to distract us and cover up for their crimes! He's not a Conservative, so he doesn't know what it is he's facing. He isn't able to face the truth about them, much less face them down for us!

OK, HERE'S MY FREE ADVICE (since I'm the Smartest 'human' in the World) TO TRUMP:

DONALD! LISTEN TO WHAT YOUR OPPONENT IS SAYING! LISTEN TO THE IMPLICATIONS SHE'S NOT SAYING! HERE'S HOW IT WENT, AND - IF YOU DON'T SMARTEN UP ASAP, HOW IT'S ALWAYS GOING TO GO!

We, your loyal constituents, don't want to see the same-old binary political Muppet Show reruns!



OK, so, I just reviewed a lot of Google images of her: that definitely wasn't Hillary on TV tonight!

There is NO WAY that amount of bloating and wrinkles and overall facial sag could be ironed out that quickly at all! And the teeth were different, and so was the nose! I saw her nostrils in every shot, yet look at the internet archives: the real Hillary's nose is older and so, longer and saggier.

And that body-double we all saw couldn't quite mimic Hitlery's patented psychotic hysteria, either!

Well, whoever she was, she implied "to stop Russian cyber-hackers, we must control all Internet companies!" SCARY.

How did Donald miss that one?!

Ditto for the economy: he said "lower taxes!" so she said "government must 'invest' more!" (i.e: tax some to give to others)! Again: He missed it!

She says: "Intelligence surge!" needed to fight ISIS (i.e: give the NSA a larger payroll budget to hire more spies to spy on Americans)!

As opposed to a simple solution: "Ban all muslims as they are all members of a crime-gang!"

And he missed it AGAIN!

Hillary: "To control black ghetto violence, we must disarm everyone else, too!"

Crickets from Trump, but then he says "Black communities suffer most from violent crime!"

So of course she goes "You're a racist to point out those obvious statistical truths!"
Lying pandering race-dividing baiting bitch.

Finally, Trump couldn't even snipe back at the "neutral" debate moderator, Dindu Holt!

Holt: "But you trashed Hillary's 'unpresidential' LOOK (i.e: not only her 'stamina!)!"

Trump SHOULD HAVE SAID: Yeah, I said she LOOKS like she has no stamina!"

When she said he didn't release his tax returns; he should have said "Clinton Foundation!"

;-)

Sunday, September 25, 2016

Still Think North Korea Is Bad?

North Korean Humor... 

Kim Jung Un had NO military experience whatsoever before Daddy made him a four-star general.
This snot-nosed twerp had never accomplished anything in his life that would even come close to military leadership.
 He hadn't even so much as led a Cub Scout troop, coached a sports team, or commanded a military platoon.
So he is made the "Beloved Leader" Of North Korea.
 Terrific!
Oh nuts!  I'm sorry...
 I just remembered that we did the same thing. 
http://www.multiart.no/humor/bilder/barack_obama_caricature.jpg
We took an arrogant phony community organizer, who had never worn a uniform, never ran so much as an ice-cream stand, and made him Commander-in-Chief.
A guy, who had never had a real job, worked on a budget, or led anything more than an ACORN demonstration, and we made him "Beloved Leader" of the United States - Twice!
So if you think North Koreans are stupid...
I'm sorry I brought this up....never mind!

Saturday, September 24, 2016

A Bloody Day of Muslim Refugee Terror

From here:

By  September 22, 2016 , 7:00 am

The wave of Muslim refugee terror began with a bomb targeting a U.S. Marine charity run in New Jersey. By evening a pressure cooker full of shrapnel has exploded outside a Manhattan building for the blind. An hour later, a rampaging Muslim terrorist began stabbing people inside a Macy’s, asking them if they were Muslim and shouting the name of “Allah,” the genocidal Islamic deity of mass murder.
And that was one Saturday, two Muslim refugees and a wave of national terror 1,200 miles apart.
What did Elizabeth, New Jersey and St. Cloud, Minnesota have in common?
New Jersey has the second largest Muslim population in the country. This isn’t the first time it was used as a staging ground for Muslim terror.
11 of the 19 September 11 hijackers hung out in Paterson (known colloquially as Paterstine). Head toward Jersey City and you can see where Muslim enemies of this country stood on rooftops and cheered the attacks on September 11. It’s also where the World Trade Center bombing mastermind and the Blind Sheikh who provided religious guidance for a proposed wave of Islamic terror operated.
Go south and in Elizabeth you can pass the First American Fried Chicken joint where the Rahami clan made life miserable for their American neighbors before one of their spawn began his bombing spree.
New Jersey is a map of Muslim terror plots because of its huge Muslim population.
Ahmad Khan Rahami came to America as the son of an Afghan refugee. He stabbed a man two years ago. His family was a local nuisance who cried “Islamophobia” at the least provocation. His brother was a Jihadi sympathizer and may have fled the country after assaulting a police officer. By the time Ahmad was done, he had wounded a police officer and 29 other people. If his plot had succeeded, he might have pulled off the largest Muslim terror atrocity in the country since September 11.
Sadly, Syrian Muslim “refugees” continued to be dumped in Elizabeth, NJ to seed the next wave of Muslim terror. The International Rescue Committee, one of the two largest migrant agencies plaguing the Garden State, is based in Elizabeth, 8 minutes away from the Rahimi chicken place.
Last year Erol Kekic, the head of the group, insisted that the issue would “blow over.” Instead of blowing over, it’s blowing up.
Minnesota has suffered from the presence of the largest Somali migrant population in the country. And so a state which used to be known for its Swedish and German immigrants instead became a recruiting ground for ISIS and Al-Shabab. Al-Shabab, which is aligned with Al Qaeda, attacked the Westgate mall in Kenya a few years ago. The Somali killers quizzed their victims to distinguish Muslims from non-Muslims.
Dahir Adan, the Somali Muslim migrant who invaded America from a refugee camp in Kenya, attempted to duplicate that attack, asking those he stabbed at the Crossroads Mall if they were Muslims.
Dozens of Somali migrants in America have joined Al-Shabab and ISIS. The only difference between Dahir Adan and them is that instead of getting on a plane back to his native Somalia to join the local Jihadists, he carried out his Jihad against the nighttime shoppers in a Macy’s.
The Crossroads attack was the tragic price paid by innocent people for Muslim refugee resettlement.
Muslim Somali migration dramatically increased under Obama, rising from 2,500 in 2008 to around 8,000 and 9,000 in the last few years. Somali settlers represent almost 1 percent of the population of Minnesota. Most of the “refugees” dumped in St. Cloud were Somalis migrants and Lutheran Social Services has taken the lead in inflicting Somalis on the unfortunate natives of St. Cloud.
From the very beginning of their arrival, the Somali colonists were a problem for the people of St. Cloud. They displaced American workers and clashed with the native population. In this decade, St. Cloud has become 10% Somali. The Crossroads attack was the inevitable result of that demographic growth.
What happened in New Jersey and Minnesota is the same thing that has been happening in Europe. Islamic terrorism is caused by Muslim migration. As the Muslim population grows, so does its terror.
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton had declared that the Somali occupation of the state is here to stay. “Minnesota is not like it was 30, 50 years ago,” he sneered. “Anybody who cannot accept your right to be here should find another state.”
Now Dayton has condemned the “religious bigotry” that motivated the Crossroads attack and declared that, “There is no place in Minnesota for intolerance of all Americans’ constitutional right to worship according to their beliefs.”
But the preferred mode of worship of Dahir Adan came from the religious book that he listed as his favorite, the Koran. “Slay the idolaters wherever you find them,” (Koran 9:5), “Strike upon the necks and strike from them every fingertip,” (Koran 8:12) and “Fight them until there is no unbelief and the religion, all of it, is for Allah” (Koran 8:39). Islamic worship is murdering those who exercise religious freedom. That’s what Dahir Adan was doing at the mall when he asked his victims if they were Muslims.
You can have religious freedom or Islam. You can have the Constitution or the Koran. But you can’t have both.
“I ask everyone in the St. Cloud area and throughout Minnesota to rise above this atrocity and act to make religious and racial tolerance one of the ways in which Minnesotans again lead our country,” Governor Dayton has said. If he and other Minnesotans really want religious tolerance, then the only possible way to achieve it is by ending the disastrous settlement of Somali Muslims in Minnesota.
The anniversary of September 11 has come and gone. And we have learned nothing from the experience. The cesspools of Muslim terror in New Jersey have only grown. And no amount of moments of silence will clean them up. The latest terror plot in New York City originates from the same swamp.
Meanwhile peaceful states like Minnesota have become terror hubs through refugee resettlement.
Refugee resettlement is becoming our biggest terror threat. Obama wants to hike next year’s refugee admissions to 110,000. That’s a 57% increase since 2015. The summer’s statistics showed that more Muslims were being admitted as refugees than Christians.
This weekend’s wave of terror is the result of our refugee policy. And that policy is getting worse.

Another "Black Lies Martyr" THUG IS DEAD!

David Horowitz Freedom Center

Protest Thugs and the Real Evil in Charlotte
Nothing says "family man" like assaulting women and children. 

September 23, 2016
Daniel Greenfield

Keith Lamont Scott was scum.

He had been convicted of assault with a deadly weapon in two different states and convicted of assault in three states. He had been hit with "assault with intent to kill" charges in the 90s. His record of virtue included "assault on a child under 12" and "assault on a female."

The media spin; "Family and neighbors call Scott a quiet 'family man.'"

Nothing says "quiet" like "assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill" and nothing says "family man" like assaulting women and children.

Keith Lamont Scott, the latest martyr of Black Lives Matter and its media propaganda corps, was shot while waving a gun around. He had spent 7 years in jail for "aggravated assault with a deadly weapon."

This vicious monster's career of crime ended when he was shot by Brentley Vinson, an African-American police officer, protecting himself from the latest rampage by this "quiet family man."

Brentley Vinson is everything that Scott isn't. The son of a police officer, Brentley dreamed of following in his father's footsteps. He used to organize his football team's bible studies and mentored younger players. Former teammates describe him as a "great guy" with "good morals." His former coach calls him a "natural leader" and says that, "We need more Brent Vinsons... in our communities."

Except that Obama, Black Lives Matter, the media, the NAACP and everyone else going after this bright and decent African-American officer has decided that what we really need are more Keith Lamont Scotts. And the streets of Charlotte are full of "Scotts" throwing rocks at police, assaulting reporters and wrecking everything in sight in marches that are as "peaceful" as Scott was a "quiet family man."

That's what Hillary Clinton wanted when she tweeted that, "We have two names to add to a long list of African-Americans killed by police officers. It's unbearable, and it needs to become intolerable."

What exactly should be intolerable? An African-American police officer defending his life against a violent criminal who happened to be black? Should black criminals enjoy a special immunity? The greatest victims of black criminals are black communities.

Whom does Hillary Clinton imagine she's helping here? Instead of standing with heroic African-American police officers like Vinson, she's championing criminal scum like Scott.

Tim Kaine, Hillary's No. 2, wants us to think about Scott's family. We should do that. Scott's brother announced on camera that all "white people" are "devils." Timmy should check to see if he can get an exemption from white devildom. But if there are any white devils, it's men like Kaine and women like Hillary who enable the worst behavior in a troubled community while punishing those who try to help.

Every time the lie about "peaceful" protests is repeated, another black community becomes unlivable.

Twenty police officers have been injured and National Guard troops have arrived to deal with all those "peaceful" protests. Protesters chanted, "Black Lives Matter" and "Hands Up, Don't Shoot" before throwing things at police and then peacefully shooting each other. Stores had their windows broken and decorated with Black Lives Matter graffiti. A Walmart was peacefully looted and trucks were torched.

A police officer was peacefully hit by a car. Another was peacefully hit in the face with a rock. Mobs besieged and attempted to break into hotels. Reporters were attacked and a photographer was nearly thrown into a fire. White people were targeted by the racist Black Lives Matter mob and assaulted.

But all these peaceful rioters are probably just quiet family men too.

The peaceful protests are as big a lie as the "bookish" Keith Lamont Scott reading a book in his car. Police had no trouble finding a gun. They couldn't have found Scott anywhere near a book. The only thing he could have done with a book is try to beat someone to death with it. Maybe a child.

Scott wasn't a quiet family man; he was a violent criminal with a horrifying vicious streak. He and the rest of the Black Lives Matter rioters remind us of the monsters that we need dedicated police officers to protect us from.

The spin on what happened between a deranged black criminal and a courageous black police officer fell apart as fast as the Freddie Gray case, where black police officers were targeted and a city terrorized over conspiracy theories relating to the accidental death of a drug dealer.

The claims of racism are absurd. Not only was Scott shot by an African-American police officer, but Charlotte Police Chief Kerr Putney, who has taken the lead in defending him, is also African-American.



Are we supposed to believe that an African-American police officer and an African-American police chief are racists or that these two black men took the lead in a genocidal conspiracy to kill black men?

That's the laughable premise of the racist Black Lives Matter hatefest that alternates between "Stop killing us" street theater and violent assaults on police officers, reporters and anyone in the area.

But the truth doesn't matter. Black Lives Matter rioters are still chanting, "Hands Up, Don't Shoot" long after the Michael Brown lie fell apart. They're holding up signs reading, "It Was a Book." The lie is backed by some of the biggest media corporations in the country, by $130 million from George Soros and the Ford Foundation, by Barack Hussein Obama and by Hillary Clinton.

These are the malign forces destroying Charlotte, as they trashed Baltimore. On the ground there are the vulture community organizers of Black Lives Matter, funded by the left, who parachute in to organize race riots, behind them are the reporters who sell the spin live on the air and the photographers who capture glamor shots of the racist rioters, and after them come the lawyers of the DOJ out to ruin, terrorize and intimidate whatever law enforcement survived the riots.

They did it in Ferguson and a dozen other places. Now they want to do it in Charlotte.

They want to do it because they hate white people and black people. They hate peace and decency. They hate the idea of people getting up in the morning and working for a living. They hate the idea of good officers, white and black men and women, like Brentley Vinson, who genuinely believe in doing the right thing. They want unearned power. They demand unearned wealth. And they thrive on destruction.

This is the real evil in Charlotte. And we need to stand up to it. From the ghetto to the manors of the liberal elite from burning cars to pricey restaurants in exclusive neighborhoods, it plots against us.

It is a lie repeated a million times. Sometimes the lie is simple. Other times it's sophisticated. But the way to fight it is to begin with the truth.

The truth is that Keith Lamont Scott was a violent criminal who came to a bad end because of his own actions. Just like Michael Brown, Freddie Gray and too many other Black Lives Matter martyrs to count.

The truth is that everything Black Lives Matter does reminds us of why we need police officers.

The truth is that this is not about race, but about those who want to build and those who want to destroy. It's about the difference between Brentley Vinson and Keith Lamont Scott.

It's about what kind of country we want to be. Is it a country that celebrates a young black football player who chose to follow in his father's footsteps, who organized bible study and helped others, who risked his life to keep other people safe. Or is it one that celebrates Keith Lamont Scott, who assaulted a woman, a child and anyone else he could get at, who terrorized three states and died as he lived.

Obama and the left want a nation of Keith Lamont Scotts. But now it's our turn to choose.

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam. 

Another "Black Lies Martyr" THUG IS DEAD!

David Horowitz Freedom Center

Protest Thugs and the Real Evil in Charlotte
Nothing says "family man" like assaulting women and children. 

September 23, 2016
Daniel Greenfield

Keith Lamont Scott was scum.

He had been convicted of assault with a deadly weapon in two different states and convicted of assault in three states. He had been hit with "assault with intent to kill" charges in the 90s. His record of virtue included "assault on a child under 12" and "assault on a female."

The media spin; "Family and neighbors call Scott a quiet 'family man.'"

Nothing says "quiet" like "assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill" and nothing says "family man" like assaulting women and children.

Keith Lamont Scott, the latest martyr of Black Lives Matter and its media propaganda corps, was shot while waving a gun around. He had spent 7 years in jail for "aggravated assault with a deadly weapon."

This vicious monster's career of crime ended when he was shot by Brentley Vinson, an African-American police officer, protecting himself from the latest rampage by this "quiet family man."

Brentley Vinson is everything that Scott isn't. The son of a police officer, Brentley dreamed of following in his father's footsteps. He used to organize his football team's bible studies and mentored younger players. Former teammates describe him as a "great guy" with "good morals." His former coach calls him a "natural leader" and says that, "We need more Brent Vinsons... in our communities."

Except that Obama, Black Lives Matter, the media, the NAACP and everyone else going after this bright and decent African-American officer has decided that what we really need are more Keith Lamont Scotts. And the streets of Charlotte are full of "Scotts" throwing rocks at police, assaulting reporters and wrecking everything in sight in marches that are as "peaceful" as Scott was a "quiet family man."

That's what Hillary Clinton wanted when she tweeted that, "We have two names to add to a long list of African-Americans killed by police officers. It's unbearable, and it needs to become intolerable."

What exactly should be intolerable? An African-American police officer defending his life against a violent criminal who happened to be black? Should black criminals enjoy a special immunity? The greatest victims of black criminals are black communities.

Whom does Hillary Clinton imagine she's helping here? Instead of standing with heroic African-American police officers like Vinson, she's championing criminal scum like Scott.

Tim Kaine, Hillary's No. 2, wants us to think about Scott's family. We should do that. Scott's brother announced on camera that all "white people" are "devils." Timmy should check to see if he can get an exemption from white devildom. But if there are any white devils, it's men like Kaine and women like Hillary who enable the worst behavior in a troubled community while punishing those who try to help.

Every time the lie about "peaceful" protests is repeated, another black community becomes unlivable.

Twenty police officers have been injured and National Guard troops have arrived to deal with all those "peaceful" protests. Protesters chanted, "Black Lives Matter" and "Hands Up, Don't Shoot" before throwing things at police and then peacefully shooting each other. Stores had their windows broken and decorated with Black Lives Matter graffiti. A Walmart was peacefully looted and trucks were torched.

A police officer was peacefully hit by a car. Another was peacefully hit in the face with a rock. Mobs besieged and attempted to break into hotels. Reporters were attacked and a photographer was nearly thrown into a fire. White people were targeted by the racist Black Lives Matter mob and assaulted.

But all these peaceful rioters are probably just quiet family men too.

The peaceful protests are as big a lie as the "bookish" Keith Lamont Scott reading a book in his car. Police had no trouble finding a gun. They couldn't have found Scott anywhere near a book. The only thing he could have done with a book is try to beat someone to death with it. Maybe a child.

Scott wasn't a quiet family man; he was a violent criminal with a horrifying vicious streak. He and the rest of the Black Lives Matter rioters remind us of the monsters that we need dedicated police officers to protect us from.

The spin on what happened between a deranged black criminal and a courageous black police officer fell apart as fast as the Freddie Gray case, where black police officers were targeted and a city terrorized over conspiracy theories relating to the accidental death of a drug dealer.

The claims of racism are absurd. Not only was Scott shot by an African-American police officer, but Charlotte Police Chief Kerr Putney, who has taken the lead in defending him, is also African-American.

Are we supposed to believe that an African-American police officer and an African-American police chief are racists or that these two black men took the lead in a genocidal conspiracy to kill black men?

That's the laughable premise of the racist Black Lives Matter hatefest that alternates between "Stop killing us" street theater and violent assaults on police officers, reporters and anyone in the area.

But the truth doesn't matter. Black Lives Matter rioters are still chanting, "Hands Up, Don't Shoot" long after the Michael Brown lie fell apart. They're holding up signs reading, "It Was a Book." The lie is backed by some of the biggest media corporations in the country, by $130 million from George Soros and the Ford Foundation, by Barack Hussein Obama and by Hillary Clinton.

These are the malign forces destroying Charlotte, as they trashed Baltimore. On the ground there are the vulture community organizers of Black Lives Matter, funded by the left, who parachute in to organize race riots, behind them are the reporters who sell the spin live on the air and the photographers who capture glamor shots of the racist rioters, and after them come the lawyers of the DOJ out to ruin, terrorize and intimidate whatever law enforcement survived the riots.

They did it in Ferguson and a dozen other places. Now they want to do it in Charlotte.

They want to do it because they hate white people and black people. They hate peace and decency. They hate the idea of people getting up in the morning and working for a living. They hate the idea of good officers, white and black men and women, like Brentley Vinson, who genuinely believe in doing the right thing. They want unearned power. They demand unearned wealth. And they thrive on destruction.

This is the real evil in Charlotte. And we need to stand up to it. From the ghetto to the manors of the liberal elite from burning cars to pricey restaurants in exclusive neighborhoods, it plots against us.

It is a lie repeated a million times. Sometimes the lie is simple. Other times it's sophisticated. But the way to fight it is to begin with the truth.

The truth is that Keith Lamont Scott was a violent criminal who came to a bad end because of his own actions. Just like Michael Brown, Freddie Gray and too many other Black Lives Matter martyrs to count.

The truth is that everything Black Lives Matter does reminds us of why we need police officers.

The truth is that this is not about race, but about those who want to build and those who want to destroy. It's about the difference between Brentley Vinson and Keith Lamont Scott.

It's about what kind of country we want to be. Is it a country that celebrates a young black football player who chose to follow in his father's footsteps, who organized bible study and helped others, who risked his life to keep other people safe. Or is it one that celebrates Keith Lamont Scott, who assaulted a woman, a child and anyone else he could get at, who terrorized three states and died as he lived.

Obama and the left want a nation of Keith Lamont Scotts. But now it's our turn to choose.

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam. 

Thursday, September 22, 2016

Lib Media Pressures Moderators to Ambush Trump at Debates!

From MRC:

Working the Refs: Journalists Push Debate Moderators to Be Tougher on Trump 

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/geoffrey-dickens/2016/09/21/working-refs-journalists-push-moderators-be-tougher-trump

CNN's Chris Cuomo: Trump Is the ‘Problem,’ Hillary Needs to Be ‘Better’ Than That

He says: "Hillary didn't do anything illegal with her emails!" 

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/scott-whitlock/2016/09/21/cuomo-trump-problem-hillary-needs-be-better

Ellen Whines Over ‘Amazing’ Hillary Being Held to ‘Different Standard’

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/kyle-drennen/2016/09/21/ellen-whines-over-amazing-hillary-being-held-different-standard

Saturday, September 17, 2016

Is HILLARY DEAD ?

(H/T Herbork)

;-)

From:

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/09/17/bill-and-hillary-clinton-sell-access-and-influence-under-the-guise-of-a-birthday-bash/#comment-2951813

The Devilbat says:
Note that Hillary missed the party. I believe the ABC NEWS report about her death by Joe Torre on Sunday 9-11 was accurate. Aside from Torres report, the ABC NEWS website had a picture of her at the memorial service. The wording below stated, “Hillary Clinton died under care at Montefiore Hospital in the Bronx.” The hospital is directly on the route to the Clinton residence in Chappaqua NY. My guess is that she was being taken there and went critical en route. It is highly likely that the democrats will try to run one of her body doubles, commit massive voter fraud and then of course put Bill clinton back in the white house as the first gentleman with faux Hillary making the occasional appearance. He will be easy to control as he in the early – mid stages of dementia.
INFOWARS RAN IT, TOO:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNBRZX-f9MQ

http://madworldnews.com/wabc-reports-hillary-death/

A local New York news station opened their Sunday night broadcast with their anchor saying, “Breaking news is coming in of Hillary Clinton’s death.” The broadcast happened just hours after Hillary collapsed at the 9/11 Memorial, and a few New Yorkers caught the televised report on video. WABC-TV is now shockingly admitting that it was no hoax and revealing what led them to report Hillary dead.



Hillary Clinton (left), Joe Torre & Sandra Brooks reported Hillary was dead on Sunday 9/11/16 (right)
With so much speculation going on about Hillary Clinton’s health, it seemed like a hoax when a video popped up late Sunday night showing WABC-TV news anchor Joe Torre opening the broadcast by saying, “Good evening, I’m Joe Torre. We begin this evening news with reports of Hillary Clinton’s death…” The video abruptly cuts off there as the news station cut the feed of the live program.
A few citizens caught it on video and posted it to YouTube, where it fueled further speculation about the Democratic candidate’s physical condition. How could a major local ABC news anchor read that line from a teleprompter? 

Was it a hoax? 

The answer is no.

After further investigation, Owen Shoroyer of InfoWars called the news station and the representative admitted that Joe Torre did say that line but that it was a mistake. When Shoroyer called WABC, he got this explanation from the news desk:
“Yes, that is accurate [that Torre reported Hillary’s death], it was an unfortunate mistake. She’s alive, she’s alive, I don’t know if he read it from the teleprompter, or what happened. So that is accurate you did hear that correctly, but I cannot say exactly what happened. We have been getting calls all day today about it.” [via YouTube]
This fuels further conspiracy theories about Hillary’s health and the events surrounding her collapse Sunday at the 9/11 Memorial. After Mad World News reported on the possibility that the Clinton campaign used a body double to emerge from Chelsea’s apartment following her collapse, further developments on the body double have come to light.
Teresa Barnwell, 61, of Palm Desert California makes her living as a Hillary Clinton body double. After rumors swirled that the woman who came out of Chelsea’s apartment only 45 minutes after Hillary had lost consciousness and was dragged into her black handicap van looked thinner and younger, Barnwell was identified as a possible choice to act as Hillary’s body double.
Barnwell’s website suddenly disappeared yesterday, but before it did, one social media user screen captured a page from her website that confirmed that, in June 2016, a Democratic Party leader in New York, who she describes as “very close and personal friends of Bill and Hillary Clinton,” contracted Barnwell to act as Hillary Clinton. The “gig” Barnwell described is rather odd.
“[T]he purpose of my job was to make 1,000 people believe the real Hillary Clinton had traveled to the camp to visit his longtime friend and his family [the Democratic leader] and to kickoff an annual competition that the camp announces every summer in a big way. I had at least ten cars in my motorcade with local police cars and the highway patrol…”
deplorable-on-twitter-heres-hillarysbodydouble-teresa_barnwell-claiming-she-was-contracted-to-double-for-hillary-last-june-https-t-co-svo8sxrnwi
The police involved in this event truly believed that Barnwell was Hillary Clinton. Her job, which the close personal friend of the Clintons hired her to do, was to make 1,000 people believe she was the real Hillary. Lying to the police and highway patrol proves this was more of a test run of sorts, to see if Barnwell could pull it off.
Barnwell’s website disappearing yesterday may be a coincidence — until you add all these things up:
  • Hillary’s very real medical emergency where she needed a hospital right away
  • Her miraculous recovery after 45 minutes when the press was intentionally left in the dark and had no way to follow the black handicap van
  • Having no Secret Service or any of her entourage around her when she left Chelsea’s apartment
  • Hillary body double’s website goes down, deleting any connection that she had with the Clintons

All of it adds up to some type of cover-up, but what they are covering up, besides Hillary being extremely ill, we do not know for sure. However, we do know that it’s par for the course when dealing with the Clinton criminal machine, and I do know, as a healthcare professional, that there is no way they took Hillary to Chelsea’s apartment and didn’t get her medical help right away after she lost consciousness.
Want to learn more? Just Google for " ABC NEWS report about Hillary's death by Joe Torres "

;-)


Friday, September 16, 2016

Obama's Real (Kenyan) Birth Certificate?

Judge for your selves!

Furthermore, Obama's own, SELF-written biography (aka public confession) clearly states that he was born in KENYA:



Wednesday, September 14, 2016

Obama Secretly Transferred $1.7 Billion to Iran to Keep It Out of Terror Victims’ Reach

From here:


Shurat HaDin: Obama Secretly Transferred $1.7 Billion to Iran to Keep It Out of Terror Victims’ Reach

Shurat HaDin-Israel Law Center, representing American the families of terror victims who have won US court judgments against the government of Iran for its support of Palestinian terrorist attacks in Israel, on Tuesday released a letter it sent US Congress members alleging that the Obama Administration kept secret the details of the $1.7 billion in cash payments to Tehran in January 2016 in order to evade efforts by their clients to recover those funds to satisfy outstanding court awards.
In the past, American terror victims have been successful in seizing Iranian bank accounts when those had been located.
The letter, sent by attorneys Nitsana Darshan-Leitner of Tel Aviv and Robert Tolchin of New York, recalls that on January 17, 2016, President Obama announced the settlement of a legal dispute between the United States and Iran over $400 million held by the US in a Foreign Military Sales (“FMS”) program account since 1979. The Obama Administration agreed to pay the $400 million it finally conceded it owed Iran, plus payment of an additional $1.3 million in interest on that amount.

image: http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/shurat-hadin.jpg
Administration witnesses before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations (Committee on Financial Services) hearing on “Fueling Terror: The Dangers of Ransom Payments to Iran,” Sept. 8, 2016. (Screenshot)
Administration witnesses before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations (Committee on Financial Services) hearing on “Fueling Terror: The Dangers of Ransom Payments to Iran,” Sept. 8, 2016. (Screenshot)

Then, “in recent weeks, the $1.7 billion which was secretly paid out in cash has come under severe scrutiny because the timing and circumstances of the payments appear to confirm the Iranian claim that the White House agreed to pay the money as ransom to Tehran for the release of American hostages.”
However, in light of the recent revelations in a Congressional subcommittee hearing held on Thursday, September 8, 2016, Shurat HaDin is asserting that “it is now clear that the Administration has deliberately kept numerous payments to Iran secret in order to shield Iran from having to forfeit those funds to pay terror victims amounts Iran owes under outstanding US judgments.”
The Shurat HaDin letter cites a “suspicious revelation at the Congressional subcommittee hearing that the United States and Iran did not draft a written settlement agreement or any other formal documentation of the cash transfers, and that Iran specifically directed the Iran-US Tribunal at the Hague, where the claim was to be resolved through arbitration, that it should not record the settlement of the claim for the parties.”

Shurat HaDin asserts that under a legislation passed in 2000, the US was legally entitled to apply the $400 million in the FSM account to satisfy terror victims’ judgments, and this way eliminating the $400 million balance and nearly 16 years of interest claimed by Iran.
Shurat HaDin President Nitsana Darshan-Leitner said in a statement: “We believe that the secrecy in which these cash payments were made was part of an effort by the White House to conceal these payments from the terror victims and to hide the fact that it was effectively canceling Iran’s debt for its terror-related activity. This is a horrible fraud against the terror victims. It appears the secret cash transfers were specifically done as an end run around the ability of the families to attach the money and enforce their federal court judgments.”
“Why didn’t the Treasury ever tell the families they were holding these funds?” Darshan-Leitner demanded to know.
Had either the settlement or an award against the United States at the Iran-US Tribunal been entered on the books, and Iran had sought to have the settlement or award confirmed in US court, then terror victims with judgments against Iran could have legally “attached” any judgment affirming the settlement or award, so that the amount could be applied to satisfy their terror compensation judgments, Shurat HaDin contends, explaining that “instead, the Administration went to great lengths to ensure that the $1.7 billion purported settlement was shrouded in secrecy, was never reduced to writing or even recorded with the Tribunal in Hague, and was paid to Iran in cash as quickly and directly as possible in order to head off any chance that Iran would be forced to forfeit any amount to pay legal judgments it owes to American terror victims.”
Shurat HaDin urged Congress to continue to investigate these issues, and to take action to guarantee that further payments to Iran do not take place as long as Iran remains a state sponsor of terrorism and a threat to its neighbors, “and until it has paid every judgment it owes to American victims of terror.”
Nitsana Darshan-Leitner addressed her letter to Senator Marco Rubio and Representatives Mike Pompeo and Ed Royce, who have each introduced legislation in response to the $1.7 billion payment to Iran, and to House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling and Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee Chairman Sean P. Duffy, whose subcommittee held a special hearing on the $1.7 billion payments last Thursday, September 8, 2016.