I think the banksters want another war, because since they fund both
sides, whoever wins, owes them, and whoever loses, owes the winner (who
owes them). And they also not only get to increase their profits by it,
but they also get to reduce the world's populations while suckering the
survivors into demanding the banksters cement their own control by
taking over as a world government. It's win/win for them, and a very
scary lose/lose scenario for us.
And their bought-and-paid for pawns, our so-called "leaders," will never lift a finger to stop them.
Why?
Because it's always all about the money, and the illusion of control over others it brings.
Banksters are criminal frauds, operating on a global scale.
Banksters "own" all the deeds and debts of all the other false idolatrous entities OFFICIALLY called "the legal fictions of the corporate persons."
Not only do these vile sales-masters sell money (which obviously instantly devalues not only that money, but the labour and goods it re-presents as well) but they have also "allowed" them selves, through the last two centuries of bribing their political sales-puppets, the luxurious indulgence in outright FRAUD called "fractional reserves," whereby their mouths literally write checks their pockets can't cash; they literally print money out of thin air; up to 50 times (5,000%) what they actually have in their reserves. "Fractional Reserves" = criminal COUNTERFEITING, people!
Repeat endlessly, compounding this crime, year after year, and century after century. And, unlike real-world, cause-and-effect investments, they charge idolatrous interest regardless of real economic activity; interest IS inflation. Fraud IS theft, and, so far as I know, theft is still a crime. In fact, all crimes are forms of theft.
The banksters always finance BOTH sides of EVERY conflict, because then the winners still owe them AND so do the losers; THEY never lose, and the only frontiers left are the destruction and "reconstruction" of all existing countries!
America didn't fare so well under its own "reconstruction" costs, so why should we help the foreign banksters to inflict the same on anyone - much less on everyone - else, too?!
Bottom line:
Banksters ARE evil (because they sell money, which obviously and instantly dilutes the value of that money, the labour used to earn it, and the worth of the goods it can buy; interest IS inflation).
Just picture a political leader telling the banks they are out of business. They would quickly round up an army of unemployed assassins and offer ridiculously huge bribes to the leaders' own staff to betray him and leave him open to assassination. The only way the banks can be removed is AFTER they've already fallen and their money is completely worthless.
Now, let's also examine what the banksters are telling their complicit minions and all-too-willing accessory stooges:
GLOBALISM, ("AGENDA21") JEALOUSY AND NATIONALISM - IS THERE REALLY ANY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THEM?!
(THE SHORT ANSSWER IS: NO)!
IS JEALOUSY A RIGHT, OR A CRIME? IT'S REALLY ONLY BACKWARDS, VICTIM-BLAMING CRIMINAL NONSENSICAL SLANDER. AND IT'S OFFENSIVE TO PRETEND JEALOUSY IS THE NATURE OF THE HUMAN'S GOD.
Liberals have been taught the fallacy that the idea of "nations" is what has always caused all past wars - the simple and "jealous" struggle for other's territory.
Furthermore, they think that only all the white people, including the Jews, invented the idea of property and territory; that innocent nomadic savages who believe in tribal collectivism are better than greedy individualists who want to horde (and improve!) personal property! To them, nationalism began during the Enlightenment.
But the simple truth is, nations were all formed naturally and organically from families, clans, and tribes, and eventually become states and empires over time.
So, naturally (being tool-blaming idolaters) leftists then decided to destroy all sovereign nations, to prevent all futue wars: "no nations = no wars for same!"
It's like saying people will fight over diamonds, or food - so the liberals' "solution" is do destroy all the diamonds and poison all the food, FIRST.
THEN THERE WILL BE "PEACE!"
Exactly like with islam, which pretends all hope is fraud, (since the future cannot be known for sure), so destroy the hope and Submit to fear, and there will be the certainty of eternal, static "PEACE!"
;-(
And also exactly like islam, the liberals want to destroy the "idols" - people's ties to their families, gods, and past, in order to prevent circumstantial "jealousy!"
i.e: If people don't live in "houses" (nations) then some criminally lazy people won't be jealous of all the work other, "privileged" people put into fixing theirs up!
;-|
LIBERAL COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITY CAMPUSES ONLY "TEACH" (ABUSE KIDS THESE DAYS WITH) SEDITION!
Like their globalist bankster donors, owners and sponsors, they are against all sovereign national governments!
And, as such, their curriculums should be gone over with a fine-tooth comb ASAP! Sedition/treason is still a CRIME, as far as I know, (delinquent governmental notice and enforcement against it notwithstanding).
Further, they plan to eliminate "RACISM" by blending all the "races" (especially the Whites) into ONE RACE!
And, far from really believing in "Diversity," they only use that cry as a temporary bludgeon, to make sure all the 'races' which are currently minorities IN NORTH AMERICA AND EUROPE, become the majority there. Note how liberals don't attack the Chinese or Japanese for being isolationist "racists" (which they proudly are) or demand hordes of negroes emigrate to Japan of China? Do they demand that the Blacks in Africa self-dilute with Asians?
Liberals want to eradicate "greed" by destroying property rights, and to do that, they must destroy individualism, human dignity and self-reliance, and make people into infantile dependants.
This is what their fear-focused, self-defeating masochism and the desire to ignore all cause-and-effect who-started-it free-will choice, to make it all stop, leads to!
ONLY CRIMINALS THINK THIS WAY - THAT JEALOUSY IS A LEGITIMATE REASON TO ATTACK OTHERS; THAT THE SELF-INFLICTED POVERTY CAUSED BY CRIMINAL CHOICES, "CAUSES" THE CRIME!
i.e: "If you didn't live in such a nice house, then I wouldnt be jealous of it! So, since you bothered to earn that house and I didn't, you have to either let me live in it with you for free, or destroy it because it hurts my feelings and I have a right to not be offended by the painful truth that I'm a lazy criminal! It's your fault!
This of course blames the victim's property (and the fact that the criminal's victim actually owns property) for the criminal's own desire to steal or destroy it.
But of course, no amount of force or police or laws are necessary among free citizens who can and will govern themselves, while the opposite is: no amount of force or police or laws are enough for a people who CANNOT - or will not - govern themselves.
;-)
The problem lies with the "liberal" (criminal's) fears of others being "better than them," and their "jealousy," not with other people being able to own things.
THEY ARE STILL IDOLATERS - BLAMING THE ITEMS, TOOLS AND IMAGES FOR THEIR OWN CRIMINAL DESIRES AND ACTIONS.
"BAN GUNS! BAN PERSONAL PROPERTY OF ALL KINDS! BAN "NATIONS!" THEN WE WON'T HAVE TO BE JEALOUS OF YOUR STUFF ANY MORE, AND WE WON'T "HAVE" TO ATTACK YOU FIRST, SO THERE WILL FINALLY BE "PEACE!""
" ... er ... we meant to say: "If you didn't have any guns or the "nations" from which to launch the wars we know you'll launch against us, you couldn't do it, SO we must attack you and take your guns and nations away from you first, before you can inevitably do the same to us!
The "Historical Predeterminism" made us do it to you before you could inevitably do it to us, you evil criminals!"
i.e: "YOUR STUFF MADE ME WANT TO STEAL IT!!!"
("IF YOU DIDN'T HAVE STUFF, I WOULDN'T "HAVE TO" STEAL IT, OR ATTACK YOU, YOU EVIL RICH HARDWORKING BASTARDS! YOUR STUFF MAKES ME FEEL BAD ABOUT BEING A LAZY CROOK")!
CRIMINAL MASOCHISTS ALWAYS WANT TO CREATE AND JOIN THE LARGEST GANGS BECAUSE THEY ARE AFRAID NOT TO, WHILE SLANDERING EVERYONE ELSE AS BEING ABOUT TO ATTACK THEM FIRST!
;-(
And their bought-and-paid for pawns, our so-called "leaders," will never lift a finger to stop them.
Why?
Because it's always all about the money, and the illusion of control over others it brings.
Banksters are criminal frauds, operating on a global scale.
Banksters "own" all the deeds and debts of all the other false idolatrous entities OFFICIALLY called "the legal fictions of the corporate persons."
Not only do these vile sales-masters sell money (which obviously instantly devalues not only that money, but the labour and goods it re-presents as well) but they have also "allowed" them selves, through the last two centuries of bribing their political sales-puppets, the luxurious indulgence in outright FRAUD called "fractional reserves," whereby their mouths literally write checks their pockets can't cash; they literally print money out of thin air; up to 50 times (5,000%) what they actually have in their reserves. "Fractional Reserves" = criminal COUNTERFEITING, people!
Repeat endlessly, compounding this crime, year after year, and century after century. And, unlike real-world, cause-and-effect investments, they charge idolatrous interest regardless of real economic activity; interest IS inflation. Fraud IS theft, and, so far as I know, theft is still a crime. In fact, all crimes are forms of theft.
The banksters always finance BOTH sides of EVERY conflict, because then the winners still owe them AND so do the losers; THEY never lose, and the only frontiers left are the destruction and "reconstruction" of all existing countries!
America didn't fare so well under its own "reconstruction" costs, so why should we help the foreign banksters to inflict the same on anyone - much less on everyone - else, too?!
Bottom line:
Banksters ARE evil (because they sell money, which obviously and instantly dilutes the value of that money, the labour used to earn it, and the worth of the goods it can buy; interest IS inflation).
Just picture a political leader telling the banks they are out of business. They would quickly round up an army of unemployed assassins and offer ridiculously huge bribes to the leaders' own staff to betray him and leave him open to assassination. The only way the banks can be removed is AFTER they've already fallen and their money is completely worthless.
Now, let's also examine what the banksters are telling their complicit minions and all-too-willing accessory stooges:
GLOBALISM, ("AGENDA21") JEALOUSY AND NATIONALISM - IS THERE REALLY ANY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THEM?!
(THE SHORT ANSSWER IS: NO)!
IS JEALOUSY A RIGHT, OR A CRIME? IT'S REALLY ONLY BACKWARDS, VICTIM-BLAMING CRIMINAL NONSENSICAL SLANDER. AND IT'S OFFENSIVE TO PRETEND JEALOUSY IS THE NATURE OF THE HUMAN'S GOD.
Liberals have been taught the fallacy that the idea of "nations" is what has always caused all past wars - the simple and "jealous" struggle for other's territory.
Furthermore, they think that only all the white people, including the Jews, invented the idea of property and territory; that innocent nomadic savages who believe in tribal collectivism are better than greedy individualists who want to horde (and improve!) personal property! To them, nationalism began during the Enlightenment.
But the simple truth is, nations were all formed naturally and organically from families, clans, and tribes, and eventually become states and empires over time.
So, naturally (being tool-blaming idolaters) leftists then decided to destroy all sovereign nations, to prevent all futue wars: "no nations = no wars for same!"
It's like saying people will fight over diamonds, or food - so the liberals' "solution" is do destroy all the diamonds and poison all the food, FIRST.
THEN THERE WILL BE "PEACE!"
Exactly like with islam, which pretends all hope is fraud, (since the future cannot be known for sure), so destroy the hope and Submit to fear, and there will be the certainty of eternal, static "PEACE!"
;-(
And also exactly like islam, the liberals want to destroy the "idols" - people's ties to their families, gods, and past, in order to prevent circumstantial "jealousy!"
i.e: If people don't live in "houses" (nations) then some criminally lazy people won't be jealous of all the work other, "privileged" people put into fixing theirs up!
;-|
LIBERAL COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITY CAMPUSES ONLY "TEACH" (ABUSE KIDS THESE DAYS WITH) SEDITION!
Like their globalist bankster donors, owners and sponsors, they are against all sovereign national governments!
And, as such, their curriculums should be gone over with a fine-tooth comb ASAP! Sedition/treason is still a CRIME, as far as I know, (delinquent governmental notice and enforcement against it notwithstanding).
Further, they plan to eliminate "RACISM" by blending all the "races" (especially the Whites) into ONE RACE!
And, far from really believing in "Diversity," they only use that cry as a temporary bludgeon, to make sure all the 'races' which are currently minorities IN NORTH AMERICA AND EUROPE, become the majority there. Note how liberals don't attack the Chinese or Japanese for being isolationist "racists" (which they proudly are) or demand hordes of negroes emigrate to Japan of China? Do they demand that the Blacks in Africa self-dilute with Asians?
Liberals want to eradicate "greed" by destroying property rights, and to do that, they must destroy individualism, human dignity and self-reliance, and make people into infantile dependants.
This is what their fear-focused, self-defeating masochism and the desire to ignore all cause-and-effect who-started-it free-will choice, to make it all stop, leads to!
ONLY CRIMINALS THINK THIS WAY - THAT JEALOUSY IS A LEGITIMATE REASON TO ATTACK OTHERS; THAT THE SELF-INFLICTED POVERTY CAUSED BY CRIMINAL CHOICES, "CAUSES" THE CRIME!
i.e: "If you didn't live in such a nice house, then I wouldnt be jealous of it! So, since you bothered to earn that house and I didn't, you have to either let me live in it with you for free, or destroy it because it hurts my feelings and I have a right to not be offended by the painful truth that I'm a lazy criminal! It's your fault!
This of course blames the victim's property (and the fact that the criminal's victim actually owns property) for the criminal's own desire to steal or destroy it.
But of course, no amount of force or police or laws are necessary among free citizens who can and will govern themselves, while the opposite is: no amount of force or police or laws are enough for a people who CANNOT - or will not - govern themselves.
;-)
The problem lies with the "liberal" (criminal's) fears of others being "better than them," and their "jealousy," not with other people being able to own things.
THEY ARE STILL IDOLATERS - BLAMING THE ITEMS, TOOLS AND IMAGES FOR THEIR OWN CRIMINAL DESIRES AND ACTIONS.
"BAN GUNS! BAN PERSONAL PROPERTY OF ALL KINDS! BAN "NATIONS!" THEN WE WON'T HAVE TO BE JEALOUS OF YOUR STUFF ANY MORE, AND WE WON'T "HAVE" TO ATTACK YOU FIRST, SO THERE WILL FINALLY BE "PEACE!""
" ... er ... we meant to say: "If you didn't have any guns or the "nations" from which to launch the wars we know you'll launch against us, you couldn't do it, SO we must attack you and take your guns and nations away from you first, before you can inevitably do the same to us!
The "Historical Predeterminism" made us do it to you before you could inevitably do it to us, you evil criminals!"
i.e: "YOUR STUFF MADE ME WANT TO STEAL IT!!!"
("IF YOU DIDN'T HAVE STUFF, I WOULDN'T "HAVE TO" STEAL IT, OR ATTACK YOU, YOU EVIL RICH HARDWORKING BASTARDS! YOUR STUFF MAKES ME FEEL BAD ABOUT BEING A LAZY CROOK")!
CRIMINAL MASOCHISTS ALWAYS WANT TO CREATE AND JOIN THE LARGEST GANGS BECAUSE THEY ARE AFRAID NOT TO, WHILE SLANDERING EVERYONE ELSE AS BEING ABOUT TO ATTACK THEM FIRST!
;-(
4 comments:
Careful, Unk: don't suck so many pot heads and drug addicts, their blood will addle you ;)
Anarchy does not work; tried and proved unworkable. Fascism results in criminals holding and abusing excessive power. Limited self government is the only way, and it only works when fully implemented, with a vigilant and activated citizenry.
Money facilitates trade and commerce. Banks and stock corporations make it possible to share the risks and rewards of entrepreneurship. Without them, our modern economies would be impossible.
If money was still limited to the amount of Gold in existence, sure - but once freed from all reality the "fiat" currency enabled them to create it out of thin air, and then lend it to everyone to start the wars they use to consolidate their power.
Like I said above: banks really only SELL MONEY, which instantly devalues it, the labour used to earn it, and the good it pays for.
We don't need banks, either - the governments have historically printed the money, and in most civilized countries like Canada, (and unlike in the USA) they still do.
Also, nobody needs corporations to share the risks and rewards of entrepreneurship, either. Before such "legal" lies as these "Legal fictions of the corporate persons" existed, we had partnerships which got along just fine. In fact, the only reason 'corporations' exist, is as criminal conspiracies to defraud the public:
It's idolatry, where they pretend groups of individual persons are single people. In reality, it gives everyone in the "corporate" person a shield of fraud (obviously, a "legal fiction" is still really only an illegal LIE, no matter what they say it is) to hide behind; it basically only embodies the notion that:
"I didn't do it - ONLY The GROUP did it! Whee!"
It "legalizes" the false notion that people can have rights without responsibilities, just like all criminals want - the right to your stuff, without the responsibility for having to pay for or otherwise earn it. It legalizes theft through fraud. Lying is the most basic form of theft: it's the (at least, attempted) theft of the Truth. Since all crimes are forms of theft (non or pre-consensual transfer of property; aka attacking first) lying ("fraud") is a crime. That's also why so many corporations have 'LLC' after their names - it stands for "Limited Liability Corporation" (aka limited responsibility)! It means the might-makes-right force of the false "law" enables them to have the right to injure people without being held "legally" responsible for it.
In fact, ALL corporations start as pre-meditated conspiracies in this way:
Imagine if you or I went before a judge, and asked him: "Your honor, I want the right to take risks with other people's lives and other properties, for gains which will only accrue to my self!"
He'd probably tell us to get lost (at minimum) and maybe even charge us with conspiring in advance to commit fraud and other crimes, like blatant extortion.
But the second we join together into a group or GANG, and say "Your honor, WE want to do this!" he automatically rubber stamps our criminally negligent conspiracy, as a "corporate, legal" fiction!
CAPISCE?
Bottom line: corporations don't "share the risks," only the rewards. They exist to falsely divide responsibilities away from rights.
;-)
GPO prints the paper currency and the US Mint stamps the coins. The FED manipulates the stock market.
Hitching the value of money to a single scarce commodity has its problems, including restricting growth potential, inflation and George Soros tricks.
It's not "hitched" at all, it's just out in the open. Inflation is caused by charging "interest" in advance of actual real-world economic activity.
And Soros types' tricks seem far more likely to succeed under hidden fiat currency.
Post a Comment