Wednesday, February 21, 2024

The realities of survival prove the feminist power fantasy is delusional

These days we hear a lot about the concept of the "male power fantasy," usually about the feminist accusation of "toxic masculinity." In other words, feminists argue that the male power fantasy is a social construct that makes men aggressive, and aggression is supposedly the cause of most of society's ills.


However, if one studies the archetypal ideas of heroism (a hallmark of the male power fantasy), what we almost always find are stories of self-sacrifice. Power, for most men, is meant to be used in service to others; to protect and to provide for those who cannot protect themselves. This symbolism is found in literature, television and movies centered on powerful male figures time and time again. Rather than being "toxic," men are compelled by their relationship to power to achieve something greater for all the people around them.


This is not to say that there are no men with twisted motives. History is splattered with male rulers who have abused their authority and committed a host of atrocities. These men, however, are the exception to the rule. The majority of men fantasize about being heroes with a moral code, not villains.


The hero's journey usually requires a struggle to attain the power that will eventually be used by the man. It is at least subconsciously understood that power attained without experience and wisdom leads to corruption. In other words, for men, great power comes with great responsibility.





The female power fantasy, unfortunately, is very different. For feminists, great power means never having to take responsibility for anything ever.


When women with power are written by women (specifically feminists) or woke activists, you will see a considerable juxtaposition when it comes to how that power is attained and used. A female power fantasy does not require a woman to be a hero. In fact, they often act like villains; they tend to be selfish and narcissistic, and they lack depth and the redeeming qualities often associated with principled women. When women fantasize about power, they are more likely to reflect dark masculine qualities instead of nurturing feminine qualities.


There is no archetypal hero's journey for modern women. In popular culture, female icons usually gain power automatically without any struggle. They are born with magical abilities, magical or God-given talents, or they "manifest" power by sheer psychological will (the fantasy of witchcraft). They imagine what they want, and what they want is supposed to come to them magnetically.


In the past, such stories of female fantasies involved women using sexuality to influence men to do what they want (sexuality being the magical power). That said, this dynamic has long perturbed feminists who like the idea of sexual manipulation but don't like the idea of women still relying on men to project their "agency." So, in modern times, feminists have shifted female power more into the realm of men, with women acting like men, using force like men and asserting psychological dominance like men. 


Furthermore, the real source of magic for feminists is in controlling centers of society, the government being their holy grail.


But here's where things go awry. Women are not men and will never be capable of what men are capable of. That is to say, men can survive without women, but women will never be able to survive without men. It's a cold hard reality that feminists simply do not understand.





Woke activists like to claim with a certain tinge of glee that "the world is changing" and conservative men are angry because "the patriarchy is losing power." I find this argument fascinating because it is so self-contradictory:  If the patriarchy exists and men really are a monolithic power structure, then frankly, there is nothing stopping us from crushing feminists under our boots like bugs and taking all that power back.


Women, by virtue of their biology, have no power. At least not in the way that men do. Any power they think they have taken was actually given to them by men. Men allow women to have the freedoms they enjoy in the Western world, there is no power struggle. I'm sure some feminists will accuse me of chauvinism here, but this is a fact. Women have equal rights and opportunities to men in the West because men want them to. If there was a patriarchy, those rights would not exist.


Just look at any Muslim fundamentalist nation, where you will find real patriarchy. Feminists have no influence because the men in those societies do not allow them any. It just takes a flip of a switch, and all the power feminists think they have gained can be confiscated in an instant. So please ladies, don't delude yourselves and be thankful Western men are so inclined to appreciate and support the women around them.


The next most common argument from feminists is that women don't actually "need men." I think for first-wave feminists this was limited to the idea that women don't need men for personal happiness or personal success. That's debatable but I'm not really interested in whether or not feminists feel affirmed in their daily lives. The problem arises with third-wave feminism and the fantasy that women don't need men for anything, including the stability of society.


Let’s make this clear right up front: Men built almost everything in civilization. Men maintain almost everything in civilization. Everything you see around you, from the buildings to the roads to the utilities to the factories to national security, it's all built and kept running by men. All those ugly but necessary jobs that women don't want to do or are incapable of doing are done by men.


Feminists like to assert that women only need men for protection from other men. If men did not exist, they would be safe. This is a hilariously naive assumption, and it is only spoken by women in first-world societies where they have never been forced to experience true survival.


If men were to disappear tomorrow, civilization would collapse. Women might not have to worry about men, but they would have to worry about functioning in an environment without any amenities or modern comforts. They would not last more than a couple of weeks.


We know this for a fact because there have been multiple survival experiments in recent years with all-women groups that ended in disaster. They are either forced to rely on male groups to survive, or, they have to tap out and leave the experiment completely. A famous example is the old Bear Grylls battle of the sexes experiment, but it's not the only one and the results are generally the same across the board.


Feminists talk big, but they fold like wet paper when they're placed in a situation where they must legitimately struggle to live.


The world is an inhospitable place, especially without men. The feminist power fantasy relies on the notion that they are capable of doing whatever men can do. It's just not true, and the requirements are not limited to the physical. There is a dangerous lack of organizational ability among women, at least where completing concrete tasks is concerned.





In another famous example of an all-female experiment, in 2005 a female TV producer decided to build a media-based business from the ground up with only female employees. No men were allowed because she believed men had an easy ride. The company quickly imploded two years later due to lack of work ethic, lack of direction and infighting. The CEO admitted openly that an all-female staff was a terrible idea. She noted:

 

"While I stand by my initial reason for excluding male employees — because they have an easy ride in TV — if I were to do it again, I'd definitely employ men. In fact, I'd probably employ only men..."

 

My point is the feminist power fantasy can only exist in a first-world society where men have already built the majority of necessary amenities needed for survival. It is within these comfort-focused environments where feminists thrive, if only because women have so much time on their hands to ponder the little things rather than being concerned about what they will eat, where they live and who will keep them safe.





In a survival scenario, feminists cease to exist. They die, or they give up on feminism and seek the aid of men. It might be prudent for modern women in the West to keep this reality in mind because in the past, first-world countries have been known to fall into third-world status with shocking regularity.


To truth and knowledge,


Brandon Smith

Bob Livingston's Personal Liberty Media Group

Sunday, January 7, 2024

Ein jüdischer Überläufer warnt Amerika

SIE LASSEN DIESES NICHT LANGE BLEIBEN, ALSO HERUNTERLADEN ES, SOWIE SIE KÖNNEN!

Was erwartet uns jetzt? Wenn wir einen Weltkrieg auslösen, der sich zu einem Atomkrieg entwickeln könnte, ist die Menschheit am Ende. Warum könnte ein solcher Krieg stattfinden? Es wird stattfinden, während sich der Vorhang für Akt 3 hebt: Akt 1 war der Erste Weltkrieg, Akt 2 war der Zweite Weltkrieg, Akt 3 wird der Dritte Weltkrieg sein. Die Juden der Welt, die Zionisten und ihre Glaubensbrüder überall sind entschlossen, die Vereinigten Staaten erneut zu nutzen, um Palästina dauerhaft als Stützpunkt ihrer Weltregierung zu behalten. Das ist genauso wahr, wie ich hier stehe. Nicht nur ich habe es gelesen, sondern viele hier haben es auch gelesen, und es ist auf der ganzen Welt bekannt.

Ein jüdischer Überläufer warnt Amerika

Einleitende Anmerkung

 Benjamin H. Freedman war einer der faszinierendsten und erstaunlichsten Menschen des 20. Jahrhunderts. Er wurde 1890 geboren und war ein erfolgreicher jüdischer Geschäftsmann aus New York City und einst Haupteigentümer der Woodbury Soap Company. Nach dem jüdisch-kommunistischen Sieg von 1945 brach er mit dem organisierten Judentum und verbrachte den Rest seines Lebens und den Großteil seines beträchtlichen Vermögens, mindestens 2,5 Millionen Dollar, damit, die jüdische Tyrannei aufzudecken, die die Vereinigten Staaten erfasst hat.

Herr Freedman wusste, wovon er sprach, denn er war ein Insider auf höchster Ebene jüdischer Organisationen und jüdischer Machenschaften, um die Macht über unser Land zu erlangen. Herr Freedman war persönlich mit Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, John F. Kennedy und vielen weiteren Machern unserer Zeit bekannt.

Diese Rede wurde 1961 vor einem patriotischen Publikum im Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C. im Namen von Conde McGinleys damaliger patriotischer Zeitung „Common Sense“ gehalten. Auch wenn diese weitreichende und improvisierte Rede in mancherlei Hinsicht veraltet ist, ist die wesentliche Botschaft von Herrn Freedman an uns – seine Warnung an den Westen – dringlicher als je zuvor. -- K.A.S.

Benjamin Freedman spricht:

Hier in den Vereinigten Staaten haben die Zionisten und ihre Glaubensgenossen die vollständige Kontrolle über unsere Regierung. Aus vielen Gründen, zu zahlreich und zu komplex, um hier näher darauf einzugehen, regieren die Zionisten und ihre Glaubensbrüder diese Vereinigten Staaten, als wären sie die absoluten Monarchen dieses Landes. Nun mögen Sie sagen, das sei eine sehr weit gefasste Aussage, aber lassen Sie mich Ihnen zeigen, was passierte, während wir alle schliefen.

Was ist passiert? Im Sommer 1914 brach der Erste Weltkrieg aus. Es gibt hier nur wenige Menschen in meinem Alter, die sich daran erinnern. Nun wurde dieser Krieg einerseits von Großbritannien, Frankreich und Russland geführt; und auf der anderen Seite von Deutschland, Österreich-Ungarn und der Türkei.

Innerhalb von zwei Jahren hatte Deutschland diesen Krieg gewonnen: nicht nur nominell, sondern tatsächlich. Die für die Welt überraschenden deutschen U-Boote hatten alle Konvois aus dem Atlantik gefegt. Großbritannien stand da, ohne Munition für seine Soldaten, mit Lebensmittelvorräten für eine Woche – und danach Hungersnot. Damals hatte die französische Armee meutert. Sie hatten 600.000 der Blüte der französischen Jugend bei der Verteidigung von Verdun an der Somme verloren. Die russische Armee flüchtete, sie holten ihre Spielsachen und gingen nach Hause, sie wollten nicht mehr Krieg spielen, sie mochten den Zaren nicht. Und die italienische Armee war zusammengebrochen.

Auf deutschem Boden sei kein einziger Schuss abgefeuert worden. Kein einziger feindlicher Soldat hatte die Grenze nach Deutschland überschritten. Und doch bot Deutschland England Friedensbedingungen an. Sie boten England einen ausgehandelten Frieden auf der Grundlage dessen an, was die Juristen als Status quo ante bezeichnen. Das bedeutet: „Lasst uns den Krieg beenden und alles so lassen, wie es war, bevor der Krieg begann.“ England dachte im Sommer 1916 ernsthaft darüber nach. Sie hatten keine Wahl. Entweder akzeptierte Deutschland diesen ausgehandelten Frieden, den Deutschland ihnen großzügig anbot, oder es führte den Krieg fort und erlitt eine völlige Niederlage.

Währenddessen gingen die Zionisten in Deutschland, die die Zionisten aus Osteuropa vertraten, zum britischen Kriegskabinett und – ich werde mich kurz fassen, weil es eine lange Geschichte ist, aber ich habe alle Dokumente, um jede Aussage zu beweisen die ich mache – sie sagten: „Schau her. Du kannst diesen Krieg noch gewinnen. Du musst nicht aufgeben. Du musst den ausgehandelten Frieden, den dir Deutschland jetzt anbietet, nicht akzeptieren. Du kannst diesen Krieg gewinnen.“ wenn die Vereinigten Staaten als Ihr Verbündeter auftreten.“ Die Vereinigten Staaten befanden sich zu diesem Zeitpunkt nicht im Krieg. Wir waren frisch; wir waren jung; wir waren reich; wir waren mächtig. Sie sagten zu England: „Wir werden garantieren, dass wir die Vereinigten Staaten als Ihren Verbündeten in den Krieg ziehen und mit Ihnen auf Ihrer Seite kämpfen, wenn Sie uns Palästina versprechen, nachdem Sie den Krieg gewonnen haben.“ Mit anderen Worten, sie machten diesen Deal: „Wir werden die Vereinigten Staaten als Ihren Verbündeten in diesen Krieg ziehen. Der Preis, den Sie zahlen müssen, ist Palästina, nachdem Sie den Krieg gewonnen und Deutschland, Österreich-Ungarn und die Türkei besiegt haben.“ Jetzt hatte England das gleiche Recht, jedem Palästina zu versprechen, wie die Vereinigten Staaten Irland aus irgendeinem Grund Japan versprechen müssten. Es ist absolut absurd, dass Großbritannien, das nie eine Verbindung oder ein Interesse oder ein Recht auf das sogenannte Palästina hatte, es als Reichsmünze anbieten sollte, um die Zionisten dafür zu bezahlen, dass sie die Vereinigten Staaten in den Krieg gebracht haben. Allerdings gaben sie dieses Versprechen im Oktober 1916. Und kurz darauf – ich weiß nicht, wie viele sich hier daran erinnern – traten die Vereinigten Staaten, die fast ausschließlich deutschfreundlich eingestellt waren, als Verbündete Großbritanniens in den Krieg ein.

Ich sage, dass die Vereinigten Staaten fast völlig pro-deutsch waren, weil die Zeitungen hier von Juden kontrolliert wurden, die Bankiers Juden waren, alle Massenkommunikationsmedien in diesem Land von Juden kontrolliert wurden; und sie, die Juden, waren pro-deutsch. Sie waren pro-deutsch, weil viele von ihnen aus Deutschland kamen, und sie wollten auch, dass Deutschland den Zaren leckt. Die Juden mochten den Zaren nicht und wollten nicht, dass Russland diesen Krieg gewinnt. Diese deutsch-jüdischen Bankiers wie Kuhn Loeb und die anderen großen Bankhäuser in den Vereinigten Staaten weigerten sich, Frankreich oder England im Umfang eines Dollars zu finanzieren. Sie traten beiseite und sagten: „Solange Frankreich und England an Russland gebunden sind, keinen Cent!“ Aber sie pumpten Geld nach Deutschland, sie kämpften an der Seite Deutschlands gegen Russland und versuchten, das zaristische Regime zu schwächen.

Als nun dieselben Juden die Möglichkeit sahen, Palästina zu bekommen, gingen sie nach England und machten diesen Deal. Damals änderte sich alles, wie eine Ampel, die von Rot auf Grün wechselt. Wo die Zeitungen alle pro-deutsch gewesen waren und dem Volk von den Schwierigkeiten erzählt hatten, die Deutschland im kommerziellen und anderen Kampf gegen Großbritannien hatte, waren die Deutschen plötzlich nicht mehr gut. Sie waren Bösewichte. Sie waren Hunnen. Sie erschossen Krankenschwestern des Roten Kreuzes. Sie schnitten Babys die Hände ab. Sie waren nicht gut. Kurz darauf erklärte Herr Wilson Deutschland den Krieg.

WOODROW WILSON IST DER SELBE SCHEISSE, DER DEN JÜDISCHEN ROTHSCHILD-BANKERS ERLAUBT HAT, DIE USA ZU REGIEREN, INDEM SIE DIE „FEDERAL RESERVE“-BANK FALSCH ERSTELLTEN, UM IHR GELD ZU DRUCKEN!


Die Zionisten in London hatten Telegramme in die Vereinigten Staaten geschickt, an Richter Brandeis, in denen es hieß: „Gehen Sie an die Arbeit für Präsident Wilson. Wir bekommen von England, was wir wollen. Jetzt gehen Sie an die Arbeit für Präsident Wilson und bringen Sie die Vereinigten Staaten in die Sache.“ Krieg." So sind die Vereinigten Staaten in den Krieg geraten. Wir hatten kein Interesse mehr daran; Wir hatten genauso wenig das Recht, darin zu sein, wie wir heute Nacht auf dem Mond sein müssen, anstatt in diesem Raum. Es gab absolut keinen Grund dafür, dass der Erste Weltkrieg unser Krieg sein sollte. Wir wurden in diesen Krieg hineingezogen – wenn ich vulgär sein darf, wurden wir hineingezogen –, nur damit die Zionisten der Welt Palästina erhalten konnten. Das ist etwas, was den Menschen in den Vereinigten Staaten nie gesagt wurde. Sie wussten nie, warum wir in den Ersten Weltkrieg eintraten.

Nachdem wir in den Krieg eingetreten waren, gingen die Zionisten nach Großbritannien und sagten: „Nun, wir haben unseren Teil der Vereinbarung erfüllt. Lassen Sie uns etwas schriftlich festhalten, das zeigt, dass Sie Ihre Abmachung einhalten und uns Palästina geben werden, nachdem Sie gewonnen haben.“ der Krieg." Sie wussten nicht, ob der Krieg noch ein Jahr oder weitere zehn Jahre dauern würde. Also fingen sie an, eine Quittung auszuarbeiten. Die Quittung bestand aus einem Brief, der in sehr kryptischer Sprache verfasst war, damit die Welt nicht wusste, worum es ging. Und das wurde die Balfour-Erklärung genannt.

Die Balfour-Erklärung war lediglich das Versprechen Großbritanniens, den Zionisten das zu zahlen, was sie als Gegenleistung für den Eintritt der Vereinigten Staaten in den Krieg vereinbart hatten. Diese großartige Balfour-Erklärung, von der Sie so viel hören, ist also genauso falsch wie ein Drei-Dollar-Schein. Ich glaube nicht, dass ich es eindringlicher formulieren könnte.
 
Damit begann der ganze Ärger. Die Vereinigten Staaten sind in den Krieg eingestiegen. Die Vereinigten Staaten haben Deutschland vernichtet. Du weißt, was passiert ist. Als der Krieg endete und die Deutschen 1919 zur Pariser Friedenskonferenz nach Paris reisten, waren dort 117 Juden, eine Delegation, die die Juden vertrat, unter der Leitung von Bernard Baruch. Ich war dort: Ich sollte es wissen.
 
Was ist nun passiert? Die Juden sagten auf dieser Friedenskonferenz, als sie Deutschland zerstückelten und Europa an alle diese Nationen aufteilten, die ein Recht auf einen bestimmten Teil des europäischen Territoriums beanspruchten: „Wie wäre es mit Palästina für uns?“ Und sie haben zum ersten Mal nach Kenntnis der Deutschen diese Balfour-Erklärung vorgelegt. So erkannten die Deutschen zum ersten Mal: „Oh, das war das Spiel! Deshalb sind die Vereinigten Staaten in den Krieg eingetreten.“ Die Deutschen erkannten zum ersten Mal, dass sie besiegt waren, sie erlitten die gewaltigen Wiedergutmachungen, die ihnen aufgebrummt wurden, weil die Zionisten Palästina wollten und entschlossen waren, es um jeden Preis zu bekommen.
 
Das bringt uns zu einem weiteren sehr interessanten Punkt. Als die Deutschen das erkannten, ärgerten sie sich natürlich darüber. Bis zu diesem Zeitpunkt ging es den Juden in keinem Land der Welt besser als in Deutschland. Sie hatten Herrn Rathenau dort, der in der Industrie und im Finanzwesen vielleicht hundertmal so wichtig war wie Bernard Baruch in diesem Land. Sie hatten Herrn Balin, dem die beiden großen Dampfschifflinien, der Norddeutsche Lloyd und die Hamburg-Amerikanische Linie, gehörten. Sie hatten Herrn Bleichröder, den Bankier der Familie Hohenzollern. Es gab die Warburgs in Hamburg, die großen Handelsbankiers – die größten der Welt. Den Juden ging es in Deutschland sehr gut. Keine Frage. Die Deutschen meinten: „Na ja, das war ein ziemlicher Ausverkauf.“
 
Es war ein Ausverkauf, der mit dieser hypothetischen Situation verglichen werden könnte: Angenommen, die Vereinigten Staaten befänden sich im Krieg mit der Sowjetunion. Und wir haben gewonnen. Und wir sagten der Sowjetunion: „Nun, lasst uns aufhören. Wir bieten euch Friedensbedingungen. Vergessen wir die ganze Sache.“ Und plötzlich trat Rotchina als Verbündeter der Sowjetunion in den Krieg ein. Und sie in den Krieg zu werfen, führte zu unserer Niederlage. Eine vernichtende Niederlage mit Wiedergutmachungen, die sich die menschliche Vorstellungskraft nicht vorstellen kann. Stellen Sie sich also vor, dass wir nach dieser Niederlage herausfanden, dass es die Chinesen in diesem Land waren, und dass unsere chinesischen Bürger, von denen wir die ganze Zeit geglaubt hatten, dass sie loyale Bürger wären, die mit uns zusammenarbeiten, uns an die Sowjetunion verkauften und dass sie Durch sie wurde Rotchina in den Krieg gegen uns gebracht. Wie würden wir uns dann in den Vereinigten Staaten gegenüber den Chinesen fühlen? Ich glaube nicht, dass einer von ihnen es wagen würde, sein Gesicht auf irgendeiner Straße zu zeigen. Es gäbe nicht genügend praktische Laternenpfähle, um sich um sie zu kümmern. Stellen Sie sich vor, wie wir uns fühlen würden.

Nun, so empfanden die Deutschen diese Juden. Sie waren so nett zu ihnen gewesen: Von 1905 an, als die erste kommunistische Revolution in Russland scheiterte und die Juden aus Russland fliehen mussten, gingen sie alle nach Deutschland. Und Deutschland gewährte ihnen Zuflucht. Und sie wurden sehr nett behandelt. Und hier hatten sie Deutschland aus keinem anderen Grund verkauft als der Tatsache, dass sie Palästina als sogenanntes „jüdisches Gemeinwesen“ haben wollten.

Nun schrieben Nahum Sokolow und alle großen Führer und großen Namen, von denen Sie heute im Zusammenhang mit dem Zionismus lesen, in den Jahren 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922 und 1923 in all ihren Zeitungen – und die Presse war voll von ihren Erklärungen – dass die Gefühle gegen die Juden in Deutschland darauf zurückzuführen sind, dass sie erkannten, dass diese große Niederlage durch jüdische Fürsprache herbeigeführt wurde, indem sie die Vereinigten Staaten in den Krieg brachten. Das gaben die Juden selbst zu. Es war nicht so, dass die Deutschen 1919 herausfanden, dass ein Glas Judenblut besser schmeckte als Coca-Cola oder Münschner-Bier. Es gab kein religiöses Gefühl. Es gab keine Ressentiments gegen diese Menschen allein aufgrund ihres religiösen Glaubens. Es war alles politisch. Es war wirtschaftlich. Es war alles andere als religiös. In Deutschland kümmerte es niemanden, ob ein Jude nach Hause ging, die Jalousien herunterzog und „Shema 'Yisroel“ oder „Vater unser“ sagte. Niemand kümmerte sich in Deutschland mehr darum als in den Vereinigten Staaten. Nun war dieses Gefühl, das sich später in Deutschland entwickelte, auf eines zurückzuführen: Die Deutschen machten die Juden für ihre vernichtende Niederlage verantwortlich.

Und der Erste Weltkrieg war gegen Deutschland begonnen worden, ohne dass Deutschland dafür verantwortlich gewesen wäre. Sie hatten sich nichts schuldig gemacht. Nur darum, erfolgreich zu sein. Sie bauten eine große Marine auf. Sie bauten den Welthandel auf. Sie müssen bedenken, dass Deutschland zur Zeit der Französischen Revolution aus 300 kleinen Stadtstaaten, Fürstentümern, Herzogtümern usw. bestand. Dreihundert einzelne kleine politische Einheiten. Und zwischen dieser Zeit, zwischen der Zeit Napoleons und Bismarcks, wurden sie zu einem Staat zusammengefasst. Und innerhalb von 50 Jahren wurden sie zu einer der Großmächte der Welt. Ihre Marine konkurrierte mit der Großbritanniens, sie machten Geschäfte auf der ganzen Welt, sie konnten jeden unterbieten, sie konnten bessere Produkte herstellen. Was ist dadurch passiert?

Es gab eine Verschwörung zwischen England, Frankreich und Russland, um Deutschland niederzuschlagen. Es gibt keinen einzigen Historiker auf der Welt, der einen triftigen Grund dafür finden kann, warum diese drei Länder beschlossen haben, Deutschland politisch von der Landkarte zu tilgen.

Als Deutschland erkannte, dass die Juden für seine Niederlage verantwortlich waren, empörten sie sich natürlich darüber. Aber keinem Juden kam ein Haar zu Schaden. Kein einziges Haar. Professor Tansill von der Georgetown University, der Zugang zu allen Geheimpapieren des Außenministeriums hatte, schrieb in seinem Buch und zitierte aus einem Dokument des Außenministeriums von Hugo Schoenfelt, einem Juden, den Cordell Hull 1933 nach Europa schickte, um das zu untersuchen sogenannten Lager für politische Gefangene, der zurück schrieb, dass er sie in sehr gutem Zustand vorfand. Sie waren in ausgezeichneter Verfassung und alle wurden gut behandelt. Und sie waren voller Kommunisten. Nun, viele von ihnen waren Juden, denn die Juden stellten damals etwa 98 Prozent der Kommunisten in Europa. Und es waren dort einige Priester und Pfarrer und Arbeiterführer und Freimaurer und andere, die internationale Verbindungen hatten.

Einige Hintergrundinformationen sind angebracht: In den Jahren 1918-1919 übernahmen die Kommunisten für einige Tage Bayern. Rosa Luxemburg und Karl Liebknecht übernahmen zusammen mit einer Gruppe anderer Juden für drei Tage die Regierung. Als der Kaiser den Krieg beendete, floh er tatsächlich nach Holland, weil er glaubte, dass die Kommunisten Deutschland wie Russland übernehmen würden und dass ihm das gleiche Schicksal widerfahren würde wie dem Zaren. Also floh er nach Holland, um Sicherheit zu suchen. Nachdem die kommunistische Bedrohung in Deutschland gebannt war, arbeiteten die Juden immer noch und versuchten, wieder in ihren früheren Status zurückzukehren, und die Deutschen bekämpften sie auf jede erdenkliche Weise, ohne irgendjemandem auch nur ein Haar zu krümmen. Sie bekämpften sie auf die gleiche Weise, wie in diesem Land die Prohibitionisten jeden bekämpften, der sich für Alkohol interessierte. Sie kämpften nicht mit Pistolen gegeneinander. Nun, das ist die Art und Weise, wie sie die Juden in Deutschland bekämpften. Und damals gab es wohlgemerkt 80 bis 90 Millionen Deutsche und nur 460.000 Juden. Etwa ein halbes Prozent der Bevölkerung Deutschlands waren Juden. Und doch kontrollierten sie die gesamte Presse und den größten Teil der Wirtschaft, weil sie bei der Abwertung der Mark mit billigem Geld hereingekommen waren und praktisch alles aufgekauft hatten.

Die Juden versuchten, diese Tatsache zu verheimlichen. Sie wollten nicht, dass die Welt wirklich versteht, dass sie Deutschland ausverkauft hatten und dass die Deutschen das verübelten.

Die Deutschen gingen entsprechend gegen die Juden vor. Sie haben sie, soll ich sagen, diskriminiert, wo immer sie konnten. Sie haben sie gemieden. Genauso würden wir die Chinesen oder die Neger oder die Katholiken oder jeden in diesem Land meiden, der uns an einen Feind verkauft und unsere Niederlage herbeigeführt hat.

Nach einer Weile beriefen die Juden der Welt ein Treffen in Amsterdam ein. Juden aus allen Ländern der Welt nahmen an diesem Treffen im Juli 1933 teil. Und sie sagten zu Deutschland: „Ihr feuert Hitler ab und bringt jeden Juden wieder in seine frühere Position zurück, ob er Kommunist war oder was auch immer er war. Das können Sie.“ Behandle uns nicht so. Und wir, die Juden der Welt, stellen dir ein Ultimatum.“ Sie können sich vorstellen, was die Deutschen ihnen erzählt haben. Was also taten die Juden?

Als Deutschland sich 1933 weigerte, sich der Weltkonferenz der Juden in Amsterdam zu ergeben, löste sich die Konferenz auf und Herr Samuel Untermyer, der Leiter der amerikanischen Delegation und Präsident der gesamten Konferenz, kam in die Vereinigten Staaten und ging vom Dampfer in die Studios des Columbia Broadcasting Systems und sendete eine Radiosendung durch die Vereinigten Staaten, in der er tatsächlich sagte: „Die Juden der Welt erklären jetzt einen Heiligen Krieg gegen Deutschland. Wir befinden uns jetzt in einem heiligen Konflikt.“ gegen die Deutschen. Und wir werden sie aushungern, bis sie kapitulieren. Wir werden einen weltweiten Boykott gegen sie verüben. Das wird sie zerstören, weil sie von ihrem Exportgeschäft abhängig sind.“

Und es ist eine Tatsache, dass zwei Drittel der deutschen Lebensmittelversorgung importiert werden mussten und diese nur mit den Erlösen der Exporte importiert werden konnten. Wenn Deutschland also nicht exportieren könnte, müssten zwei Drittel der deutschen Bevölkerung verhungern. Es gab einfach nicht genug Nahrung für mehr als ein Drittel der Bevölkerung. In dieser Erklärung, die ich hier habe und die am 7. August 1933 in der New York Times abgedruckt wurde, erklärte Herr Samuel Untermyer mutig: „Dieser Wirtschaftsboykott ist unser Mittel zur Selbstverteidigung. Präsident Roosevelt hat seinen Einsatz befürwortet.“ in der National Recovery Administration“, an die sich einige von Ihnen vielleicht erinnern, wo jeder boykottiert werden sollte, es sei denn, er befolgte die Regeln des New Deal, und das wurde vom damaligen Obersten Gerichtshof für verfassungswidrig erklärt. Dennoch erklärten die Juden der Welt einen Boykott gegen Deutschland, und dieser war so effektiv, dass man in keinem Geschäft auf der Welt etwas finden konnte, auf dem „Made in Germany“ stand. Tatsächlich erzählte mir ein leitender Angestellter der Woolworth Company, dass sie Geschirr und Geschirr im Wert von mehreren Millionen Dollar in den Fluss werfen mussten; dass ihre Geschäfte boykottiert wurden, wenn jemand hereinkam und ein Gericht mit der Aufschrift „Made in Germany“ fand, sie wurden mit Schildern mit der Aufschrift „Hitler“, „Mörder“ usw. demonstriert, so etwas wie diese Sitzstreiks, die dort stattfinden Süd.

In einem Laden der Kette R. H. Macy, die von einer ebenfalls jüdischen Familie namens Strauss geführt wurde, fand eine Frau dort Strümpfe aus Chemnitz mit der Aufschrift „Made in Germany“. Nun ja, es waren Baumwollstrümpfe, und vielleicht gibt es sie schon seit 20 Jahren, da ich die Beine von Frauen schon seit vielen Jahren beobachte und es schon lange her ist, dass ich Baumwollstrümpfe an ihnen gesehen habe. Ich sah, wie Macy's boykottiert wurde, wie Hunderte von Menschen mit Schildern mit der Aufschrift „Mörder“, „Hitler“ usw. herumliefen.

Bis zu diesem Zeitpunkt war in Deutschland noch keinem Juden ein einziges Haar gebrochen worden. Es gab kein Leid, es gab keinen Hunger, es gab keinen Mord, es gab nichts.

Natürlich sagten die Deutschen: „Wer sind diese Leute, die einen Boykott gegen uns verkünden, alle unsere Leute arbeitslos machen und unsere Industrien zum Stillstand bringen? Wer sind sie, die uns das antun?“ Sie ärgerten sich natürlich darüber. Sicherlich haben sie Hakenkreuze auf Geschäfte gemalt, die Juden gehörten. Warum sollte ein Deutscher hineingehen und sein Geld einem Ladenbesitzer geben, der Teil eines Boykotts war, der Deutschland aushungern und dazu zwingen würde, sich den Juden der Welt zu ergeben, die diktieren würden, wer ihr Ministerpräsident oder Kanzler sein sollte? Nun, es war lächerlich.

Der Boykott dauerte noch einige Zeit, aber erst 1938, als ein junger Jude aus Polen die deutsche Botschaft in Paris betrat und einen deutschen Beamten erschoss, begannen die Deutschen, mit den Juden in Deutschland richtig hart umzugehen. Und man hat sie dann dabei erwischt, wie sie Fenster einschlugen, Straßenschlägereien veranstalteten und so weiter.

Nun, ich verwende das Wort „Antisemitismus“ nicht gern, weil es bedeutungslos ist, aber es bedeutet Ihnen trotzdem etwas, also muss ich es verwenden. Der einzige Grund, warum es in Deutschland Gefühle gegen Juden gab, war, dass sie für den Ersten Weltkrieg und diesen weltweiten Boykott verantwortlich waren. Letztendlich waren sie auch für den Zweiten Weltkrieg verantwortlich, denn nachdem die Sache außer Kontrolle geraten war, war es für die Juden und Deutschland absolut notwendig, sich einen Krieg zu liefern, um zu sehen, wer überleben würde. In der Zwischenzeit hatte ich in Deutschland gelebt und wusste, dass die Deutschen beschlossen hatten, dass Europa christlich oder kommunistisch sein würde: Es gibt kein Dazwischen. Und die Deutschen entschieden, dass sie es möglichst christlich halten würden. Und sie begannen mit der Neubewaffnung. Im November 1933 erkannten die Vereinigten Staaten die Sowjetunion an. Die Sowjetunion wurde immer mächtiger und Deutschland erkannte, dass „wir bald an der Reihe sein würden, wenn wir nicht stark sind.“ Das Gleiche, was wir in diesem Land heute sagen: „Wir werden bald an der Reihe sein, es sei denn, wir sind stark.“ Unsere Regierung gibt 83 bis 84 Milliarden Dollar für die Verteidigung aus. Verteidigung gegen wen? Verteidigung gegen 40.000 kleine Juden in Moskau, die Russland übernahmen und dann auf ihre hinterlistige Art und Weise die Kontrolle über viele andere Länder der Welt übernahmen.

Dass dieses Land jetzt am Rande eines Dritten Weltkriegs steht, aus dem wir nicht als Sieger hervorgehen können, übersteigt meine Vorstellungskraft. Ich weiß, dass Atombomben in Megatonnen gemessen werden. Eine Megatonne ist eine Bezeichnung für eine Million Tonnen TNT. Unsere Atombomben hatten bei ihrer Entwicklung eine Kapazität von 10 Megatonnen oder 10 Millionen Tonnen TNT. Jetzt haben die Atombomben, die entwickelt werden, eine Kapazität von 200 Megatonnen, und Gott weiß, wie viele Megatonnen die Atombomben der Sowjetunion haben.

Was erwartet uns jetzt? Wenn wir einen Weltkrieg auslösen, der sich zu einem Atomkrieg entwickeln könnte, ist die Menschheit am Ende. Warum könnte ein solcher Krieg stattfinden? Es wird stattfinden, während sich der Vorhang für Akt 3 hebt: Akt 1 war der Erste Weltkrieg, Akt 2 war der Zweite Weltkrieg, Akt 3 wird der Dritte Weltkrieg sein. Die Juden der Welt, die Zionisten und ihre Glaubensbrüder überall sind entschlossen, die Vereinigten Staaten erneut zu nutzen, um Palästina dauerhaft als Stützpunkt ihrer Weltregierung zu behalten. Das ist genauso wahr, wie ich hier stehe. Nicht nur ich habe es gelesen, sondern viele hier haben es auch gelesen, und es ist auf der ganzen Welt bekannt.

Was werden wir machen? Das Leben, das Sie retten, könnte das Ihres Sohnes sein. Vielleicht sind Ihre Jungs heute Abend auf dem Weg in diesen Krieg; Und Sie wissen es genauso wenig wie Sie wussten, dass die Zionisten 1916 in London einen Deal mit dem britischen Kriegskabinett abgeschlossen haben, um Ihre Söhne in den Krieg in Europa zu schicken. Wussten Sie es damals? Kein Mensch in den Vereinigten Staaten wusste es. Du durftest es nicht wissen. Wer wusste es? Präsident Wilson wusste es. Colonel House wusste es. Andere Insider wussten es.

Wusste ich es? Ich hatte eine ziemlich gute Vorstellung davon, was vor sich ging: Ich war Verbindungsmann zu Henry Morgenthau Sr. im Wahlkampf 1912, als Präsident Wilson gewählt wurde, und im dortigen Büro gab es Gespräche. Ich war der „vertrauliche Mann“ von Henry Morgenthau sen., dem Vorsitzenden des Finanzausschusses, und ich war der Verbindungsmann zwischen ihm und Rollo Wells, dem Schatzmeister. Also saß ich bei diesen Treffen mit Präsident Wilson am Kopfende des Tisches und all den anderen, und ich hörte, wie sie Präsident Wilson die abgestufte Einkommenssteuer und das, was zur Federal Reserve geworden ist, ins Gehirn trommelten, und ich hörte, wie sie ihn damit indoktrinierten Zionistische Bewegung.

Richter Brandeis und Präsident Wilson standen sich genauso nahe wie die beiden Finger dieser Hand. Präsident Woodrow Wilson war ebenso inkompetent, wenn es darum ging, festzustellen, was als Neugeborenes vor sich ging. So brachten sie uns in den Ersten Weltkrieg, während wir alle schliefen. Sie schickten unsere Jungen dorthin, um sie abzuschlachten. Wofür? So können die Juden Palästina als ihr „Commonwealth“ haben. Sie haben dich so sehr getäuscht, dass du nicht weißt, ob du kommst oder gehst.

Nun sagt jeder Richter, wenn er eine Jury anklagt: „Meine Herren, jeder Zeuge, von dem Sie finden, dass er auch nur eine einzige Lüge erzählt hat, Sie können seine gesamte Aussage außer Acht lassen.“ Ich weiß nicht, aus welchem Bundesstaat Sie kommen, aber im Bundesstaat New York spricht ein Richter so zu einer Jury. Wenn dieser Zeuge gelogen hat, ignorieren Sie seine Aussage.

Was sind die Fakten über die Juden?

Wissen Sie, was Juden am Versöhnungstag tun, der ihnen Ihrer Meinung nach so heilig ist? Ich war einer von ihnen. Das ist kein Hörensagen. Ich bin nicht hier, um ein Hetzer zu sein. Ich bin hier, um Ihnen Fakten zu liefern. Wenn Sie am Versöhnungstag eine Synagoge betreten, stehen Sie schon beim ersten Gebet auf, das Sie sprechen. Es ist das einzige Gebet, für das Sie stehen. Sie wiederholen dreimal ein kurzes Gebet namens Kol Nidre.

In diesem Gebet gehen Sie eine Vereinbarung mit Gott, dem Allmächtigen, ein, dass jeder Eid, Gelübde oder Versprechen, das Sie in den nächsten zwölf Monaten leisten, null und nichtig ist. Der Eid soll kein Eid sein; das Gelübde soll kein Gelübde sein; das Pfand soll kein Pfand sein. Sie haben keine Kraft oder Wirkung. Darüber hinaus lehrt der Talmud, dass Sie bei jedem Eid, Gelübde oder Versprechen an das Kol Nidre-Gebet denken müssen, das Sie am Versöhnungstag gesprochen haben, und von der Erfüllung dieser Gebete befreit sind.

Wie sehr können Sie sich auf ihre Loyalität verlassen? Auf ihre Loyalität können Sie sich ebenso verlassen wie die Deutschen im Jahr 1916. Wir werden das gleiche Schicksal erleiden wie Deutschland, und aus dem gleichen Grund. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_H._Freedman

A Jewish Defector Warns America

THEY WON'T LET THIS ONE STAY UP FOR LONG, SO DL IT WHILE YOU CAN!

What do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished. 

Why might such a war take place? It will take place as the curtain goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World War I, Act 2 was World War II, Act 3 is going to be World War III. The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government. That is just as true as I am standing here. Not alone have I read it, but many here have also read it, and it is known all over the world.

 A Jewish Defector Warns America

 Introductory Note

 Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals of the 20th century. Born in 1890, he was a successful Jewish businessman of New York City at one time principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United States.

Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over our nation. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times.

This speech was given before a patriotic audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel, Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley's patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense. Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and extemporaneous speech has become dated, Mr. Freedman's essential message to us -- his warning to the West -- is more urgent than ever before. -- K.A.S.

Benjamin Freedman Speaks:

Here in the United States, the Zionists and their co-religionists have complete control of our government. 

For many reasons, too many and too complex to go into here at this time, the Zionists and their co-religionists rule these United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country. Now you may say that is a very broad statement, but let me show you what happened while we were all asleep.

What happened? World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. There are few people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.

Within two years Germany had won that war: not only won it nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean. 

Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, with one week's food supply -- and after that, starvation. At that time, the French army had mutinied. They had lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was defecting, they were picking up their toys and going home, they didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed.

Not a shot had been fired on German soil. Not one enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. 

And yet, Germany was offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: "Let's call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started." England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that -- seriously. They had no choice. 

It was either accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and being totally defeated. 

While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and -- I am going to be brief because it's a long story, but I have all the documents to prove any statement that I make -- they said: "Look here. You can yet win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally." The United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were powerful. They told England: "We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war." In other words, they made this deal: "We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey." Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It's absolutely absurd that Great Britain, that never had any connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the United States into the war. However, they did make that promise, in October of 1916. And shortly after that -- I don't know how many here remember it -- the United States, which was almost totally pro-German, entered the war as Britain's ally.

I say that the United States was almost totally pro-German because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews; and they, the Jews, were pro-German. They were pro-German because many of them had come from Germany, and also they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar. The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they didn't want Russia to win this war. These German-Jew bankers, like Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: 

"As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!" But they poured money into Germany, they fought beside Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist regime.

Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine, went to England and they made this deal. At that time, everything changed, like a traffic light that changes from red to green. Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they'd been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies' hands. They were no good. Shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany.

WOODROW WILSON IS THE VERY SAME SHIT WHO ALLOWED THE BANKSTERS TO RULE THE USA BY MISCREATING THE FED!

;-(




The Zionists in London had sent cables to the United States, to Justice Brandeis, saying "Go to work on President Wilson. We're getting from England what we want. Now you go to work on President Wilson and get the United States into the war." That's how the United States got into the war. We had no more interest in it; we had no more right to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this room. 

There was absolutely no reason for World War I to be our war. We were railroaded into -- if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into -- that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. That is something that the people of the United States have never been told. They never knew why we went into World War I.

After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: "Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war." They didn't know whether the war would last another year or another ten years. So they started to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter, which was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn't know what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration.



The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. I don't think I could make it more emphatic than that.

That is where all the trouble started. The United States got in the war. The United States crushed Germany. You know what happened. When the war ended, and the Germans went to Paris for the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought to know.

Now what happened? The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations who claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, said, "How about Palestine for us?" And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time realized, "Oh, so that was the game! That's why the United States came into the war." The Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered the terrific reparations that were slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and were determined to get it at any cost. 

That brings us to another very interesting point. When the Germans realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never been better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany. You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times as important in industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this country. You had Mr. Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the North German Lloyd's and the Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family. You had the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers -- the biggest in the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No question about that. The Germans felt: "Well, that was quite a sellout."

It was a sellout that might be compared to this hypothetical situation: Suppose the United States was at war with the Soviet Union. And we were winning. And we told the Soviet Union: "Well, let's quit. We offer you peace terms. Let's forget the whole thing." And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union. And throwing them into the war brought about our defeat. A crushing defeat, with reparations the likes of which man's imagination cannot encompass. Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we had thought were loyal citizens working with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union and that it was through them that Red China was brought into the war against us. How would we feel, then, in the United States against Chinese? I don't think that one of them would dare show his face on any street. There wouldn't be enough convenient lampposts to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel.

Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. They'd been so nice to them: from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here they had sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than the fact that they wanted Palestine as a so-called "Jewish commonwealth."

Now Nahum Sokolow, and all the great leaders and great names that you read about in connection with Zionism today, in 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922, and 1923 wrote in all their papers -- and the press was filled with their statements -- that the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was brought about by Jewish intercession in bringing the United States into the war. The Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn't that the Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer. There was no religious feeling. There was no sentiment against those people merely on account of their religious belief. It was all political. It was economic. It was anything but religious. Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shades and said "Shema 'Yisroel" or "Our Father." Nobody cared in Germany any more than they do in the United States. Now this feeling that developed later in Germany was due to one thing: the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat.

And World War I had been started against Germany for no reason for which Germany was responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of being successful. They built up a big navy. They built up world trade. You must remember that Germany at the time of the French Revolution consisted of 300 small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth. Three hundred separate little political entities. And between that time, between the times of Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one state. And within 50 years they became one of the world's great powers. Their navy was rivaling Great Britain's, they were doing business all over the world, they could undersell anybody, they could make better products. What happened as a result of that?

There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia to slap down Germany. There isn't one historian in the world who can find a valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off the map politically.

When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State Department, wrote in his book, and quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew whom Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political prisoners, who wrote back that he found them in very fine condition. They were in excellent shape, with everybody treated well. And they were filled with Communists. 

Well, a lot of them were Jews, because the Jews happened to comprise about 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that time. And there were some priests there, and ministers, and labor leaders, and Masons, and others who had international affiliations.

Some background is in order: In 1918-1919 the Communists took over Bavaria for a few days. Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht and a group of other Jews took over the government for three days. In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war he fled to Holland because he thought the Communists were going to take over Germany as they did Russia and that he was going to meet the same fate as the Czar. So he fled to Holland for safety, for security. After the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, the Jews were still working, trying to get back into their former status, and the Germans fought them in every way they could without hurting a single hair on anyone's head. They fought them the same way that, in this country, the Prohibitionists fought anyone who was interested in liquor. They didn't fight one another with pistols. 

Well, that's the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans, and there were only 460,000 Jews. About one half of one per cent of the population of Germany were Jews. And yet they controlled all the press, and they controlled most of the economy because they had come in with cheap money when the mark was devalued and bought up practically everything.

The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact. They didn't want the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the Germans resented that.

The Germans took appropriate action against the Jews. They, shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could. They shunned them. The same way that we would shun the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat.

After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews from every country in the world attended this meeting in July 1933. And they said to Germany: "You fire Hitler, and you put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist or no matter what he was. You can't treat us that way. 

And we, the Jews of the world, are serving an ultimatum upon you." You can imagine what the Germans told them. So what did the Jews do?

In 1933, when Germany refused to surrender to the world conference of Jews in Amsterdam, the conference broke up, and Mr. Samuel Untermyer, who was the head of the American delegation and the president of the whole conference, came to the United States and went from the steamer to the studios of the Columbia Broadcasting System and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he in effect said, "The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them. That will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business."

 And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany's population would have to starve. There was just not enough food for more than one third of the population. Now in this declaration, which I have here, and which was printed in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer boldly stated that "this economic boycott is our means of self-defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the National Recovery Administration," which some of you may remember, where everybody was to be boycotted unless he followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, and which was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of that time. Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you couldn't find one thing in any store anywhere in the world with the words "Made in Germany" on it. In fact, an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted if anyone came in and found a dish marked "made in Germany," they were picketed with signs saying "Hitler," "murderer," and so forth, something like these sit-ins that are taking place in the South.

At a store belonging to the R. H. Macy chain, which was controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews, a woman found stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked "Made in Germany." Well, they were cotton stockings and they may have been there 20 years, since I've been observing women's legs for many years and it's been a long time since I've seen any cotton stockings on them. I saw Macy's boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with signs saying "murderers," "Hitlerites," and so forth.

Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in Germany. There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no murder, there was nothing.

Naturally, the Germans said, "Who are these people to declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and make our industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us?" They naturally resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews. Why should a German go in and give his money to a storekeeper who was part of a boycott that was going to starve Germany into surrendering to the Jews of the world, who were going to dictate who their premier or chancellor was to be? Well, it was ridiculous.

The boycott continued for some time, but it wasn't until 1938, when a young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot a German official, that the Germans really started to get rough with the Jews in Germany. And you found them then breaking windows and having street fights and so forth.

Now I don't like to use the word "anti-Semitism" because it's meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I'll have to use it. The only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews was that they were responsible for World War I and for this world-wide boycott. Ultimately they were also responsible for World War II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive. In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had decided that Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there is no in between. And the Germans decided they were going to keep it Christian if possible. And they started to re-arm. In November 1933 the United States recognized the Soviet Union. 

The Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized that "Our turn was going to come soon, unless we are strong." The same as we in this country are saying today, "Our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong." Our government is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars for defense. Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000 little Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their devious ways, took over control of many other countries of the world.

For this country now to be on the verge of a Third World War, from which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of megatons. A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of TNT. Our nuclear bombs had a capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT, when they were first developed. Now, the nuclear bombs that are being developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.

What do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear war, humanity is finished. 

Why might such a war take place? It will take place as the curtain goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World War I, Act 2 was World War II, Act 3 is going to be World War III. The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government. That is just as true as I am standing here. Not alone have I read it, but many here have also read it, and it is known all over the world.

What are we going to do? The life you save may be your son's. Your boys may be on their way to that war tonight; and you don't know it any more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a deal with the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe. Did you know it at that time? Not a person in the United States knew it. You weren't permitted to know it. Who knew it? President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other insiders knew it.

 Did I know it? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was elected, and there was talk around the office there. I was "confidential man" to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the Finance Committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the treasurer. So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into President Wilson's brain the graduated income tax and what has become the Federal Reserve, and I heard them indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement. 

Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as close as the two fingers on this hand. President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when it came to determining what was going on as a newborn baby. That is how they got us into World War I, while we all slept. They sent our boys over there to be slaughtered. For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as their "commonwealth." They've fooled you so much that you don't know whether you're coming or going.

Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, "Gentlemen, any witness who you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony." I don't know what state you come from, but in New York state that is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness told one lie, disregard his testimony.

What are the facts about the Jews? 

Do you know what Jews do on the Day of Atonement, that you think is so sacred to them? I was one of them. This is not hearsay. I'm not here to be a rabble-rouser. I'm here to give you facts. When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, you stand up for the very first prayer that you recite. It is the only prayer for which you stand. You repeat three times a short prayer called the Kol Nidre.

In that prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months shall be null and void. The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall not be a pledge. They shall have no force or effect. And further, the Talmud teaches that whenever you take an oath, vow, or pledge, you are to remember the Kol Nidre prayer that you recited on the Day of Atonement, and you are exempted from fulfilling them.

How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can depend upon their loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916. We are going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the same reasonhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_H._Freedman

Friday, December 29, 2023

"PRE-EMPTIVELY DEFENSIVE" CENSORSHIP AND BOOK-BURNING CONFISCATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE ISRAELI LOBBY COME TO CANADA!

"PRE-EMPTIVELY DEFENSIVE" CENSORSHIP COMES TO CANADA BY WAY OF AND IN DEFENSE OF ONLY THE FOREIGN NATION OF ISRAEL'S JEWS!

That old trope about how the "Road to Hell is paved with good intentions!" means THIS in real life:

Crime is defined as intentionally attacking thereby innocent others first.

"Crime prevention" is attacking thereby innocent other people first, too.

i.e: "We must arrest you to stop you from committing the crimes you have yet to commit! Only when everyone is safely locked up, will we finally achieve 'peace!' Always trade risky freedom for safe security (aka slavery)! 

(SO: DON'T THINK; JUST OBEY US)!

Whee!"

DITTO FOR ALL 'PRE-EMPTIVELY DEFENSIVE' "HARM PREVENTION" MEASURES: THEY ARE CRIMES!

Since subjectively responsibility-averse libertine "Liberal" criminal leftopaths don't trust them selves to abide by any agreements, they also won't trust anyone else to, either, and so try to impose force by "governing" (defrauding enslaving and destroying) others' lives, to protect only them selves from us.

But in general, no force or police or laws are necessary among free citizens who can (or will) govern themselves, while the opposite is: no amount of force or police or laws are enough for a people who CANNOT (or will not) govern themselves. 

These non-law guidelines for the Canadian Border Security Agents to confiscate books Jews deem "hateful!" from Canadian importers were drafted in 2017 under the compromised and corrupted globalist Trudeau regime.

The Canadian government is inducing its Border Security Agents to commit sedition against we the Canadian people, who are the real owners of this country, in order to forbid us from Noticing and prevent us from telling others about their crimes committed against us on behalf of the foreign Nation of Israel and its Rothschild bankster owners by inflicting their own self-hating anti-goyim Jewish "hate propaganda" on us!

In other words, they are, as all criminals do, accusing us of the very same crimes they commit against us!



Here's an official memo to "their" (our) CBSA enforcement agents, referencing Canada's ANTI-HATE-SPEECH "LAWS:" (And by it's description of verboten topics, it's pretty easy to see (((who))) it was obviously very specifically written to protect the alleged hurt feelings of, too)!

This was drafted to for Canada Customs and Border Security Agency (CBSA) teams to restrict imports of books and thereby deprive citizens of their freedom of thought rights and of free speech. As you can see, they are Hell-bent on trying to make sure nobody is allowed to Notice and complain about how these things are really happening!

From here: https://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/dm-md/d9/d9-1-15-eng.html

"D Memoranda" D9-1-15:

"Guidelines and General Information:

The Uniqueness of Hate Propaganda, Sedition and Treason Decisions in the Canada Border Services Agency’s (CBSA) Mandate

1. In the course of administering the many laws of Parliament that regulate, control or prohibit the importation of goods into Canada, CBSA officials deal with a wide range of goods.

2. Importation of certain categories of goods is prohibited under Customs Tariff item 9899.00.00. One category under tariff item 9899.00.00 involves material that is suspected of constituting hate propaganda, sedition or treason as defined in subsections 46(2), 59(4) and 320(8) of the Criminal Code. The Customs Tariff prohibits the importation of such material into Canada, including written, visual and audio materials.

3. Unlike many other goods routinely dealt with by CBSA officials, expressive materials have been found by the courts to be protected by the freedom of expression guarantee set out in subsection 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Although not specifically tested in the courts to date, it is believed (by whom is not mentioned; presumably only them selves) that, in respect to hate propaganda, sedition and treason, as with obscenity, the infringement of section 2(b) of the Charter is justified under its own section 1, because the overriding objective of the law is the avoidance of harm to society and that is a sufficiently substantial concern to warrant a restriction on freedom of expression."

GET IT? THEY PRETEND TO "BELIEVE" THAT THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND AND ADMITTEDLY EVEN WITHOUT LEGAL JUSTIFICATION, SHOULD BE INFRINGED BY THEM BECAUSE THEIR OWN SUBJECTIVE, LITERALLY AND SPECIFICALLY EMOTIONS-DRIVEN OPINIONS CONCERNING WHAT IS AND IS NOT YOUR "HATE," IS GOOD ENOUGH TO INFRINGE YOUR FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION CHARTER RIGHT IN ORDER TO AVOID SOME SORT OF NEBULOUS "HARM TO SOCIETY!" CLEARLY, THIS ASSERTION IS ITSELF SEDITION, AS IT PRETEND TO JUSTIFY WITHOUT ACT OF PARLIAMENT OR BY EVEN BOTHERING TO HAVE ANY DULY-ELECTED OFFICIALS OF ANY LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT - WHETHER PROVINCIAL OR EVEN MUNICIPAL - TO ATTEMPT TO DULY LEGISLATE, EVEN BY INVOKING THE CONSTITUTION'S OWN "NOTWITHSTANDING" CLAUSE, ANY LAW/S TO JUSTIFY THAT, ONLY BY SPECIFICALLY AND LITERALLY "INFRINGING" THE HIGHEST LAW OF THE LAND, CAN THEY EMPOWER THEM SELVES ALONE TO "AVOID HARM TO SOCIETY" BY RESTRICTING THE CITIZENS' FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION!

GET IT? "ONLY BY INFRINGING THE LAW CAN WE OURSELVES ENFORCE IT!"

THE IMPLICATION HERE IS, THAT BY MERELY BEING EXPOSED TO OTHERS' CALLS TO INCITE VIOLENCE, THE CITIZENS WILL AUTOMATICALLY AND INSTANTLY BECOME MINDLESSLY VIOLENT BECAUSE WE CAN'T BE TRUSTED TO THINK ON OUR OWN, AND OUR ACTIONS ARE ALL DRIVEN BY EMOTIONS!

Naturally, this also means that, as is usual, you and I are being pre-judged guilty of spreading "Hate Propaganda" merely by reading it - even before the National Socialist history book you ordered online has arrived from another country for you to have been able to make up your own mind as to the nature of its contents!



From memo 15:

From here: https://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/dm-md/d9/d9-1-15-eng.html

"Preliminary Examination:

10. During the initial examination of suspect goods, CBSA officials must scan for ... the targeting of an identifiable group (hate propaganda). 

Determining Whether Goods are Hate Propaganda:

Goods that constitute hate propaganda under the Criminal Code are those that contain depictions and/or descriptions that advocate or promote genocide or that publicly incite or willfully promote hatred against an identifiable group, distinguished by colour, race, religion, national or ethnic origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or mental or physical disability.

SO WE ARE TO BE AUTOMATICALLY SLANDERED IN ADVANCE BY BEING PRESUMED GUILTY OF "PROMOTING HATRED" (AN EMOTIONAL EFFECT, NOT AN AUTOMATIC CAUSE OF VIOLENCE) AGAINST ANY GROUP WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO IDENTIFY, BASED ON OUR OWN BRAINS' ABILITY TO DETECT PATTERNS, SUCH AS THAT A CERTAIN RELIGION PROMOTES A CERTAIN RACIAL GROUP OR ETHNICITY AS BEING SO INHERENTLY SUPERIOR TO ALL OTHERS THAT THEY ARE LITERALLY "AS GODS" IN COMPARISON TO THE OTHERS, WHO WERE MERELY CREATED BY THEIR OWN GOD "AS BEASTS" TO SERVE THEM  AS SLAVES IN ALL WAYS, INCLUDING BY THEREBY ALLOWING THEM SELVES TO RAPE US, (INCLUDING OUR CHILDREN) TO ROB AND KILL US AT WILL, AND EVEN EAT US, WITHOUT ANY MORAL OR LEGAL CONSEQUENCES WHAT SO EVER. THE IMPLICATION HERE IS THAT EVERYONE ELSE, OF ALL RACES etc., MUST IGNORE  CONDONE AND EVEN CELEBRATE THESE THREATS AGAINST US, RATHER THAN "ILLEGALLY" FEAR AND "HATE" THEM AS INHERENTLY EXISTENTIAL CRIMINAL THREATS TO GENOCIDE US!

Goods may be prohibited as hate propaganda if they advocate or promote the genocide of an identifiable group. Genocide is defined as acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, an identifiable group, either by killing members of the group or by deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction.

THE JEWS' OWN TALMUD IS THUS ITSELF DEFINED AS "HATE PROPAGANDA" AS BY ENSLAVING ROBBING RAPING KILLING AND EATING OUR CHILDREN, THE JEWS WHO WROTE IT AND ENDORSE IT AS HOLY, INCITE OUR GENOCIDE!

8. Goods that incite or promote hatred against an identifiable group, by incorporating some or all of the following allegations, may be prohibited as hate propaganda:

(a) allegations that an identifiable group is to blame for serious economic or social problems;

(b) allegations that an identifiable group manipulates media, trade, finance, government or world politics to the detriment of society;

(c) allegations that an identifiable group is inferior or superior to another group; and/or

(d) allegations that an identifiable group weakens or threatens society, in whole or in part.

Well, isn't that strangely (and suspiciously) specific!

It's hard to imagine that if someone was a racist prejudiced against Black people in general, their first instinct would be to express that "hate" with the bizarre propaganda notion that, say, the inhabitants or governments of Chad, Sudan, or Nigeria had somehow taken over and were actively engaged in manipulating our media and financial banking system to corrupt our politicians and threaten society LOL!

It's also not the first thing we would think to accuse even another ethnically "White" group, say, the Swedes, of doing, had we some sort of inexplicably prejudicial "hatred" of them and their meatballs!

IT IS ALSO NOTABLE THAT THE JEWS' OWN TALMUD, IN ATTEMPTING TO JUSTIFY THE GENOCIDE OF ALL NON-JEWS, SIMPLY ASSERTS THAT THEIR OWN GOD DELIBERATELY CREATED US TO BE INFERIOR TO THEM, AND DOES NOT IN ANY WAY PRETEND THAT WE THREATEN THEM BY CAUSING THEM ANY SERIOUS ECONOMIC PROBLEMS TO WEAKEN ANY SOCIETIES' TRADE BY DINT OF MANIPULATING FINANCE TO SUBVERT THE WORLD'S GOVERNMENT POLITICS TO THEIR DETRIMENT; IN STEAD, THEIR BIBLE ITSELF OPENLY AND CLEARLY ASSERTS THAT THEIR OWN GOD COMMANDS THEY DO  IT TO US!

So, obviously, this can believably refer to only ONE very specific group - the Israeli Jews, especially the Rothschilds and their Israeli Jewish minions.

Yet also under the "exceptions" part of these their non-laws, the truth is supposedly a defense, and as we all know, the Israeli Jews themselves openly brag about owning the world through their banks, and of owning the global media through the five Jewish corporations which own them all.

Further, not only has the Rothschild Jew scion Klaus Schwab, CEO of their World Economic Forum, openly bragged about how the members of his "Young Global Leaders" school, specifying Justin Trudeau and Jacinda Adern as his exemplars, "penetrated the cabinets of world governments," but the very existence of this Canadian Border Security Agent Memo  itself, as it has been openly and proudly designed to specifically deprive Canadian citizens of their freedom of expression Charter rights, proves the success of his plan!

So these politicians and their Customs and Revenue Agency border guard minions are openly engaged in the very same seditious Jewish anti-goyim "hate propaganda"-based activities they are pretending to prevent! 

And it's being done on behalf of a group  which promotes its self as superior - Divinely Chosen, even - to any and all other groups, and by which we non-Jewish goys are, by their own Talmudic definitions, so inferior as to amount to nothing but beasts of burden in human form, to be enslaved, raped, killed and even eaten at will by them.

"Luckily," (for them) though, this memo also excuses such behavior on its very own religions claims grounds - so, since the Jews have declared "God told us to commit these crimes!" they aren't really crimes at all!

Whee!

"Determining Whether Goods are Seditious:

9. Goods that are of a seditious character are, for example, goods that contain depictions and/or descriptions that advocate the use of force, without the authority of law, as a means of accomplishing governmental change within Canada.

OBVIOUSLY, THE JEWS, BY DIRECTLY INFLUENCING THE CREATION OF SUCH DOCUMENTS AS THESE VERY MEMORANDA, HAVE CREATED "GOODS" WHICH BENEFIT ONLY THEM SELVES, BY DESCRIBING CANADIANS WHO DARE TO NOTICE THESE PATTERNS, AS "HATEFUL!" 

AND WHOSE RIGHTS ARE TO BE DEPRIVED BY THE FORCEFUL CONFISCATION OF THE INFORMATION THEY NEED - BY IN EFFECT DESTROYING AND HIDING THE EVIDENCE OF THEIR CRIMES - COMMIT SEDITION AGAINST CANADIAN CITIZENS BY PERPETUATING THE PERPETRATION OF THEIR ALREADY-ACCOMPLISHED GOVERNMENTAL CHANGE IN CANADA FROM A GOVERNMENT OF AND BY THE CANADIAN PEOPLE TO ONE OF BY AND FOR THE FOREIGN ISRAELI JEWISH BANKSTERS!

"Defences and Exceptions:

11. Goods that may constitute hate propaganda, through their willful promotion of hatred, will not be classified under tariff item 9899.00.00 if the goods are found to:

(a) communicate statements that are established to be true; ("BUT IF NOT YET PROVEN IN A COURT OF LAW TO BE TRUE, WE WILL SEIZE ALL EVIDENCE OF SAME IN ADVANCE AND DESTROY IT, IN ORDER TO PREVENT IT FROM BEING USED TO PROVE THEM TRUE)!"

(b) predominately express, in good faith, an opinion on a religious subject or an opinion based on a belief in a religious text;

i.e: "BUT STILL, IT'S ILLEGAL , AS JEWISH CRIMES AREN'T REALLY CRIMES BECAUSE THEY SAY THEIR OWN G*D TOLD THEM TO COMMIT THEM! WHEE!"

(c) be relevant to any subject of public interest, the discussion of which is for the public benefit and, on reasonable grounds, are believed to be true; or

BUT STILL, THE CBSA'S OWN PROPERTY-SEIZING LEGISLATION INHERENTLY CONTRADICTS ITSELF BY PREVENTING THIS DISCUSSION!

(d) be intended, in good faith, to point out, for the purposes of removal, matters producing or tending to produce feelings of hatred toward an identifiable group in Canada.

BUT THIS SHOULD LOGICALLY BE DETERMINED BY THE SEQUENTIAL PROCESS OF FIRST PART (c)  (AND THEN (a) (ABOVE)! AND AS THEY HEREBY PERMIT THEM SELVES TO INFRINGE OUR HIGHEST CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, IN ORDER TO "PRE-EMPTIVELY DEFEND SOCIETY" FROM THE HARM OF BEING ABLE TO READ THE ALLEGED "HATE PROPAGANDA" BY SEIZING IT BEFORE IT CAN BE READ AND ANALYZED, THE VERY EXISTENCE OF THESE MEMOS DEPRIVES US OF ANY ABILITY TO POINT OUT, FOR PURPOSES OF REMOVING IT FROM ANY DOUBT, AND THUS FOREARMING SOCIETY AGAINST FUTURE MISAPPREHENDED AND UNCHALLENGED BELIEF IN ITS UNJUSTIFIABLY "HATEFUL" NATURE (THE WHOLE IMPLICATION OF THIS MEMO BEING THAT NO KIND OF HATE IS EVER GOOD, EVEN AS THEY HATEFULLY MADE ALL HATE INTO A CRIME TO FORBID US FROM HATING CRIMES AND THE CRIMINALS WHO COMMIT THEM) BY ATTEMPTING TO DESTROY BY DINT OF ITS PHYSICAL REMOVAL, THE VERY EVIDENCE OF ITS OWN ALLEGED HATE!

12. Similarly, goods that may constitute sedition will not be classified under tariff item 9899.00.00 if the goods are found to have only the intention, in good faith to:

(a)  show that Her Majesty has been misled or mistaken in her measures;

(FOR INSTANCE, BY ALLOWING THESE MEMORANDA TO EXIST IN THE FIRST PLACE)!

(b)  point out errors or defects in the government or constitution of Canada or a province, in the Parliament or the legislature or a province, or in the administration of justice in Canada;

SUCH AS HOW THE CABINETS OF BOTH CANADA'S FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS HAVE BEEN INFILTRATED (OR  "PENETRATED") BY WEF-TRAINED "YOUNG GLOBAL LEADER" TRAITORS? OR SIMPLY BY DINT OF SUCH MEMOS AS THESE, WHICH DESTROY EVIDENCE OF ALLEGED HATE-INCITING PROPAGANDA CRIMES BEFORE IT CAN BE READ AND ASSESSED?

(c)  procure, by lawful means, the alteration of any matter of government in Canada; or

(d)  point out, for the purposes or removal, matters that produce or tend to produce feelings of hostility or ill-will between different classes of persons in Canada.

YES, THE JEWS, WHO BY THE VERY EXISTENTIAL DEFINITION OF THEIR OWN RACIAL SUPREMACIST RELIGIOUS CREED ITSELF PROMOTE FEELINGS OF HOSTILITY AND ILL-WILL BETWEEN THEM SELVES AND ALL GOYIM, SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM CANADA, AND NOT THE EVIDENCE OF THEIR "HATEFUL PROPAGANDA!" IN THEIR OWN TANAKHS AND TALMUDS, TO JUSTIFY IT!

Other Considerations:

13. It should be emphasized that every suspect item is to be assessed in its entirety, with full recognition given to freedom of expression."

THAT'S RICH IN UNINTENDED IRONY, ISN'T IT? "FULL RECOGNITION"  OF OUR FREE EXPRESSION RIGHTS (EXCEPT AS PER ABOVE, WHERE THE BORDER GUARDS' OWN SUBJECTIVE OPINIONS DECIDE WHAT IS UNJUSTIFIABLY "HATEFUL" WITHOUT BOTHERING TO HAVE TO TAKE IT BEFORE A JUDGE IN A COURT OF LAW, THUS PRE-JUDGING PEOPLE WHO WANT TO READ IT TO BE ABLE TO ENJOY THEIR OWN RIGHT TO DECIDE FOR THEM SELVES WHAT IS AND IS NOT "HATEFUL!" TO THEM, TO BE IN STEAD DECIDED BY SOME LOWLY THOUGHT-POLICING BORDER GUARDS, FOR "PUBLIC" (JEWISH) "SAFETY!" AS IF BY MERELY READING IT, WE BECOME AUTOMATICALLY GUILTY OF PROPAGATING IT IN PUBLIC AS "HATE PROPAGANDA!"

IN FACT, BY DECLARING THEIR OWN RIGHT TO SPECIFICALLY "INFRINGE" OUR HIGHEST CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, BY DESTROYING EVIDENCE BEFORE IT CAN COME BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT COURTS FOR JUDGMENT, PRESENTS ITSELF AS AN OBVIOUSLY SEDITIOUS ATTEMPT TO UNDERMINE OUR COURTS WHICH HAD THEM SELVES BEEN LEGISLATED INTO EXISTENCE BY OUR OWN GOVERNMENT; SO: BY ACTING ON THESE MEMOS, THEY COMMIT TREASON!

And even if we ignore the emotional nonsense, they are still conflating "hate" propaganda with unlawful incitement to violence, by (again) pre-determining without any proof that one will do so unlawfully - because it is legal to call for and incite in public violence in response to ongoing crimes, for instance by demanding the return of the death penalty for REAL sedition and treason, such as is being perpetrated on Canada's citizens by these very same Jews and their compromised and corrupted "Canadian government" border security agents' own illegal activities here!

FURTHER, IN REGARDS TO SECTION 10: TREASON:

"Determining Whether Goods are Treasonable:

10. Goods that are of a treasonable character are, for example, goods that contain depictions and/or descriptions that advocate the use of force or violence to overthrow the Government of Canada or a province, or which communicate or make available to an agent of a state other than Canada, without lawful authority, any military or scientific information that may be used by the state for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or defence of Canada."

These memoranda them selves serve that purpose, by advocating the guards forcibly deprive Canada's citizens - our real government - of our property and Constitutional right to read documents to make up and express our own minds, in deference to a hostile foreign nation's government; which is by definition prejudicial to our safety/defence!



But don't expect any court of "law" judge to defend your rights - they already all operate on the brazen rule of crime principle, where we are all pre-judged guilty until never proven innocent, just as these memos do. No judge in Canada would see anything wrong with being able to deprive us of our right to think and act for our selves, as the very purpose of "Muh Democratic Politics" itself is to force us to defer our own rightful self-reliant responsibility to think and act for our selves to our re-presentatives!

And so voting is also pointless because by doing it you betray your self - trying to have the right to become irresponsible gives away your right to be self-reliantly responsible to someone else. 

The politicians you hire ('elect') to defer your responsibility to think and act for your self don't initially betray you, because they're only doing the exact same thing you were when you hired them: like you, they are not thinking and acting for you, just as you initially refused to think and act for your self!

But it's still also TREASON, because these professional criminal hypocrite politicians put them selves and their party above the citizens lives! All they're doing is selling our country with delayed sales (bank "loans") to the Jewish Rothschild banksters - it all began when they realized they could take a tiny portion of the taxes earmarked to ensure our roads, watermains, sewers, electrical grids, air water and food inspections, hospitals firefighters police and military - the core job of government being as our largest collectively-owned insurance company, to defend our basic needs - to cater to their own and their followers' private wants, by leveraging it to pay a tiny bit of interest on huge loans to reward them selves with.

And they could thus expand their own fiedoms and powers by rewarding them selves their own families business partners friends and even some of followers without impacting the public services they were tasked to provide - until they had rinsed and repeated it too many times, and now they spend over 50% of the yearly tax budget on paying the sale-delaying bribes called 'interest' alone, which means they now have only half the money left to pay to fix much less expand that same basic infrastructure they swore to protect.

So now they're forced to force us to squat in place on the old crumbling infrastructure, to build up rather than outwards, as they angrily fear the loss of their own powers perks paychecks and secure pensions and 'projectively' blame us for OUR "unsustainable" greedy lifestyles, when what they really mean is they're scared they can't sustain their borrow and spend ones!

So they will herd us into tiny 15-minute neighbourhoods in their SM.A.R..T. (Surveillance Monitored Analyzed by Reporting Technology cities, eating ze bugs and happily owning nothing while they fuck off to their rewards on corporate directors boards in their make-work do-nothing "jobs" in China and Israel, while they gas us with their airborne "vaccines" like the dumb cornered rats their media has dummied us down to the level of!

IN CONCLUSION:

And the gist of these memoranda implicitly call for the destruction of all evidence of all past crimes; re:

"The overriding objective of the law is the avoidance of harm to society and that is a sufficiently substantial concern to warrant a restriction on freedom of expression.""

As such, it sets a very bad precedent, and in fact implicitly calls for the destruction of all precedents in criminal cases - and by extension in all civil cases as well.

For example, if the records of a criminal case where criminals had committed crimes against their innocent victims were to always be destroyed, to ensure that no one else could ever learn that the crimes had been committed, and also how, allegedly to protect the victims' feelings and to prevent anyone from ever learning how to commit new crimes along similar lines, it would also destroy the ability of the courts to set and learn from precedents in order to punish crimes, and it would also prevent our legislatures from learning from past crimes how to legislate against similar crimes in future.

The emotions-based, literally thought-killing ("psychotic") feeling behind this is that "Ignorance is bliss, and so if we destroy all records of past crimes, then no one will ever be able to imagine how to invent and perpetrate new crimes in future, either! Whee!"

Thus: "Destroying all evidence of past crimes is the best public policy to prevent future crimes. The best way to "avoid harm to society" is to deny to the public any knowledge that crimes can be committed, and how, lest the evidence of same serve as hate-inducing "crime propaganda!" Because if and when people learn about crimes, they will be instantly corrupted by them as "hate propaganda" to want to commit them!"

This is the level of retard cops are: "The only way to prevent crimes and catch criminals is by destroying all evidence of their crimes first!"

In the current example, let's just pretend that even if the Nazis were evil criminals, and the Jews their utterly blameless innocent victims, then despite the Jews' Nazi enemy criminals having already been caught and punished for their crimes by being defeated in WWII, no evidence of "Muh Holocaust!" shall be allowed to remain on the public record to hurt their feelings!

Is that really what the Jews behind this golem of a legislation want, or have they, simply by creating it, as always also thereby caused it to turn on them again, as usual?

After all, "If people learn about the Hate-ocaust, that knowledge alone will incite them to re-commit it!" 

Because all goyims are just intrinsically, inherently, inexplicably "Anti-Semitic!"

So, thanks, Jews!

;-)

Also available for your files to peruse and download from the CBSA's own website in handy .PDF format here:

https://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/dm-md/d9/d9-1-15-eng.pdf

https://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/dm-md/d9/d9-1-17-eng.pdf

THE SPECIFIC ONGOING CASE SO FAR:

The final decision has yet to be made, but a female agent is in charge, (never a good thing) which means she's emotionally predisposed to act "hatefully" towards those who "display hate" no matter what or whom its righteous target may or may not be.

I've already drafted a response if they ask for it  - but even if I offer it, I'm SURE they will reject is, because it's based on logic, while they are programmed to act on emotion - after all, their whole focus is on subjectively determining the supposedly objective nature of my alleged "hate!"

And to prove it, the growly customs cop I spoke with on the phone (the same self-entitled asshole who 'flagged' my book) said I'd probably get to keep the Fuhrer Standard drink coasters and Nazi coin which were also included in my Christmas order, just not the Nazi book. There is no rational rationale behind what they do; it's all only based on their own emotions!

So even in advance of me being able to read the book which I paid good money to buy, they are tasked with preventing me form doing so because, allegedly just by letting me read it to learn its contents, I am somehow also presumed to be propagating "hateful" propaganda, and they can thereby somehow also determine in advance that I will be actively committing crimes by inciting violence in public.

In other words, they are pretending to be able to defensively, pre-emptively prevent in advance the alleged crimes they have illegally empowered them selves presume, without any need for any evidence at all, to somehow know in advance that I will "surely" commit!

But really, when you make "hate" into a crime, you only make it "illegal" to hate crimes - and the criminals who commit them.

Which seems to me to be the point of all this: to cover up crimes by blaming the potential victims for "hatefully" daring to Notice them.

Therefore (it's now a matter of principle to me!) I contacted the vendor (since obviously while the border cop was able to rip open my package and thumb his grubby rookers through my pristine book, I still didn't know its contents, since said Thought Police won't let me even see it) and he very promptly and helpfully gave me a list of the chapter titles, (having contacted the publisher?) to give me a better descriptor to use against them, too - so I will now be able to, at the very least, sue them in Small Claims Court for stealing my property.

From his helpful assessment, it should become obvious even to these self-blinded drones of "our" politicians' current global (((masters))) that:

"The publisher of the book is "Preuss Academic Review" and it's sold as a English language review of period literature. The price alone signifies it is not meant as propaganda as it's market is clearly those with a serious  academic/historical interest in the topic being discussed. From the chapter titles alone there sure doesn't seem to be anything in it that meets their criteria of hate propaganda advocating genocide etc etc. Chapters include:

Europe Becomes Healthy Again

The River of Heredity

Europe - Peasant Land

Duty

Germanic Piety

Faith and Hardness

If you want the daughter - look at the mother.

Eternal German Love Song

My Husband is not dead. He lives on in my children

Soul of the Woman

The Frankish Empire

How did our ancestors live ?

The moral foundations of Germanic Piety

Germanic man under the palm trees

The Great King ( Friedrich the Great)

Beauty with the SS rune (article on Allach porcelian)

Duty - The virtue of the Prussians

;-)