Wednesday, August 24, 2016

Destroy Yourselves "FOR THE CHILDREN!"

From here:

It’s fun to watch the media squirm sometimes. We all saw the dead child face down in the sand months ago as sign that anyone who didn’t condone the invasion and destruction of Europe was a racist child murdering bigot. More recently, we saw the image of Omran Daqneesh, a Syrian child bloodied and covered with dust, sitting silently in an ambulance awaiting help after his family’s house was destroyed by an airstrike allegedly carried out by Russian backed Assad forces.

We are reminded of the human cost of war and our sympathy is commanded toward far away peoples who would see us dead if they had the means. We are then ordered to give them said means, by way of open immigration and even government subsidies therefor.

We’re supposed to forget the fact that welfare funded “refugees” in the United States have already gone on to fight for ISIS. We’re not supposed to take into consideration the fact that the National Intelligence Director says ISIS will infiltrate refugee populations to stage attacks. We’re supposed to forget that tens of thousands of “refugees” are already in the United States, that some have already committed horrific terrorist attacks, that terrorist attacks in Europe are hardly even newsworthy anymore, and that some of these attackers are second generation invaders born and raised to kill inside our own countries. All this, for the children.

Then we get those little reminders that not all children are quite the innocent victims the photos lead us to believe. A child blew up a wedding in Turkey killing dozens, and most of his victims were under 14 years old. Another child attempted to set off a suicide vest in Iraq, but he was stopped and stripped of his explosives before they could be detonated. ISIS calls their child soldiers “Cubs of the Caliphate” and parades them around in their propaganda proudly.

Their attitude toward children is “Screw it, we’ll make more”. Meanwhile white people are quitting breeding for climate change, and to check their white privilege to the point that America’s birth rates are now a national emergency.

Forgive me then if I seem a bit unconvinced when leftists cry out “for the children”. If they loved children so much, they would stop burdening them with debt before they are born. They would stop subsidizing birth control and abortion so that more would be born. They certainly wouldn’t be importing murderous welfare dependent savages at the expense of future generations, or disarming the parents who would protect the children therefrom. They hate children because children represent the continuation of our society, and they want our society to end.


Similarly,  if the liberals were so "for the children," as noted recently elsewhere, such that they pretend "if banning guns could save just one child, it'd be worth it!" then why not apply the same logic such that "if banning muslims could save just one child from being bombed or raped" it'd be worth it, too - no? But if libertine "liberal" criminals are anything definable, they are total racists and hypocrites!


Tuesday, August 23, 2016

Obama is Still Trying to Give Away the Internet!

From here:

The sponsorship below reflects the opinions & representations of the advertiser, & not necessarily the opinion of Patriot Update.

Center For Individual Freedom


Now that Drudge is leading with this story, perhaps people are now paying attention to the fact that Barack Obama is giving away the Internet to a quasi United Nations organization in a little over a month.

We're going to cut right to the chase. Republican and Democrat elites in Congress, who are beholden to international fat-cats, are hoping and praying that you won't call or fax them because they have the power to easily stop this Internet surrender, but they would really prefer just to let it happen.

We've seen a lack of outrage lately. They've noticed it on Capitol Hill as well. The bottom line is that the power to stop this Internet giveaway is dependent on you and other patriotic Americans making your voices heard. If we sit on our heels and do nothing, then we lose all right to gripe when China and Cuba take control of our Internet.

Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Member of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.

Send My Blast Faxes

Obama Plotting To Give Away Your Internet To Iran, Russia, China, North Korea And Cuba!

Senator Ted Cruz calls what Obama is doing a "great threat" and The Blaze reports that Cruz claims this Internet surrender would "allow foreign governments to prohibit speech that they don't agree with."

Senators Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, James Lankford, Ben Sasse and Tom Cotton have introduced S.3034, the Protecting Internet Freedom Act, to stop Barack Obama from single-handedly handing over control of your Internet to global stakeholders, but this legislation is tied up in committee.

Why is this critical legislation in a holding pattern? The sad truth is that a number of fat-cat global corporations with deep pockets SUPPORT it, and unless patriotic Americans speak up right now, Barack Obama and these corporate fat-cats will get their way as their surrender of Internet control and our Internet freedoms become reality.

Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Member of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.

Send My Blast Faxes

"The United States Cannot Allow Authoritarian Regimes To Increase Their Influence Over The Core Operating Functions Of The Internet. -Senator Ted Cruz

If what Barack Obama is trying to do sounds familiar, it should. This is not his first attempt to hand over control of your Internet to a United Nations-style global multi-stakeholder community.

The Hill reports: "In 2014, the Commerce Department's National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) announced it would begin a long-planned transition to give up its oversight to a global multi-stakeholder community."

We alerted you to what was going on back then and patriotic Americans, like you, rose up and generated tens of thousands of calls and Blast Faxes to our legislators in Washington... and we thought that this Obama scheme was dead.

But those who want to take your liberties away never give up. Those who want to give away your Internet to a consortium of third world thugs and tyrants kept working quietly, behind the scenes, and now that Barack Obama's reign is coming to an end, they're going to take one last bite at the apple.

Well guess what? We beat them before and we can beat them again and hopefully we'll beat them once and for all, but it's not going to be easy.

As we've already said, special interests with very deep pockets support this plan to give your Internet away to the thugocracies of the world. Politicians are hoping and praying that you're not paying attention to what is going on, and Congress will only put a stop to this Internet giveaway if they hear from you right now.

Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Member of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.

Send My Blast Faxes

What Others Are Saying About The Dangers...

There are some who are addressing the dangers and what they are saying should be a major cause for alarm:

- "The United States owes nothing to 'international stakeholders' who are determined to make the Internet look more like the United Nations." -The Washington Times Editorial Board

- "Every American should worry about Obama giving up control of the internet to an undefined group. This is very, very dangerous." - Newt Gingrich

- "The Obama administration has played into the hands of authoritarian regimes. In 2011, Vladimir Putin—who, as Russia took over Crimea in recent days, shut down many online critics and independent media—set a goal of 'international control over the Internet.'" - L. Gordon Crovitz, Former publisher of The Wall Street Journal

- "Regimes around the world are dangerously intent on squashing Internet freedom. We must be very careful not to allow them to extend their influence over the very core of the Internet." - Dr. Jerry A. Johnson, President & CEO, National Religious Broadcasters

- "The abdication of U.S. oversight of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) would have serious consequences for our national security interests and Constitutional freedoms." – Center for Security Policy

And do not deceive yourself, the international bad boys won't stop at regulating speech on the Internet. You can be certain that they're also planning to come after your wallet, because what can be regulated, can also be taxed.

It's up to Congress to stop Obama... but it's up to you to force Congress to do what must be done and the time to force Congress to do what must be done is now. We must demand that they pass S.3034, the Protecting Internet Freedom Act, before Barack Obama gives your Internet away to the thugocracies of the world.

Use the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every Member of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.

Send My Blast Faxes

Center For Individual Freedom

Center for Individual Freedom
815 King Street
Suite 303
Alexandria, VA 22314
Phone: 703-535-5836
Fax: 703-535-5838

CFIF is a 501(c)(4) not-for-profit constitutional advocacy organization with the mission to protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights. Contributions to CFIF are not deductible as charitable contributions for federal income tax purposes.

Copyright © 2016. is a member of Liberty Alliance. All rights reserved.

147 Ponderosa Trail | Dallas, GA 30132

Sponsorships like the above enable us to continue to bring you the latest news and information free of charge. Please note that the above message reflects the opinions and representations of the advertiser alone, and not necessarily the opinion or editorial positions of Patriot Update.

Tuesday, August 16, 2016

ICJ Exonerates Milosevic; Media Silent

From The Ottawa Citizen, Tuesday 16 August 2016, P#A7, and here:

When Yugoslavia disintegrated into civil war, Serbs, Croats and Muslims indulged in a horror show of mutual mass murder. With the Serbs tapped as the biggest villains, the Western media focused in on Milosevic and vilified him as a modern day Hitler. He was blamed for starting the war and accused of genocide and ethnic cleansing against Bosnian Muslims and Croats.
After much handwringing and rhetorical outrage, Canada, along with other Western nations dispatched thousands of peacekeepers to quell the slaughter, and took part in a NATO bombing campaign against Serbia. Nonetheless, about 140,000 died in what are referred to as the Yugoslav wars between 1991 and 2001.
Seems it was the wrong call, at least to some extent. Earlier this year, in a decision that received minimal media attention, the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) exonerated Milosevic.
Milosevic, the tribunal ruled in late March, wanted to prevent the breakup of Yugoslavia, and while he initially supported Bosnian Serb leaders to that end, there is no evidence he was part of a “joint criminal enterprise” to victimize Muslims and Croats.
“Based on the evidence before the Chamber regarding the diverging interests that emerged between the Bosnian Serb and Serbian leaderships during the conflict and in particular, Milosevic’s repeated criticism and disapproval of the policies and decisions made by … the Bosnian Serb leadership, the Chamber is not satisfied that there was sufficient evidence presented in this case to find that Slobodan Milosevic agreed with the common plan” to forcibly remove Muslims and Croats from territory claimed by Bosnian Serbs.
Indeed, Milosevic “openly criticised Bosnian Serb leaders … (for) committing ‘crimes against humanity’ and ‘ethnic cleansing.’”
No doubt, Milosevic would have appreciated those words. Only he wasn’t around to hear them. After losing power in 2001, a new pro-Western Serbian government turned him over to the ICTY. Then Canadian Supreme Court justice Louise Arbour, acting as tribunal prosecutor at the time, indicted him as a war criminal. He spent five years locked up only to die of heart failure in 2006 in the midst of his trial.
The media that characterized Milosevic as a moral monster – often cast as the “butcher of the Balkans” – has effectivly ignored his posthumous exoneration. Searches of Google News and other databases turned up no stories in the Canadian media and only a few in other Western outlets.
The ICTY probably likes it that way. The Milosevic case is buried in a 2,950-page ruling the tribunal issued March 24 after convicting former Bosnian Serb leader Radozan Karadzic of war crimes.
Karadzic’s 40-year prison sentence garnered widespread media coverage, but it seems few journalists turned to page 1,235 to read the nine pages devoted to Milosevic.
Not every journalist, however. “The butcher wasn’t a butcher after all,” Scott Taylor, the editor of Esprit de Corps magazine writes in a recent edition. “The ICTY makes it clear that Milosevic actually helped to force the Bosnian Serb leader to sign the 1995 Dayton Accord Peace agreement.”
The Milosevic ruling also vindicates those who didn’t think he was the villain that Western powers, especially the United States, made him out to be.
“The idea that he started (the war) is completely false,” says James Bissett, who served as Canada’s ambassador to Yugoslavia in the early 1990s and testified on Milosevic’s behalf. “I don’t think he was guilty of wanting a ‘Greater Serbia’ or genocide.”
Will those who vilified (SLANDERED) Milosevic admit they were wrong?
Not likely.
As Bissett puts it: “Even in the early days, it was apparent that most of the media reporting about the cause and course of the Yugoslav fighting was biased. In effect, the Serbs were branded as the bad guys, and any news developments were interpreted on that basis.”
It seems that when governments need a bad guy to justify questionable actions, propaganda supersedes the truth.

Wednesday, August 10, 2016


From HERE:

Hillary Clinton Medical Records Leaked???? Dementia, Partial Seizures Noted On Alleged Leaked Docs - Twitter Account of Whistleblower Disappears


By Susan Duclos - All News PipeLine

We have shown why we believe Hillary Clinton is unfit, physically and mentally, to become President of the United States, using video footage, testimonies and images through the years to show visual proof of our assertion, but last night and Twiiter account named @HillsMedlRecords claimed that documents they uploaded are of Hillary Clinton's medical records from 2014 and 2015.

If these documents are real.... it is over for Hillary.

The original Tweet has since been removed by Twitter as the @HillsMedRecords user page no longer exists, butscreencaps show she/he  listed a note in their profile that stated "I hate to do this, but people need to need to know. Dr. Bardack was not honest about Hillary Clinton's health and I have proof."


The reference is to Dr. Lisa Bardack, who is on record as Hillary Clinton's Physician, who in July 2015, issued a statement claiming "Mrs. Clinton is a healthy female with hypothyroidism and seasonal allergies, on long-term anticoagulation. She participates in a healthy lifestyle and has had a full medical evaluation, which reveals no evidence of additional medical issues or cardiovascular disease. Her cancer screening evaluations are all negative. She is in excellent physical condition and fit to serve as President of the United States."

The whistleblower account now shows up as "Sorry, that page doesn't exist," but the documents he or she claimed were Hillary's medical records, live on as people downloaded and reuploaded them and are sharing them still.


The first is purportedly from February 5, 2014, stating the "present complaint" is "Blacking out for short periods of time, uncontrollable twitching, memory loss, fatigue.

It lists a Interim Medical History, Medical Examination, then the Diagnosis of "Complex Partial Seizures, Subcortical Vascular Dementia"


The second document the user claimed was leaked Clinton medical records is dated March 20, 2015, listing "Dizziness, fatigue, mini-seizures, memory loss" as the "Present complaint" for that office visit. Diagnosis on that document also states "Complex Partial Seizures, Subcortical Vascular Dementia."


According to Cleveland Clinic, Subcortical Vascular Dementia is described in the following manner, along with the symptoms... emphasis mine:

Subcortical vascular dementia, also called Binswanger's disease, is caused by widespread, microscopic areas of damage to the brain resulting from the thickening and narrowing (atherosclerosis) of arteries that supply blood to the subcortical areas of the brain. Atherosclerosis (commonly known as "hardening of the arteries") is a systemic process that affects blood vessels throughout the body. It begins late in the fourth decade of life and increases in severity with age. As the arteries become more and more narrowed, the blood supplied by those arteries decreases and brain tissue dies.

Brain imaging shows the brain lesions typical of the disease and is essential for an accurate diagnosis. The most characteristic feature of vascular dementia is psychomotor slowness - an increase in the length of time it takes, for example, for the fingers to turn the thought of a letter into the shape of a letter on a piece of paper. Other symptoms include forgetfulness (but not as severe as the forgetfulness of Alzheimer's disease), changes in speech, unsteady gait, clumsiness or frequent falls, changes in personality or mood or urinary symptoms.

John Hopkins describes Complex Partial Seizures in the following manner:

Complex partial seizures can begin in any lobe of the brain, but cause alteration of awareness due to spreading of seizure activity. 

Complex partial seizures are often preceded by a simple partial seizure (aura). An aura is often described as a warning and can manifest in several different ways, such as a sense of fear, a funny feeling in the body, déjà vu, etc.

Patients experiencing a complex partial seizure may stare blankly into space, or experience automatisms (non-purposeful, repetitive movements).

EMEDICINE highlights a couple points under their "Impaired consciousness," category that explains how Clinton can function publicly, even after a mini-seizure, and why some are claiming that one of her protective detail members is truly a "handler."

Usually, during a complex partial seizure, the patient is unresponsive and does not remember events that occurred - Although patients typically do not respond to external stimuli, they may make simple verbal responses; follow simple commands; or continue to perform simple or, less commonly, complex motor behaviors (eg, operating a car)

Hillary Clinton's latest "brain-freeze" caught on camera:


If these documents are real and that is a big IF, then they would explain Hillary Clinton's apparent "seizures" caught on video, her weird behavior, her frequent documented falls, her inability to even climb stairs on her own... and so much more. 

There is no doubt that whoever the supposed "whistleblower" is that they are familiar with medical sysmptoms, because they understood the relevance of those particular diagnoses in conjunction with the very public sysmptoms shown by Hillary Clinton indicating some serious medical health issues.

Wednesday, August 3, 2016

DOJ's Hillary-donor "investigates" IRS tea-party targeting!


Obama Donor/DOJ Prosecutor Spent 1529.25 Hours Investigating the IRS’ Targeting of Conservative Groups -Judicial Watch released a letter from the Justice Department admitting that Democratic Party/Obama campaign donor and Justice Department attorney Barbara Bosserman spent 1,529.25 ...READ MORE
FBI Interviews with Cincinnati IRS Employees Reveal DC Headquarters Delayed Tea Party Applications -Judicial Watch released 105 pages of newly obtained Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) “302” documents revealing that, beginning in 2010 and lasting through the Obama reelection...READ MORE
FBI Investigation Documents of IRS Scandal -Judicial Watch released 294 pages of new Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) “302” documents revealing that top Washington IRS officials, including Lois Lerner and Holly Paz, knew that the agency was specifically targeting “Tea Party” and other...READ MORE
DOJ Rewards Law-Breaking Sanctuary Cities, States with $342 Mil in “Grants” -The Obama administration rewards sanctuary states, counties and cities that shield violent illegal immigrants from deportation with hundreds of millions of dollars in federal grants and one of the biggest recipients recently...READ MORE

Saturday, July 30, 2016

Daniel Pipes is a Muslim

Here's his own confession, in his own words:

"Counter"-Terrorism is TREASON!

From here:

Nice attack: Why the terrorists are winning the intelligence war — Spengler

"Yet another criminal known to security services has perpetrated a mass killing, the Tunisian Mohamed Lahouaiej-Bouhlel. Why did the French police allow a foreign national with a criminal record of violence to reside in France? Apart from utter incompetence, the explanation is that he was a snitch for the French authorities. Blackmailing Muslim criminals to inform on prospective terrorists is the principal activity of European counter-terrorism agencies, as I noted in 2015. Every Muslim in Europe knows this.
The terrorists, though, have succeeded in turning the police agents sent to spy on them and forcing them to commit suicide attacks to expiate their sins. This has become depressingly familiar; as Ryan Gallagher reported recently, perpetrators already known to the authorities committed ten of the highest-profile attacks between 2013 and 2015.
The terrorists, in other words, are adding insult to injury. By deploying police snitches as suicide attackers, terrorists assert their moral superiority and power over western governments. The message may be lost on the western public, whose security agencies and media do their best to obscure it, but it is well understood among the core constituencies of the terrorist groups: the superiority of Islam turns around the depraved criminals whom the western police send to spy on us, and persuades them to become martyrs for the cause of Islam.

These attacks, in other words, are designed to impress the Muslim public as much as they are intended to horrify the western public. In so many words, the terrorists tell Muslims that western police agencies cannot protect them. If they cooperate with the police they will be found out and punished.  The West fears the power of Islam: it evinces such fear by praising Islam as a religion of peace, by squelching dissent in the name of fighting supposed Islamophobia, and by offering concessions and apologies to Muslims. Ordinary Muslims live in fear of the terror networks, which have infiltrated their communities and proven their ability to turn the efforts of western security services against them. They are less likely to inform on prospective terrorists and more likely to aid them by inaction.

The terrorists, in short, are winning the intelligence war, because they have shaped the environment in which intelligence is gathered and traded. But that is how intelligence wars always proceed: spies switch sides and tell their stories because they want to be with the winner. ISIS and al-Qaeda look like winners in the eyes of western Muslim populations after humiliating the security services of the West.

As a result, western European Muslims fear the terrorists more than they fear the police. The West will remain vulnerable to mass terror attacks until the balance of fear shifts in the other direction."