Friday, March 24, 2017

Criminal's Creed, the Movie

I just saw the "Assassins' Creed" movie last night, and it sums up evil pretending to be good:

1) There is no truth!
2) Everything is allowed!
3) We hide in darkness to serve the Light!

I think those video games and movie are designed to indoctrinate our kids into becoming leftists "and" muslims (same thing/s; i.e: criminals)!

But what "light" could they serve, when it's not the Truth, and everything including lying, is allowed?! Lucifer's?!

Because those three statements embrace the islamic creed itself, and also the libertine "liberal" criminal's brazen rule of chaos!

In reality, civilized people rely on and agree to be bound to the Golden Rule of Law, which most simply defines morality as "Do Not Attack First!" and therefore all is in fact forbidden, unless and until very specifically agreed to, between people!

So we can do nothing either TO, or FOR, each other, without first asking permission.

And so our only real right is to not be attacked first, and our only corollary, concomitant responsibility, is to not attack (thereby innocent) other people first!

Agreeing to the principle of this Rule gets us trust, economic progress, and civilizations, and countries of Makers.

The brazen rule of criminal chaos, on the other hand, is that one can always attack first (everything is allowed, unless and until very specifically denied)! So we get cases where people say "Sure, I took your stuff, but you didn't post any signs saying I couldn't take it, especially not on a Tuesday from between 10:13 AM and 2:47 PM!" And of course Muhammad used this to assert that, if he got away with committing his crimes (and he tried them all, many times, and instead of showing contrition, told others how much fun it was, for instance, to rape children, and urged them to join in the fun!) then "god" had always wanted him to commit them, and since god had sanctioned his crimes, then they were never really crimes at all!

Living in areas under this creed, where everyone's time is taken up plotting attacks and defenses against other families, clans, and tribe's attacks, gets them distrust, economic stagnation, and savage barbarity (see all the so-called "islamic" countries) - countries full of criminal Takers,  living in dirt and ruins, where all the Makers were driven extinct!


Beyond that, the plot is insane: the Templars (the movie's bad guys) have always wanted to take over the world and control everybody (yeah, because they weren't in reality a reaction opposing islam's own clearly-stated global conquest and freedom-of-thought-supressing goals, but hey, it's a video game, right?) so they want to eliminate whatever instinct to violence exists in man, taking him over and "forcing" and enslaving him against his will, to be violent. So okay, the setting has the Assassins (yes, descendants of the very same islamic Ismaeli Alamut Hashishim of olde, sans the Aga Khan) creed (or secret society or old boys' and girls' club, not just a declaration of anti-moral principles) formed from these humans who are allegedly helplessly enslaved by violence (so far, so islamic)

Sura 4:77: Those who whined "Hold back your hands (from attacking)" were corrected:
"War is compulsory for us - the good and bad both come from allah!"

BUT then, the Templar's evil plan revolves around REMOVING FREE WILL - a concept which the allegedly islamic Assassin's Creed members unanimously oppose!

So, to reiterate: They are allegedly forced to be violent genetic killers by nature, but removing their free will itself is the solution which they all fear will negate their violent tendencies?!

Even worse, the alleged success of the 'evil' Templars' plan involved them using an ancient artifact known as the Apple of Eden (Yes, THAT apple!) which allegedly holds the genetic key to free will.

So human free will can allegedly be turned on and off, in everyone, by this mechanical device.

And the Assassins (and Spain's last islamic Sultan, Muhammad) are the magic bauble's guardians.

But wait! Islam doesn't not only not believe in free will, it also doesn't believe in Original Sin!

The whole Biblical "Garden of Eden" story was re-written by Muhammad in his Qur'an, to remove the whole alleged reason for mans' expulsion from the Garden - no snake, no apple, no Sin at all! And further, it makes Cain the hero of Genesis, and Abel the villain (but I digress again LOL)!

So in conclusion, the movie is (and, one must presume, the videogames them selves are) total criminal nonsense.
Even worse, they're still totally EVIL criminal nonsense which is aimed at gullible and impressionable young minds.

Ryan's RINOcare designed to punk Trump

From here:

Today at 3:30pm the US House of Representatives is scheduled to vote on a bill to “repeal and replace” the Affordable Care Act, aka ObamaCare. Whatever the outcome of the vote, the president is being sabotaged by Paul Ryan and other (((moderate))) Republicans.
Radical Agenda EP280 - Mr. Speaker
Radical Agenda EP280 – Mr. Speaker

Today at 3:30pm the US House of Representatives is scheduled to vote on a bill to "repeal and replace" the Affordable Care Act, aka ObamaCare. Whatever the outcome of the vote, the president is being sabotaged by Paul Ryan and other (((moderate))) Republicans.
Even with the tweaks made in effort to appease conservatives, the proposed measure will do little to alleviate the catastrophic and predictable consequences of the current law. As long as the federal government compels insurance companies to cover so called "pre-existing conditions" it is impossible to have a private health insurance industry without massive government subsidies. That of course, was the entire purpose of the ACA in the first place. Democrats set out to destroy the private healthcare market, with the intent of nationalizing it when costs became so high that nobody could afford it. That collapse is upon us, and whatever token effort the GOP makes to mitigate the damage, they will be bailing out Democrats at the expense of the President.
Any purported plan to have a second and third phase of the process will be sabotaged by this fact. In order to pass more meaningful reforms, the GOP will need to gain at least 8 seats in the Senate, and since most Senate Republicans might as well be Democrats, we would realistically need a lot more than that. This is going to be impossible when the liberal media is fed millions of disaffected sick people who lost their insurance subsidies. Every problem resulting from the passage of this bill will have blame placed directly on the shoulders of President Trump and congressional Republicans. Every resource at the disposal of the Democrat party and other leftist institutions will be poured into focusing on the perceived negative consequences of its passage, and barely any Democrats will miss the opportunity to show up at the voting booth in 2018 and 2020 to make their dissatisfaction known. In short, the passage of this bill will directly result in the loss of Republican political power, rendering impossible any attempt to pass greater reforms in the future.
Rand Paul seems to be about the only voice of reason on the subject, even if his reasoning is a tad off. He suggests passing a bill to repeal Obamacare, to the extent such a thing can be done through the reconciliation process, bypassing the need for 60 votes in the Senate. He then suggests a replacement bill should be voted on the same day, and he seems to mistakenly believe this will result in a more conservative outcome.
The advantage of passing the repeal separately from the replacement is not that it will result in a more conservative outcome, but rather that it will compel the cooperation of Democrats. If Obamacare is repealed outright, with no replacement at all, I predict that some number of Democrats would be willing to vote with moderate Republicans on a replacement plan that keeps such measures as the purpose defeating compulsory coverage of "pre-existing conditions".
That cooperation will serve as fuel for primary challenges against congressional Republicans who would sooner vote with Democrats than their fellow Republicans to the right. It also gives the impression of bipartisan support, which some Americans are stupid enough to believe is a positive. More importantly, it will mitigate the blame Republicans take for the fallout, thereby preserving some chance of obtaining greater majorities in the next two elections.
I for one have a difficult time believing that any of this is lost on Paul Ryan. He is sabotaging the Trump administration on purpose, the same way he did when he called Trump's comments about a La Raza member "the definition of a racist comment". For Ryan, this vote is a win-win. Either the bill will pass, and its disastrous consequences will be blamed on the president, or the bill will fail and the President will look weak. The only thing Paul Ryan has to avoid in order to accomplish his goals, is something that actually improves the conditions of the American economy.

Our only hope is that President Trump is already aware of this on some level. One could imagine a shrewd negotiator like Donald Trump feigning ignorance and playing the sucker right now, as a longer term strategy to purge the GOP of saboteurs like Ryan at a later date. If Ryan tanks healthcare reform now, few would blame the President for financing a primary challenger in 2018, and we can all but guarantee a new Speaker of the House as Ryan's last shreds of credibility fade from the minds of the public.

Thursday, March 23, 2017

Court Rules in Favor of Police Who Pounded on Wrong Door, Didn't Identify Themselves, Then Killed Innocent Man for Holding a Gun

Still think the Government, Cops and Courts exist to protect you from (the other) criminals?!

From here:

March 23, 2017

ATLANTA, Ga. — According to a federal appeals court, police will not be held accountable for banging on the wrong door at 1:30 am, failing to identify themselves as police, and then repeatedly shooting and killing the innocent homeowner who answered the door while holding a gun in self-defense. Although 26-year-old Andrew Scott had committed no crime and never fired a single bullet or lifted his firearm against police, he was gunned down by police who were investigating a speeding incident by engaging in a middle-of-the-night “knock and talk” in Scott’s apartment complex.
In ruling in favor of qualified immunity for police, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has given law enforcement agencies further incentives to engage in aggressive “knock and talk” practices, which have become thinly veiled, warrantless exercises by which citizens are coerced and intimidated into “talking” with heavily armed police who “knock” on their doors in the middle of the night.
“Government officials insist that there is nothing unlawful, unreasonable or threatening about the prospect of armed police dressed in SWAT gear knocking on doors in the middle of night and ‘asking’ homeowners to engage in warrantless ‘knock-and-talk’ sessions,” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People. “However, as Andrew Scott learned, there’s always a price to pay for saying no to such heavy-handed requests by police. If the courts continue to sanction such aggressive, excessive, coercive ‘knock-and-shoot’ tactics, it will give police further incentive to terrorize and kill American citizens without fear of repercussion.”
On July 15, 2012, Deputy Richard Sylvester spotted a speeding motorcycle while on patrol in Lake County, Florida. Sylvester pursued the motorcycle in his patrol car but lost sight of it. Subsequent reports caused Sylvester to believe that the motorcyclist might be armed, was wanted by another police department, and had been spotted at a nearby apartment complex. Arriving at the complex around 1:30 a.m., Sylvester and three other deputies began knocking on doors close to where a motorcycle was parked, starting with Apartment 114, where a light was on inside. Apartment 114 was occupied by Andrew Scott and Amy Young, who were playing video games and had no connection to the motorcycle or any illegal activity.
Assuming tactical positions surrounding the door to Apartment 114, the deputies had their guns drawn and ready to shoot. Sylvester, without announcing he was a police officer, then banged loudly and repeatedly on the door, causing a neighbor to open his door. When questioned by a deputy, the neighbor explained that the motorcycle’s owner did not live in Apartment 114. This information was not relayed to Sylvester. Unnerved by the banging at such a late hour, Andrew Scott retrieved his handgun before opening the door. When Scott saw a shadowy figure holding a gun outside his door, he retreated into his apartment only to have Sylvester immediately open fire. Sylvester fired six shots, three of which hit and killed Scott. A trial court subsequently ruled in favor of the police, ruling that Scott was to blame for choosing to retrieve a handgun before opening the door.
On appeal, the Eleventh Circuit ruled that Sylvester was protected by “qualified immunity,” reasoning that the use of excessive force did not violate “clearly established law.” Four judges dissented with the majority’s ruling, likening the “knock and talk” to a “knock and shoot” and rejecting the idea that Scott caused the shooting by exercising his Second Amendment right through his possession of a firearm.

Arguing with the Clarion Project Apologists for Islam

Dajjal asked me to blog about this, since libtarded leftopathy is so endemic these days. And naturally, being censorious fascists, they have no comments section in which we could to reply; so: From here:

Stand up Against Anti-Muslim Bigotry

No-one wants to feel victimized for things they didn’t do. Targeting ordinary Muslims for the actions of radicals is unfair and unjust. It also harms the fight against radical Islam. Increased anti-Muslim sentiment creates a sense of fear which makes Muslim activists less inclined to trust non-Muslims to defend their liberties and interests. If Muslims feel threatened in this way, they will be less willing and able to engage in difficult conversations about extremism.

For the radicals, anti-Muslim bigotry make fertile ground for recruitment, since it enables them to stoke a sense of grievance in the vulnerable people they are seeking to radicalize. Anti-Muslim bigotry and radical Islam empower each other. Say no to both and challenge anti-Musim bigotry whenever and wherever you find it.

Read and share our statement on anti-Muslim bigotry.

=======WHAT. THE. HELL! =======

It should never be allowed by backwards people to be considered “illegal” to accuse these criminals (muslims) of their crimes, allegedly because the painful truth might offend them or hurt their feelings, and so “make” them commit even more crimes!

No problem was ever solved by ignoring it, and we aren't doing even any of these muslims (whose own ancestors were among Muhammad's first victims) any favours by going along with any of their historic lies and alibi excuses for their crimes.

Pretending islam is just another religion like all the others, hijacked by some con-men, is wrong.

That's only a parochial, Western-based and ethnocentrist approach to islam.

Islam is NOT only not a real religion which could be and is sometimes only occasionally misunderstood and/or taken advantage of by a few evil persons.

It's not also - as are all the other, "real" religions - only an opinion presented as a fact (i.e: only a simple case of delusive criminal fraud)!

Islam is really an actual threat to everyone because IT says it is, not because we misinterpreted it.

The Qur'an is more than just another flawed book of confusing, contradictory superstitious nonsense, it's evil.

According to their own Eastern histories, islam has an official 1,400 year history of "holy" lies, extortions, robberies, tortures, arsons, kindappings, slaveries, rapes and 270 million murders: that's OVER A QUARTER-BILLION INNOCENTS SACRIFICED TO ALLAH, so far!

For a detailed breakdown of historical islamic depredations by region and era, just Google for: "Tears of Jihad."

Islam has a larger death-tally than that of EVERYONE ELSE, both secular and religious, COMBINED, and with an historical average of less than 1% of the global population to have committed it with, too!

Do the math: 270 million divided by 1,400 is almost 200,000 per year, or over 500 per day, or over 20 per hour or about one person every three minutes being murdered by Muslims ever since Islam was founded.

So, simply and precisely because of their "THOU SHALT KILL!" cultural indoctrination, MUSLIMS ARE STILL FROM BETWEEN FOUR AND SEVERAL HUNDRED TIMES MORE LIKELY TO ENGAGE IN MURDER (and all other crimes,) THAN EVERYONE ELSE IN THE WORLD!

Islam is the greatest ongoing threat to humanity the world has ever yet known. But, to leftopaths, when islamic terrorists attack Infidels and then the infidel says please stop, that is the cause of the attack.

The Qur'an and islam itself should be banned, and all muslims resisted and exiled, because everything muslims pretend to believe is "holy" is already a crime!


Stop asking liberals like these Clarion Project creeps to use "logic" to debate "facts!" Psycho-paths (aka thought-killers) prefer to feel, and they feel the best solution is always to become part of the problem!

Leftopaths are hidebound extortionistic ideologues - there can be no negotiating with such habitually criminal people (and I use the term "people" VERY loosely)!

Democrats never agree on facts, not even that "facts" can exist!

They pretend that "Life is too complex for anyone to ever really be able to understand cause-and-effect" (thus proudly claiming to be non-compus-mentis) "so, since all 'facts' are really only opinions anyway, my entirely fact-free, subjective opinion (i.e: that your stuff is really my stuff) is the diversely opposite equal to your silly objective "facts!" Whee!" That's always the backwards 'justification' for their perpetual extortion attempts (aka: slavery).

Leftopathy is a self-inflicted habit. They don't want to be cured, because extortion (accusing others) is easier than working!

Trump has an absolute majority, and since the leftist press will excoriate and attack him no matter what he does, he should damn "appearances" and simply ram through the legislation the people hired ('elected') him to anyway!


SJWs and HRCs

SJWs (Social Justice Warriors) & HRCs (Human Rights Commissions; not Hillary Rodham Clintons)

"Social" justice really only ever means group or gang rights trumping all real live citizen individuals' equal human rights.

It's also known as group-might-makes-right gangster "extortion," "communism" and, ultimately, "slavery."

Fitting perfectly in with their "SINCE you could discriminate, SO you WILL discriminate, so WE HAVE TO discriminate against YOU, first!" "pre-emptively defensively," slanderously paranoid attitudes, SJW criminals pretend to justify always attacking first. Perpetual victimhood implies a permanent oppressor, against whom ends always justify means!

They pretend to prevent racial and emotional stereotyping by writing bills which emotionally and racially stereotype.

They go for the largest local group class(ifications) aka "privileged white males," whose only real natural privilege is being inherently smarter than others - a condition no legislation can alter, except by forcing them through guilt to breed down to the lower common denominators, which, ironically, are already on exact par (blacks) or in the absolute majority (Dravidians, Asians) worldwide. So they are, in fact, working on behalf of the global majorities to suppress and oppress a global minority, all in the name of preventing oppressive discrimination by promoting racial minorities.

And when called out on their claims' lack of logic and factual evidence, they pretend that "Life is too complex for anyone to ever really be able to understand cause-and-effect," (thus also implicitly proudly claiming to be non-compus-mentis) "so, since all 'facts' are really only opinions anyway, my entirely fact-free, subjective opinion (i.e: that your stuff is really my stuff) is the diversely opposite equal to your silly objective "facts!" Whee!"

That's always the backwards, slanderously victim-blaming 'justification' their for perpetual extortion attempts (aka: slavery) - "Since you were going to enslave me first, I had to try to enslave you! And it's not an evil crime because we (i.e: you) all do it, too!" (Attack first, and, when caught, double-down and attack again, by blaming your victims by slanderously claiming they made you do it! That defines "Sin")!

Leftopathy is a self-inflicted habit. They don't want to be cured, because extortion (accusing others) is easier than working!


HRCs are SJW snake-pits - all about dividing us into 'diverse' group-might-made-rights gangs, totally opposed to equal HUMAN rights!

Tuesday, March 21, 2017


Corporations are illegal: irresponsible gang-might-makes-right scams.

The full title is "Legal Fiction of the Corporate Person" - it's idolatry, where they pretend groups of individual persons are single people. In reality, it gives everyone in the "corporate" person a shield of fraud (obviously, a "legal fiction" is still really only an illegal LIE, no matter what they say it is) to hide behind; it basically only embodies the notion that:

"I didn't do it - ONLY The GROUP did it! Whee!"

It "legalizes" the false notion that people can have rights without responsibilities, just  like all criminals want - the right to your stuff, without the responsibility for having to pay for or otherwise earn it. It legalizes theft through fraud. Lying is the most basic form of theft: it's the (at least, attempted) theft of the Truth. Since all crimes are forms of theft (non or pre-consensual transfer of property; aka attacking first) lying ("fraud") is a crime.

That's also why so many corporations have 'LLC' after their names - it stands for "Limited Liability Corporation" (aka limited responsibility)! It means the might-makes-right force of the false "law" enables them to have the right to injure people without being held "legally" responsible for it.

Do you want proof?

The only reason you can't - yet - get away with murder on your private property, is that you probably still define your self as a real, live, individual human person, and not as the other kind of "person" (aka as the "Legal Fiction of the Corporate Person") which, by choosing to put on the magical tautological and legalistic Ring of Power (by simply declaring yourself to be a "Corporation") you will gain the legally magical ability to become invisible to all real human laws, and so to discorporate your self from common sense and all real human culpability, see?

(This article is from 2007, the crimes occurred in 2001, and the families LOST the lawsuit, when the courts declared the corp. was legally allowed to "dilute" the culpability of the murderers by the number of their murdered victims;) - in other words, "Each employee was only responsible for less than a whole murder, so no crimes occurred at all! Whee!"

Besides, you can't jail a "corporation."


In fact, ALL corporations start as pre-meditated conspiracies in this way:

Imagine if you or I went before a judge, and asked him:

"Your honor, I want the right to take risks with other people's lives and other properties, for gains which will only accrue to my self!"

He'd probably tell us to get lost (at minimum) and maybe even charge us with conspiring in advance to commit fraud and other crimes, like blatant extortion.

But the second we join together into a group or GANG, and say "Your honor, WE want to do this!" he automatically rubber stamps our criminally negligent conspiracy, as a  "corporate, legal" fiction!



And, (even worse!):

Greedy corporations bribed legislators to make "corporate law" for them selves which forces them to think shallowly and ironically denies them the right to make sacrifices now to plan for the future! They MUST buy lowest (from their 3rd world slave-pens) and sell highest; so they can't invest in local industries with higher labor costs by making sacrifices now, even if they wanted to!

Their own foolish laws would put them in jail for using common sense to plan ahead!

Tuesday, March 14, 2017

The Return of SLAVERY

(Actually, it never really left)!


Socialism is slavery.
Fascism is slavery.
Islam is slavery.

Hypocrisy - the double-standards of do as I say, not as I do - is what all criminals, whether libertine "liberal" ones, or holy-mobster "muslims" are all about!

All criminals want to "progress" to having ever-more rights, and ever-less responsibilities all the time. They want a right to your stuff, without any responsibility to have to earn or otherwise pay for it.

And the best way for criminals to disarm their victims is to convince them that there are no real crimes nor criminals, but only helpless victims all the time.

Thus the only crime, they pretend, would be to accuse "another" helpless victim of being a "criminal," simply because they tried to commit a "crime" against you!

Perpetual victimology is perpetual slander, because it implies a permanent oppressor.

That way they can cast them selves as victims, and their victims as criminals.

Victimology is thus no more or less than perpetual extortion, aka SLAVERY.

By forcing their victims to produce without remuneration, criminals are slavers.

All criminals at least temporarily enslave their victims. Robbery forces others to work for crooks for free.

Delinquent criminally negligent libertine "liberal" criminals are takers who enslave makers by not working.

Slavery is simply permanent extortion. Banks enslave debtors with the idea that they are owed labor for loans.

Like all criminals, leftists are defeatist masochists at heart, having no faith in being able to trust even them selves, and so in stead choosing to slander everyone else as being equally untrustworthy.

Like Muhammad, their defeatism leads to self-fulfilling prophecies, where they attack everyone else, first, then blame their victims for having "made" them attack. Their alibis to excuse their criminal choices are that there is no free will and there were no choices to be made; they pretend to be victims at the mercy of inevitable, "predetermined/predestined" force: victims of society/mere products of their environments, and of course proud slaves of "allah."

(n.) the impossibility of comprehending the universe; the belief that human knowledge can never have true certainty.
... aka: The criminal's favorite alibi: "Life is too complex so my opinion that your stuff is really mine, is a FACT!"

Masochists pretend to “control” their fears (in stead of trying to learn to recognize and fix mistakes and solve problems by paying attention to their fears) BY causing the same, worst-case scenario, pain-causing problems they fear the most.

When perceiving a threat, delinquent libertine criminals feel the best solution is to become part of the problem!

(Hence libertine "liberalism," where they pretend that it’s noble to pretend that fear doesn’t exist, and so always want to “progress” to “freedom” from the fearful pain of self-restraint).

In this way, they hope to avoid the fear of pain, by pre-emptively inflicting that pain on themselves (thus cancelling the auxiliary pain caused by the fear)! See?

But while not ALL criminal negligence is masochism, all masochism IS criminal negligence.

And of course, such criminals are also always all about the subjective double-standards:

What they advocate for in public may be only an attempt to sway everyone ELSE to SUBMIT!

Meanwhile, they think to them selves: "You're all fools, and I'm better than you!" Hypocrisy is the hallmark of ALL criminals and also accounts for 100% of "mental illnesses!" Paranoia IS slander:

'LIBERAL' MOTIVATION: "You're all out to get me so I'm gonna 'have to' get you first!"

Being selfish, they embrace hypocritical double standards, wanting rights without responsibilities, to never be offended by having their feelings hurt by the painful truth of being accused of their crimes.

Why do criminal gangsters from one gang always defend the criminal "rights" (to remain irresponsibly wrong) of any other, much less all other, criminal gang enterprises, too?

Why do they accept other criminals 'right' to attack them, first, when they are otherwise hypocrites, all about the subjective double-standards where only they have rights, and all others only ever have responsibilities - to them?!

Why to they all "GO ALONG" (with criminal lies) "TO GET ALONG" (with all the other lying criminals)?

Here's both how and why:

It's because their own inherent intrinsic and instinctive primary individual crime-excusing alibi is the slanderous and victim-blaming Argumentum Tu Quoque - that "WE (i.e: you) ALL DO IT, TOO!"

If and when they choose to stand for nothing, (no cause/effect) they choose to fall for anything.

It's why the current, treasonous gangster "socialist" allegedly Christian pope always defends islam.

All criminals ultimately pretend there are no facts (proudly and falsely 'confessing' they are non-compus mentis) and all their 'crimes' are only mistakes, because we're all only helpless victims!

As slavers, they expect others to have only responsibilities to them – to embrace suicidal masochism as their highest virtue, endorsing 'Collectivism' is hypocrisy, extorted by others' might-makes-right gangsterism into the Stockholm Syndrome, where one endorses "GOING ALONG" (with criminal lies) "TO GET ALONG" (with lying criminals).

There is no herd instinct in humans; no groupthink penchant either. In thinking about their futures, all rational individuals make individual judgments. If and when joining a group or gang of other individuals is seen to be more beneficial at a certain given time than another, people will chose it.

People really only permanently join ever-larger gangs to increase their 'rightful' ability to use force to extort other people, and to dilute their personal responsibility.

All criminals want to enslave their victims.

As subjectivists, all about the double-standards, only they are to be allowed to be considered innocent until (NEVER!) proven guilty, while everyone else is to be considered guilty until (NEVER!) proven innocent. As such, others have to prove the criminally negligent hypocrite is guilty, while also having to prove a negative; i.e:

"Prove you DIDN'T hurt my (wholly subjective, unprovable, opinionated) feelings, you hateful racist bigots!"

Then they try to get this enshrined into "laws" where only the criminals have rights, while only all the innocent law-abiding civilized victims have responsibilities - to obey the criminals!

(And it seems to be working - as we see here).

Group (gangster) rights give individuals extra rights to extort others and to dilute responsibility.

Corporations do this, with their "buy low/sell high" bulk-buying economies-of-scale imperatives.

Political parties do this, despite the fact it's illegal to conspire to influence legislators' votes.
(There is a right to free association, but it ends at the office where one is paid to do a job).

Street thugs and every kind of organized criminals do this - and even the unorganized ones claim membership in some sort of pre-existing "minority" victimhood groups.

Excuses aren't reasons:they're LIES, and lies (attempted theft of the truth, i.e: "fraud") are crimes.

"Slavery is good (for you, not me)! Just Submit and get it over with, like everyone else, and you can join (and then help merge) the right gangs, meet all the right people, and work your way up from the inside to being chief slaver!"

When caught at their "Enslave Or Be Enslaved" plots, it's: "Be a sport! Gimme a pass! We're all only victims, right?"

In that way alone, (by posing as a "victim") the Devil pretends he doesn't exist.

Any questions?


Bottom line: there is an easy solution to this, a way to cure leftopathic libtardation, but it might involve a cult-deprogramming session to get them to choose hope over fear. See, what they really fear, is being 'enslaved' to and by responsibility, and so they in stead enslave them selves to avoiding it - to habitual irresponsibility, to the false right to remain irresponsibly wrong. And this is because they haven't thought through, or been taught, the basic Golden Rule of Law which most simply defines morality as "Do Not Attack First" - where our only real right is to not be attacked first by others, and our only real responsibility is to not attack (thereby innocent) others, first. How easy to understand, remember and endorse is that? As opposed to their constant convoluted agitations to avoid what they perceive to be an enslaving altruistic obligation to help other victims all the time!