Friday, October 13, 2017

MultiCulturalism, Hate-Crimes, Diversity and Religions101

For multiculturalism to work, the hosts must abandon their own culture – thus negating the “multiculturalism!”
The leftopaths’ ideals of “Diversity” really only mean “divide and conquer:” Hey your already fully functional, cohesive, and integrated society needs to be “fixed” by making it LESS integrated! Their motto seems to be: “There’s No Money In Solutions! Whee!”
What is this constant “multiculturalism!” scam (and the implicit “you’re all racists!” slander) all about?
Who cares what spicy, exotic foods one eats, or what weird sartorial clothing choices one makes?!
There’s only two ‘cultures’ in nature, that of the law-abiding, civilized people who symbiotically band together and collaborate to solve mutual problems, and that of the criminal savages who always attack first by slanderously blaming their victims, in order to keep others on the defensive.
And crime is more of an anti-social anti-culture than “another” culture, even if only of a hypothetically “diversely opposite equal” variety.
And similarly, as for these delinquent libertine “liberal” criminals’ divine mantra of “DIVERSITY!” well:
Diversity =/= equality – in fact, quite the opposite!

“HATE” isn’t the problem, it’s a symptom they have to address to distract us from what they’re really trying to ban.
Since rational people get angry with criminals for their predatory choices, and criminals insist they have no choices because we’re all equally victims who should therefore tolerate the diverse differences between the kind of victim who attacks innocent others first, and those who don’t, they insist pity is always good and anger is always bad.
Since criminals expect that all is generally allowed unless and until it is very specifically disallowed in advance, the only real crime is trying to prevent them from doing whatever they want to do, to whomever they want to do it to, and whenever they want to do it. Such attempts are always seen by them as “mean!” or more recently, “HATEFUL!”
But as Robert Spencer noted:
Incitement to violence is easy to spot – but incitement to “hostility” is in the eye of the beholder; so all anti-free-speech initiatives conflate (anti-crime) free speech and even (what they call “hateful”) feelings with actual violent crimes; for instance trying to criminalize speech against a religion or race (say, against someone for their simply noticing that islam isn’t really a race or a religion, but is only a global crime-gang).
The whole notion of “hate-speech” and “hate-crimes” IS a crime! Having “hate” isn’t a criminal act, it’s EITHER the perfectly natural and neutral human response of perpetual anger towards ongoing injustices (like islam), OR it’s a victim-blaming slanderous HABIT; but either way, it’s only an effect, and not a cause of anything. I hate crimes & the criminals who commit them; so what?
“Hate crimes” are really only *thought*-crimes, which is a victim-blaming slanderous assertion made by criminals to deflect everyone’s attention away from their own crimes (since criminals are psycho-paths who hate thinking, of course to them nobody else should ever be allowed to indulge in potentially “dangerous” thinking, either) by asserting that anyone merely considering or feeling that one should dislike something bad – ANYTHING bad, aka crime and criminals – should be accused of committing the only “illegal crime” in itself: “Hate!”
“DIVERSITY” is where one has given up on using one’s angry energy to unite people, to stop them from being criminals, and so one decides in stead to pretend to PITY every one and every thing equally … in stead of caring enough to risk being angry.
so one then pretends to PITY them by using various less offensive and obvious synonyms for pity, such as “tolerance ,” “compassion,” and slanderous “inclusiveness” – as if some people had already been “excluded” just for being “different,” and are therefore victims – as opposed to having excluded them selves by choosing to be criminals.
So “diversity!” means a demand to embrace (pity; tolerate) the difference between self-determined criminals and their innocent victims, rather than get angry with and try to change them.
The real emphasis, in “Diversity!” is on “Tolerating” it – because why would anyone have to be told or ordered to tolerate that which was NOT dangerous to them (i.e: crime and criminals!)?!?
Claiming “Diversity is always Good!” is idolatry, because in reality, in some situations and circumstances, it’s good, and in some it’s bad – but it’s NOT always good! As with all idolatry, the dynamics have been extracted or “abstracted” – the diversity FROM what, and TO what, have been removed from our ability to think about them, by the criminals’ choice of focus words.
The purpose of idolatry is to hide and distract us from being able to see the implications of each statement: that rights only come with responsibilities, responsibilities with rights, causes with effects and effects with causes.
People who haven’t taken the time to thoroughly define their terms of reference can only fall back on unreliable vague and generalized feelings – which most often result in a contrarian and adversarial “Me Good, You Bad!” subjectively hypocritical stance of paranoid masochism.
Further, in regards to “DIVSERSITY:”
The leftopaths went from tolerating it, to celebrating it, and now to enforcing it on others.
Forcing others to accept one’s “difference” only confesses to one’s unique status as an extortive slaver – revealing, in one’s “diversity,” that the only real difference is a criminal one!
So, people who choose to celebrate the idol of “Diversity!” are all criminals! Because, while they say they really only want to be left alone (thus obeying the Golden Rule of Law) they are also determined to use pre-emptive violence to force others to do so – which decision, as it breaks that very same Golden Rule, reveals their criminal hypocrisy.
Endorsing Diversity means extorting tolerance for criminals because the cowards advocating for it don’t want to risk dealing with them. It’s the Stockholm Syndrome Christian version of islam!

Christians PITY victims, and criminals AS fellow victims! Muslims blame their victims for making them ANGRY, but neither approach solves the problem of crime.
So in this way, Muhammad was right in saying the Christians are closest to the muslims – the carrot to their stick. But in endorsing the god-idol, neither really believes in our free-will; ALL religion is slavery!
The Christian God is pitifully weak, in only pitying us but never correcting evil or solving our problems.
The Muslim God is pointlessly angry at the results of its own chosen actions (having deliberately created infidels for us to attack in order to prove our selves to it).
Both gods are personally impotent yet demand we do nothing to solve any problems – the Christian one endorses no attacks ever (not even in just and moral counter-attacks in defense or either one’s self and/or of innocent others) with its “Vengeance is the Lord’s ALONE!” and “Always Turn the Other Cheek!” and “Resist ye Not Evil Men!” commands, while islam’s always demands we attack everyone all the time, randomly, just as it seems to do.
Both approaches are literally and proudly illogical, irrational, senseless and idolatrous in that they demand the same mindless ritual approach to everything; both ignore the one or the other approaches – attacks and defenses – should be used, but only in response to different situational circumstances, not pre-emptively as attempts to PREVENT crimes.
Crime is defined as attacking thereby innocent others first.
Crime “prevention” is attacking thereby innocent others first.
Both creeds love emotions and hate thought.
In nature, animals’ emotions are their thoughts, and vice-versa – but unlike us, they can not usually divorce or “abstract” them from the dynamics of life; they don’t go from perception to conception and back again in as much detail nor for as extended periods of time as we do – their emotive thoughts are all based on external causes, not removed from them. When animals are hungry or otherwise in pain, their programmed instincts get them angry at the most likely causes of the pains, not at the pains themselves, nor at the fearful memories of past pains.
All religion is idolatry, and all god-idols are excuses for irresponsibility.
Even islam’s “allah” as the supposed all-powerful slaver, simply gets to negate our free-will choices and thus also guilt – it’s nothing more or less than an alibi created to excuse the muslims’ own criminal desires and actions – “I didn’t do it! The Allah Made Me Do It!”
Ditto for Jesus:
“All I have to do is say “Jesus is God!” and it negates all my bad and predatory criminal choices – because then he takes the blame, in more or less becoming the exact same slaver-God that “allah” was, the only difference being that I have to ask him to do so. Oh, wait – even allah demands the testimony (shahada) statement before he will admit to being my Master enslaver – which turns me from being a criminal into a victim.
The existence of ANY “god” is an implicit threat – implying that one not only *shouldn’t* act on one’s own, free-will choices, but also that, ultimately, one CAN’T.
They all remove responsibility and guilt. So they all also really only encourage excuse-making lies and irresponsibility.
To embrace any and all “God” idols is but a free will negating pretense.

FASCBOOK Pays Muslims to Enforce SHARIA On Us!

From here:

WONDER HOW SO MANY MUSLIMS EVEN NOTICED TO DELETE YOUR FB GROUPS?!

France: Facebook Islamists Hunt in Packs

Thursday, October 12, 2017

Berkeley TREASON!

Hello, Mexican Kamerades! Rest assured, we are and shall remain a part of Mexico, now!

;-)

From here:

U.S. Mayor Assures Mexican Consul His "Sanctuary City" Will Provide Safe Spaces for Illegal Aliens

Shortly after Donald Trump got elected president, a California mayor arranged a meeting with the Consul General of Mexico to assure the diplomat that his “sanctuary city” will continue providing safe spaces for illegal immigrants, according to records obtained by Judicial Watch. The documents show that Berkeley Mayor Jesse Arreguin’s top aide, Stefan Elgstrand, sent an electronic mail to the Mexican Consul General in San Francisco, Gemi Jose Gonzalez Lopez, stating the following: “The recent events around Trump’s executive order reminded me to reach out to you. We are a sanctuary city and will continue to be. I imagine you are very busy dealing with the concerns and fears of many residents in the Bay Area, and we want to assist in providing safe spaces for them.”

Judicial Watch obtained the files as part of a California Public Records Act request for information surrounding riots by the radical leftist Antifa movement against President Trump and conservative personalities scheduled to speak at the University of California Berkeley. Media reported that fires were set, fences and windows broken, firebombs launched and commercial-grade fireworks thrown at police. A renowned, San Francisco-based pop culture magazine wrote that the uprising raised some big questions about the future of the free speech movement. Judicial Watch requested the files to shed light into how city, police and university officials handled the lawlessness, which received global news coverage. The request asked for records of communications between officials in the Berkeley mayor’s office and the Berkeley Police Department as well as records of communications between the mayor’s office and officials at UC Berkeley, one of the nation’s top public research universities.

The documents show a coordinated effort between Democratic city officials nationwide to “build the movement to resist Trump.” The operation is being financed by leftwing billionaire philanthropist George Soros through one of his groups called Center of Popular Democracy. Earlier this year Judicial Watch uncovered a scandal in which the U.S. government quietly gave millions of taxpayer dollars to destabilize the democratically elected, center-right government in Macedonia by colluding with Soros’ Open Society Foundation. The U.S. Ambassador to Macedonia, Jess L. Baily, worked behind the scenes with Open Society Foundation to funnel large sums of American dollars for the cause, constituting an interference of the U.S. Ambassador in domestic political affairs in violation of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. The cash flowed through the State Department and the famously corrupt U.S. Agency of International Development (USAID) and Judicial Watch sued both agencies for records related to funding and political activities of the Open Society Foundation in Macedonia.

The Soros-backed, northern California movement includes a taxpayer-salaried physics professor at UC Berkeley who advises Mayor Arreguin on how to handle conservative protestors at a spring rally. The professor, James McFadden, tells the mayor in an electronic mail obtained by Judicial Watch to “create a corral” and ask the Trump supporters to “get in the corral.” He describes Trump supporters as “delusional and paranoid about the world around them” and says they’re “willing to use violence to impose that order on us, especially when they have the blessing of a narcissistic authoritarian president.” A professor at another California public university tells the Berkeley mayor that the arrest of Antifa leader/middle school teacher Yvette Felarca for assaulting a political opponent (captured on video) at a Sacramento rally, in which seven people were stabbed, was a “McCarthyist political persecution” and he condemned Felarca’s arrest and teaching suspension “in the strongest possible terms.”

Ironically, Berkeley’s official government website brags about being a bastion of the free speech movement. “In Alameda County alone, Berkeley is ranked fourth in population behind Oakland, Fremont, and Hayward,” the website states. “And yet, we are famous around the globe as a center for academic achievement, scientific exploration, free speech and the arts.” Indeed, Berkeley is renowned as the birthplace of the free speech movement in in the 1960s. An opinion piece in a California newspaper points out that the city’s free speech movement has gone full circle, however. “Nowadays, Berkeley is rapidly becoming famed as one of the least tolerant cities in the country — where any challenge to left-wing orthodoxy is met with terrorist threats and mob violence.”

Monday, September 25, 2017

New Liberal Victim Category: "People Of Crime!"

From The Ottawa Citizen, Monday, September 25, 2017, P.#A9, and here:

As the House of Commons Standing Committee on Health discussed the Cannabis Act last week, there has been a lot of chatter about providing expedited – if not free and automatic – pardons to people with simple possession convictions.

This is a step in the right direction, but there are thousands of other people with different kinds of criminal records who are now law-abiding, yet face discrimination as it relates to employment and access to other basic necessities who need similar consideration to become fully contributing members of Canadian society.

SO WHAT?! ALL CRIMES ARE PROSECUTED OFTEN LONG AFTER THE FACT OF THEIR COMMISSION, WHEN THE GUILTY PARTIES ARE NO LONGER CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGERS! THE MERE PASSAGE OF TIME DOESN'T VOID ONE'S GUILT NOT EXEMPT ONE FROM PAYING FOR WHAT ONE HAS TAKEN FROM OTHERS! YOU ARE ONLY TRYING TO DEPRIVE INNOCENT PEOPLE OF THEIR OWN RIGHT TO DISCRIMINATE BETWEEN THOSE WHO HAVE CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED PREDATORY INTENT AND ACTIONS FROM THOSE WHO HAVEN'T SHOWN A PROPENSITY TO DO SO!

Thanks to the previous federal government, we have a two-tiered system in place for people who want (and need) their criminal record sealed. Apart from the lengthy wait-times and strict eligibility criteria introduced under the Safe Streets and Communities Act in 2012, the $631 application fee is enough to deter many from applying for a record suspension (formerly known as a pardon).

There are often other costs associated with the application process that can increase the price to around $1,000 – making it an impossible cost for those living in poverty.

For the most part, people want to apply for a record suspension so that they can find employment. Without a record suspension, employers can access all conviction information which limits access to higher paid and permanent jobs. The reality is that without a job, people cannot save the money required to have their record sealed.

This leaves many individuals stuck in a cycle of unemployment and poverty, and often means they rely on social assistance or break the law to meet their basic needs.

NO, POVERTY DOES NOT CAUSE CRIME; ONE'S CRIMINAL CHOICES CAUSE POVERTY!

To date, there have been successful legal challenges in Ontario and British Columbia with respect to the changes made to the Criminal Records Act by asserting that they infringe upon the charter rights of individuals with criminal records.

WAIT - WHAT?! CRIMINALS HAVE A "CHARTER RIGHT" TO NOT BE IDENTIFIED AS OR CALLED "CRIMINALS," BASED ON THEIR OWN INTENTIONALLY CHOSEN ACTIONS?!

B.C. Supreme Court Justice Heather MacNaughton wrote in her decision that “a criminal record is punishment” and that the changes made by the previous federal government act in opposition to principles of rehabilitation and public safety.

WELL,  NO DUH! OF COURSE A CRIMINAL RECORD IS PUNISHMENT, BUT IT'S A WELL KNOWN AND PREDICTABLE CONSEQUENCE OF ONE'S OWN PREDATORY CHOICES!

While these decisions mean that people in Ontario and B.C. can apply for pardons under the pre-2012 system, they are still required to pay the $631 user fee to access protections guaranteed under the Canadian Human Rights Act.

In January 2016, Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale announced that reforming the Criminal Records Act was a priority for the Liberal government. He acknowledged that the changes made under the previous government were unnecessarily punitive and that the $631 application fee was far too high. In December 2016, Public Safety Canada conducted a public consultation, but the results of that survey have yet to be released.

While many criminalized people wait for action, many individuals and organizations who work with them support a free and automatic pardon process as is the practice in jurisdictions like the United Kingdom and in our own youth justice system. A more streamlined record management process would allow people with criminal records to access various social domains such as employment, education, travel, safe housing and volunteer opportunities, and would better support meaningful integration into the community.

YOU MUST MEAN "SELF-CRIMINALIZED PEOPLE." BECAUSE BY DEFINITION CRIME REQUIRES A PREDATORY INTENT AND CHOICE TO ACT ON IT WHEREBY THE PERSON THEREBY CHOOSES TO BECOME A "CRIMINAL" - IT'S NOT A FORM OF INEXPLICABLE ACCIDENT OR MYSTERIOUS TRAGEDY WHICH SOMEHOW JUST HAPPENS TO THEM!

People should not have to pay for human rights protections and continue to be punished well after they have served their debt to society. To continue with the status quo as it relates to pardons in Canada is not only harmful to the criminalized, but to us all.

WRONG! YOUR PLAN WOULD DEPRIVE THE INNOCENT CITIZENS - PEOPLE WHO HAVE NOT COMMITTED ANY CRIMES - OF THEIR RIGHT TO KNOW OF AND ASSESS THE INHERENT DANGERS PRESENTED BY THOSE WHO HAVE CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED - AS IN "WERE VETTED BY THE LEGAL PROCESS" - THEIR OWN CRIMINAL PROPENSITY.

Fundamental reforms to the Criminal Records Act were needed yesterday and the federal government needs to act now.

Samantha McAleese is a PhD candidate in sociology at Carleton University and a member of the Criminalization and Punishment Education Project.

WELL, THAT EXPLAINS IT, THEN! CARLETON UNIVERSITY LOL! THE MOST LEFTOPATHIC OF ALL OF CANADA'S HIGHER-LEARNING MENTAL INSTITUTIONS!

"BUT WHAT UNDERLIES THIS LOCK-STEP AVOIDANCE OF RATIONALITY AND COMMON-SENSE FACTS IN SUCH PLACES, VLAD?" ONE MIGHT WELL ASK ME.

WELL ... It's because all the "soft science" humanities ask Why, not How, we do things. Asking Why posits no free-will conscious choice exists, because we are all merely victims at the mercy of mysterious, unknown and unknowable yet somehow also "inevitable" forces beyond our control. Like this:

Law-abiding Conservatives: "Criminal behavior is an effect of free-will choice!"
Criminal libertines: "But what CAUSED that choice? There's always a cause!"

Their implication is that there are no crimes nor criminals because we're all "victims."

But since rational people get angry with criminals for their predatory choices, and criminals insist they have no choices because we're all equally victims who should therefore tolerate the diverse differences between the kind of "victim" who attacks innocent others first, and those who don't, they must insist pity is always good and anger is always bad. Besides, virtue-signalling one's pity, ("compassion") in stead of showing one's anger, ("hate!") no matter how righteous or justified, is a lot less risky than accusing potentially violent and personally dangerous criminals of their crimes.

So these days, pitying the victims (and the criminals AS victims,) is held up by the cliques of cowards in government, media and education as the highest moral virtue, while being angry or "hateful" towards criminals and crime is held the most vile sin.

But what is really more useful in remedying crime: being angry at criminals for their predatory choices, or encouraging them to commit more crimes by pitying them as helpless victims too? Dynamic, hopeful anger - or static, useless and fearful pity?

The answer is obvious ... but not to any of these mavens of "Higher Education."

CAPISCE?

;-)

Wednesday, September 13, 2017

MI6 killed Princess Diana!

From here:

Former MI6 member Richard Tomlinson claims that Slobodan Milosevic was the target of the British intelligence, which developed a special plan for the purpose.
According to Vecernje Novosti, this plan was later applied to remove British Princess Diana.
The newspaper writes that Tomlinson presented his findings ten years ago before the High Court of Justice in London – but that his claims have again become topical after the recent statements made by retired intelligence officer John Hopkins (80), who claims that he personally participated in “removing” the princess of Wales.
According to Tomlinson’s claims – that also made it to the documentary “Playing Dirty”, dedicated to the dark activities of the British intelligence service MI6 – the former Yugoslav and Serbia president was to be killed in 1993 in a way that was to look like a traffic accident. A tunnel in Switzerland, near Geneva, where Milosevic was supposed to take part in an international conference about the former Yugoslavia, was chosen as the site.
The plan was to cause the accident as Milosevic’s limousine was traveling over the mountain, by turning on strong lights or lasers that would have blinded the driver. It was allegedly estimated that such a scenario would have had the greatest chance of resulting in death.
Eyewitnesses to the tunnel accident that killed Diana, claim to have seen blinding lights before it happened. It’s just one in a series of dreadful coincidences between the Milosevic assassination plan and Diana’s death, Tomlinson is quoted as saying.
He further claims that Milosevic’s liquidation plan had been dropped, but that the scenario was later applied to Princess Diana.

Saturday, September 9, 2017

Germany funds Pali terrorists, lets them run in German elections

From here:


  • Even as Germany is increasingly cracking down on criticism of Islam, it appears prepared to give a genuine Islamic terrorist group the opportunity to win seats in its parliament.
In a remarkable decision taken at the end of August, Germany's Interior Ministry declined to bar the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) -- listed as a terrorist organization by the US, Canada, the European Union, and Australia -- "from campaigning as a political party in the September general election to the Bundestag."

Yes, the PFLP -- on a joint list with the Marxist-Leninist Party -- plans to field candidates in this month's elections in Germany and run for Parliament.

What is the PFLP? Formed shortly after Israel's Six-Day War through the merger of three militant groups -- The Young Avengers (Palestinian nationalists), The Heroes of the Return (based in Lebanon), and the Palestinian Liberation Front (which operated largely out of Syria and the West Bank) -- it is today, after Fatah, the second largest faction in the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). Described variously as a blend of "Palestinian nationalism with Marxist ideology" and as "a Palestinian nationalist organization with different ideological outlooks at different times (from Arab nationalist, to Maoist, to Leninist)," it has called for Israel's destruction and international communist revolution.

Considered more radical than Fatah, it has, ever since its founding, routinely targeted civilians without remorse. During its early days, it was on friendly terms with Germany's Red Army Faction (the Baader-Meinhof Gang) and received funding from the USSR and China. In recent years the PFLP has been chummy with Iran.

Coming soon to Germany's Parliament?
Pictured: Terrorists of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) in Jordan, in 1969. (Image source: Library of Congress/Thomas R. Koeniges/LOOK/Wikimedia Commons)


Half a century ago, the PFLP specialized in hijacking planes -- it was the first Palestinian group to do so, and the first successfully to commandeer an El Al plane. That act, in 1968, is widely considered to mark the beginning of the modern era of international Islamic terrorism. On a single day in September 1970, its members hijacked three passenger flights headed from European airports to New York. In 1972, a PFLP member took part in the Lod Airport Massacre, in which 28 people were murdered at what is now called Ben Gurion International Airport. In October 2001, it assassinated Israeli Tourism Minister Rehavam Ze'evi in retaliation for Israel's killing of its top leader at the time, Abu Ali Mustafa (after whom the group's militant wing is now named).

During the next few years, the PFLP focused on suicide bombings in Israel; more recently, it has kept
busy firing rockets into Israel from the Gaza Strip.

In November 2014, two PFLP associates murdered six people in a synagogue massacre in Jerusalem. On June 16 of this year, it collaborated with Hamas on a fatal attack in East Jerusalem; on July 14, it murdered two Israeli police officers in Jerusalem's Old City and bragged that its "heroic operation" had successfully broken through "the security cordon imposed by the Israeli occupation forces on the city of Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa, breaking the arrogance of the Zionist security which sees in the city and in Al-Aqsa an impenetrable fortress."

Perhaps the PFLP's most famous operative is Carlos the Jackal, the legendary Venezuelan terrorist, currently serving a life sentence in France. Another high-profile member is Leila Khaled, who has been called "the first woman hijacker in history" and who has been allowed in recent years to enter many Western countries, including Germany, Sweden, Austria, and South Africa, to deliver speeches, meet with fellow communists, and confer with supporters of movements that try to destroy Israel economically.

If it seems exceedingly inappropriate for these countries' governments to afford Khaled such treatment, consider that the UN, the EU, and a number of European countries, including Germany, France, Britain, Ireland, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Spain, Sweden, Denmark, and Norway, have funded non-governmental organizations with links to PFLP -- among them Addameer, Al-Haq, the Alternative Information Center, the Health Work Committee, Stop the Wall, the Palestinian Center for Human Rights, and the Union of Agricultural Work Committees. At least one of the groups in question, according to NGO Monitor, was founded and is run by the PFLP; others have convicted terrorists on their payrolls and/or have abetted PFLP and its members in one way or another. There has, however, been remarkably little media attention paid to the fact that at least some of taxpayer money donated by these Western countries has found its way into the PFLP's coffers, and more than $300 million annually to the salaries of terrorists.

But of all the actions taken by Western governments and international organizations that have benefited the PFLP, none has come as close to legitimizing it as Germany's decision to let it field candidates in this month's elections. "For observers of terrorism in Germany," wrote Benjamin Weinthal in the Jerusalem Post, "it is unclear why the ministry is reluctant to outlaw the Palestinian organization." After all, it is not as if the Federal Republic of Germany has no power to ban parties; it outlawed the Volkssozialistische Bewegung Deutschlands/Partei der Arbeit (People's Socialist Movement of Germany) in 1982 and the Freiheitliche Deutsche Arbeiter Partei (Free German Workers Party) in 1995.

Nor are today's German authorities shy about silencing individuals for holding views they consider inappropriate. Gatestone Institute's Soeren Kern noted in 2012 that German authorities were "monitoring... websites that are critical of Muslim immigration" and were prepared to shut them down. In 2014, Bavarian officials sought to gag critics of a new mega-mosque; in January of last year, the Washington Post reportedthat Germany had "reached a deal with Facebook, Google and Twitter to get tougher on offensive [read: anti-Islamic] content." German police even raided the home of a critic of Muslim refugees.

A German court had given five months' probation to a woman for her online comments "about an alleged rape of a German woman by an asylum seeker." In June 2016, German police raided the homes of thirty-six additional people guilty of "hate posting" online; in July, they raided about sixty more homes.

It is hard not to see this as a strange, ironic, and tragic historical moment. In living memory, Germany was transformed from a fearsome totalitarian power, bent on conquest and genocide, into a cornerstone of liberal democracy. Now, even more than many of its similarly misguided European neighbors, it is plainly headed in a direction that should give pause to every lover of Western freedom: even as it is increasingly cracking down on criticism of Islam, it appears prepared to give a genuine Islamic terrorist group the opportunity to win seats in its national legislature.
Bruce Bawer is the author of the new novel The Alhambra (Swamp Fox Editions). His book While Europe Slept (2006) was a New York Times bestseller and National Book Critics Circle Award finalist
.

Wednesday, September 6, 2017

All Religions Are False: Your Gods Do Not Exist!



"THE GODS" are just anthropomorphosized and idolized concepts of "Good" and "Bad;" which are them selves only future-projected, generalized memories of specific damages, pains, fears of those pains, and reliefs from those damages, pains, and fears, respectively.

And the best is the greatest relief, which is Nothingness - God is ALWAYS "Better Than You (and Me, and Us)!" Forever beyond our reach, our rights, and therefore also beyond our responsibility to deal with, to, or for.

The God idol incorporates, incarnates, and embodies the moral high ground - since it alone has all Rights, it alone also bears all responsibility - bearing it as in bearing it for all our sins by bearing all of our pain.

Which is why the Mithrais/Mitra and Jesus images allegedly always have to conveniently die "for us" each time!

That way, they aren't actually around to annoy us, while also putatively simultaneously be working for us, behind the scenes - out of sight and therefore, oh-so-conveniently, forever out of mind, beyond our guilty, weak and fallible responsibility to actively interact with them/it - which would of course be impossible, because in reality either it is behind everything as an all-powerful puppet-master and deceiver or it doesn't exist at all.

It's an excuse for those who don't want to attack first, to not have to do so, ever - to always "Do Nothing!"

i.e: "I know I worship nothing - but it's MY Nothing!"

;-)

The correct God exists by and for not wanting us to do anything - to always Do Nothing, to never attack first.

Any and all other versions - ones which do allegedly impose obligations on us to do things, to DO unto others, are always wrong and evil, enslaving us and worse, as in islam's "allah," forcing us to war against one another.

PAGANISM IS A STRATEGY TO DIVIDE AND CONQUER ENTIRELY HYPOTHETICAL AND FEARSOME RESPONSIBILITIES TO ANY ONE GOD.

The pagan versions all simply anthromorphosize situational circumstances then divide them into "the gods" to rule over static and idealized impossibilities, like "freedom" and "speed" and "strength" and "war" and "peace" which since they are all abstracted (removed) from their dynamic cause-and-effect TO and FROM circumstances, are null, and the only point of doing so is to forever add more distance between them and us as a delaying shield tactic; divide and conquer, to avoid any consequential responsibility to obey any one version of the nonexistent "god/s!"



FALSE ISLAM SUBMITS TO OUR FEARSOME FEARFULNESS AND INSISTS THAT SINCE IT COULD HAPPEN, SO IT WILL ALWAYS HAPPEN.

And they only exist in our imaginations because, after all - everything does seem to be allowed to happen, both the good and the bad, and as such, they must retroactively have been allowed to happen by the God's "authority."

But even the allah ideal or idol crumbles under the weight of being both unknown and unknowable, because when even the ultimate slaver-god and puppet master is generally behind and so embodies "Everything," it is also then specifically only Nothing - and as existentialism is nihilism, it does not exist. We always invent it and apply it in every specific circumstantial situation, to our subjective selves, and so hope remains forever nebulous, despite also always becoming the static past, as time passes us by as we go on in our permanent ignorant bliss.

Clearly, then, the best and most enduring god-image is that of the Buddha, which has ruled or more accurately presided over the most humans for the longest time, in the most peaceful overall circumstances, in Asia and in India. As their savior figure, it saves us from the endless and pointless dharma (pain fear and false hope) of the endless reincarnating cycle of karma, which is of course equally nonexistent, as all past deeds, all goods and bads, endlessly and eternally balance each other out - once again, existentialism is nihilism, not existing.

And that is both how and why the gods are all always both unknown and unknowable - as they do not really exist.

If in the Zoroastrian binary version, one of them (a 'Devil') only exists to make itself "Better Than You!" to us, by making us "Worse Than You!" while the other tends to condone such behaviour by ignoring it in favour of concentrating on always making its self Better Than Us, then the result is the same - it knows it makes us worse than it. Therefore, either it admits to same in the impossibly static Afterlife, as the Judaic version seems to imply it will, while the Christian version torturously re-kills its Devil and its followers over and over forever or the islamic version is correct where god was never so divided into a god and devil, and nothing ever mattered.

RELIGION IS SUPPOSED TO REMOVE OR AT LEAST INHIBIT EMOTIONS OF JEALOUS GREED AND SO LIMIT OUR PREDATORY MISTAKES.

So, whether the objective beyond the subjective selves is always "Better Than You!" in a hypothetically Good way, whereupon we regard it as "God," or in a Bad way - whereupon it's the delinquent D'evil, doesn't matter: because we know what it wants, because it's always projecting the exact same thing: "I'm Better Than You!" Once we simply realize this objective fact and "Submit" to it, (in islamic parlance) then our subjective frailty doesn't matter; the devil-god can demand no more or less from us, EVER. So if we ignore and thereby also reserve all "I'm Better Than You!" statements to other, external influences beyond our subjective selves, forever, then all that's left for us to deal with is the here and now situational circumstances of our lives, mistakes, and problems. And in fact by and in doing so, we thereby also remove the predatory mistakes called crimes from our existences, too.

We reflect the expansive "I'm Better Than You!" greed like Buddhists or Jains, without experiencing the friction.